World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 44 16776 736 155 7734

Guillaume Chastanet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guillaume Chastanet between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guillaume Chastanet published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2022. 12 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2022. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 50 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
1999 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guillaume Chastanet: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 4
2006 8
2007 2
2008 4
2009 3
2010 2
2011 6
2012 9
2013 10
2014 2
2015 9
2016 13
2017 20
2018 16
2019 9
2020 6
2021 10
2022 50
2023 27
2024 7
2025 5
Total 231
Download as CSV

Guillaume Chastanet publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillaume Chastanet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 155 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 155
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Guillaume Chastanet D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillaume Chastanet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808 44
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Guillaume Chastanet was a researcher affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their work was primarily situated within the field of Materials Science, with a focus that spanned across multiple subfields including Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Biophysics.

The scientist's research topics covered a wide range of subjects relevant to material structure and properties. These included studies on crystallization and solubility, X-ray diffraction in crystallography, magnetism in coordination complexes, lanthanide and transition metal complexes, metal-catalyzed oxygenation mechanisms, electron spin resonance studies, and the magnetic properties of thin films.

Chastanet contributed extensively to the academic literature, with a significant number of publications. Frequent venues for their research included The Cambridge Structural Database, where they had 85 publications, as well as Crystal Growth & Design, Chemistry - A European Journal, Inorganic Chemistry, and Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers.

Among recent papers associated with their work are:

  • OctaDist: a tool for calculating distortion parameters in spin crossover and coordination complexes, 2020, Dalton Transactions
  • Mapping the cooperativity pathways in spin crossover complexes, 2020, Chemical Science
  • Multiscale Approach of Spin Crossover Materials: A Concept Mixing Russian Dolls and Domino Effects, 2020, Chemistry - A European Journal
  • Room temperature optoelectronic devices operating with spin crossover nanoparticles, 2021, Materials Horizons
  • Photo-Thermal Switching of Individual Plasmonically Activated Spin Crossover Nanoparticle Imaged by Ultrafast Transmission Electron Microscopy, 2021, Advanced Materials

In their scientific collaborations, Chastanet frequently coauthored papers with several researchers, notably Philippe Guionneau, Wenbin Guo, Phimphaka Harding, Nathalie Daro, and David J. Harding.

Best Publications

  • Dysprosium triangles showing single-molecule magnet behavior of thermally excited spin states

    Jinkui Tang;Ian Hewitt;N. T. Madhu;Guillaume Chastanet

  • A nonanuclear dysprosium(III)-copper(II) complex exhibiting single-molecule magnet behavior with very slow zero-field relaxation.

    Christophe Aronica;Guillaume Pilet;Guillaume Chastanet;Wolfgang Wernsdorfer

  • Critical temperature of the LIESST effect in iron(II) spin crossover compounds

    Jean-François Létard;Laurence Capes;Laurence Capes;Guillaume Chastanet;Nicolas Moliner

  • A guideline to the design of molecular-based materials with long-lived photomagnetic lifetimes.

    Jean-François Létard;Philippe Guionneau;Olivier Nguyen;José Sánchez Costa

  • Phosphonate Ligands Stabilize Mixed‐Valent {MnIII20−xMnIIx} Clusters with Large Spin and Coercivity

    Shanmugam Maheswaran;Guillaume Chastanet;Simon J. Teat;Talal Mallah

  • OctaDist: a tool for calculating distortion parameters in spin crossover and coordination complexes.

    Rangsiman Ketkaew;Yuthana Tantirungrotechai;Phimphaka Harding;Guillaume Chastanet

  • Tuning anisotropy barriers in a family of tetrairon(III) single-molecule magnets with an S=5 ground state

    Stefania Accorsi;Anne-Laure Barra;Andrea Caneschi;Guillaume Chastanet

  • Reduced graphene oxide decorated with Co3O4 nanoparticles (rGO-Co3O4) nanocomposite: A reusable catalyst for highly efficient reduction of 4-nitrophenol, and Cr(VI) and dye removal from aqueous solutions

    Amer Al Nafiey;Ahmed Addad;Brigitte Sieber;Guillaume Chastanet

  • Structural characterization of a photoinduced molecular switch.

    Mathieu Marchivie;Philippe Guionneau;Judith A. K. Howard;Guillaume Chastanet

  • Hysteretic three-step spin crossover in a thermo- and photochromic 3D pillared Hofmann-type metal-organic framework.

