What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Neutrino
- Electron
- Particle physics
K. B. M. Mahn mostly deals with Neutrino, Neutrino oscillation, Particle physics, Nuclear physics and Neutrino detector.
His work deals with themes such as Energy and Astrophysics, which intersect with Neutrino.
His studies in Neutrino oscillation integrate themes in fields like Particle identification and Cherenkov detector.
K. B. M. Mahn works mostly in the field of Particle physics, limiting it down to concerns involving Lepton and, occasionally, Proton Synchrotron and J-PARC.
He studied Nuclear physics and Oscillation that intersect with Mass hierarchy and Electron.
The concepts of his Neutrino detector study are interwoven with issues in Solar neutrino problem, Detector, Dark matter, Weakly interacting massive particles and Annihilation.
His most cited work include:
- Indication of Electron Neutrino Appearance from an Accelerator-produced Off-axis Muon Neutrino Beam (1090 citations)
- The T2K Experiment (501 citations)
- Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert (440 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Neutrino, Particle physics, Nuclear physics, Astrophysics and Neutrino oscillation.
The various areas that he examines in his Neutrino study include Astronomy and Muon.
The Particle physics study combines topics in areas such as Energy and Lepton.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Detector and Cross section.
In general Astrophysics, his work in Cosmic ray, Sky, Dark matter and Astroparticle physics is often linked to Flux linking many areas of study.
His work on T2K experiment, Electron neutrino and Sterile neutrino as part of general Neutrino oscillation research is frequently linked to Sensitivity, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
He most often published in these fields:
- Neutrino (76.61%)
- Particle physics (38.30%)
- Nuclear physics (36.84%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Neutrino (76.61%)
- Particle physics (38.30%)
- Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (7.31%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Neutrino, Particle physics, Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Detector and IceCube Neutrino Observatory.
K. B. M. Mahn works on Neutrino which deals in particular with Neutrino oscillation.
Particle physics is closely attributed to Lepton in his research.
He has researched Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment in several fields, including Neutrino detector and Time projection chamber.
His research investigates the link between Neutrino detector and topics such as Galaxy that cross with problems in Dark matter.
In his research on the topic of IceCube Neutrino Observatory, High-energy astronomy is strongly related with Neutrino astronomy.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Constraint on the matter–antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscillations (153 citations)
- Time-integrated Neutrino Source Searches with 10 years of IceCube Data (72 citations)
- Volume I. Introduction to DUNE (55 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Electron
- Neutrino
- Astronomy
His primary areas of investigation include Neutrino, Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, Particle physics, Standard Model and Astrophysics.
His research in Neutrino intersects with topics in Detector, Universe, Astronomy, Sky and Muon.
Muon is a subfield of Nuclear physics that he investigates.
His Nuclear physics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Beam and Particle identification.
As part of his studies on Particle physics, K. B. M. Mahn often connects relevant areas like Lepton.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Tau neutrino, Source spectrum and IceCube Neutrino Observatory in addition to Astrophysics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