    Natasha F. Sciortino;Katrin R. Scherl-Gruenwald;Guillaume Chastanet;Gregory J. Halder

  • Spin Crossover Properties of the [Fe(PM-BiA)2(NCS)2] Complex — Phases I and II

    Jean-François Létard;Guillaume Chastanet;Olivier Nguyen;Silvia Marcén

  • A mixed-valence polyoxovanadate(III,IV) cluster with a calixarene cap exhibiting ferromagnetic V(III)-V(IV) interactions.

    Christophe Aronica;Guillaume Chastanet;Ekaterina Zueva;Serguei A. Borshch

  • Spin crossover-induced colossal positive and negative thermal expansion in a nanoporous coordination framework material

    Benjamin R. Mullaney;Laurence Goux-Capes;David J. Price;Guillaume Chastanet

  • Elastic Frustration Triggering Photoinduced Hidden Hysteresis and Multistability in a Two-Dimensional Photoswitchable Hofmann-Like Spin-Crossover Metal–Organic Framework

    Eric Milin;Véronique Patinec;Smail Triki;El-Eulmi Bendeif

  • Synthesis and characterization of mixed-valent manganese phosphonate cage complexes.

    Maheswaran Shanmugam;Guillaume Chastanet;Talal Mallah;Roberta Sessoli

  • Cubane Variations: Syntheses, Structures, and Magnetic Property Analyses of Lanthanide(III)−Copper(II) Architectures with Controlled Nuclearities ‖

    Christophe Aronica;Guillaume Chastanet;Guillaume Pilet;Boris Le Guennic

  • Isolated single-molecule magnets on native gold.

    Laura Zobbi;Matteo Mannini;Mirko Pacchioni;Guillaume Chastanet

  • Four-step iron(II) spin state cascade driven by antagonistic solid state interactions

    Natasha F. Sciortino;Katrina A. Zenere;Maggie E. Corrigan;Gregory J. Halder

  • Condensation of a Nickel Tetranuclear Cubane into a Heptanuclear Single-Molecule Magnet

    Sarah Petit;Petr Neugebauer;Guillaume Pilet;Guillaume Chastanet

  • Light-induced spin crossover—Solution and solid-state processes

    Guillaume Chastanet;Guillaume Chastanet;Maciej Lorenc;Roman Bertoni;Cédric Desplanches;Cédric Desplanches

  • Photo-switching spin pairs—synergy between LIESST effect and magnetic interaction in an iron(II) binuclear spin-crossover compound

    Guillaume Chastanet;Ana B. Gaspar;José Antonio Real;Jean-François Létard

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-François Létard
Jean-François Létard Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Philippe Guionneau
Philippe Guionneau Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Eric Collet
Eric Collet University of Rennes
Dominique Luneau
Dominique Luneau Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Boris Le Guennic
Boris Le Guennic University of Rennes
Malcolm A. Halcrow
Malcolm A. Halcrow University of Leeds
Keith S. Murray
Keith S. Murray Monash University
Kamel Boukheddaden
Kamel Boukheddaden University of Paris-Saclay
Roberta Sessoli
Roberta Sessoli University of Florence
Cameron J. Kepert
Cameron J. Kepert University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA can open doors to various interdisciplinary fields, especially those connected to forensic science and criminal justice. For students interested in applying chemical knowledge to legal investigations, a forensic science bachelor degree online offers a flexible pathway to enter this dynamic field. These programs often combine core chemistry principles with specialized forensic techniques.

Graduate students looking to expand their expertise might consider related areas such as forensic psychology. Choosing from reputable forensic psychology graduate programs online enables learners to explore the psychological underpinnings of criminal behavior, complementing their scientific foundation.

When exploring opportunities, understanding the spectrum of careers in forensics is crucial. Roles vary widely, ranging from laboratory analysts to field investigators, each requiring a unique blend of skills cultivated through targeted education pathways.

Investing in education also means considering the financial aspect. Resources detailing how much is criminal justice school can help prospective students budget wisely and find affordable options that do not compromise on quality. Balancing cost, convenience, and curriculum relevance ensures a meaningful academic journey and a strong career start.

Best Scientists Citing Guillaume Chastanet

Recently Published Articles