World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gareth Edwards-Jones

Gareth Edwards-Jones

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
14433
World Ranking
12405
National Ranking
958

Gareth Edwards-Jones publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth Edwards-Jones sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Gareth Edwards-Jones D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth Edwards-Jones sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gareth Edwards-Jones was affiliated with Bangor University in the United Kingdom. Throughout their career, they contributed to academic research within the scope of this institution.

Data regarding Gareth Edwards-Jones's research papers indicates no recorded publications in the recent period available. There is also no recorded information on frequent co-authors or specific publication venues linked to their name.

No specific main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics have been documented for Gareth Edwards-Jones. Similarly, there is no information on book publications associated with them or any awards won during their career.

The absence of detailed publication records and documented collaborations suggests limited bibliometric data accessibility or that their research output is not extensively cataloged within the data sources reviewed.

Gareth Edwards-Jones is deceased. As such, the profile reflects historical data rather than ongoing academic activity.

Best Publications

  • Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial

    D. L. Jones;Johannes Rousk;G. Edwards-Jones;T. H. DeLuca

  • The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture

    Jules N Pretty;William J Sutherland;Jacqueline Ashby;Jill Auburn

  • Short-term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is both biotically and abiotically mediated

    D.L. Jones;Daniel Murphy;M. Khalid;W. Ahmad

  • The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: Business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland

    Joyce Willock;Ian J. Deary;Gareth Edwards-Jones;Gavin J. Gibson

  • Testing the assertion that ‘local food is best’: the challenges of an evidence-based approach

    Gareth Edwards-Jones;Llorenç Milà i Canals;Natalia Hounsome;Monica Truninger

  • The sleeping policeman: understanding issues of enforcement and compliance in conservation

    A. Keane;J. P. G. Jones;G. Edwards-Jones;E. J. Milner-Gulland

  • Plant metabolites and nutritional quality of vegetables.

    N. Hounsome;B. Hounsome;D. Tomos;G. Edwards-Jones

  • Farmers' Attitudes, Objectives, Behaviors, and Personality Traits: The Edinburgh Study of Decision Making on Farms.

    Joyce Willock;Ian J. Deary;Murray M. McGregor;Alister Sutherland

  • Biochar mediated alterations in herbicide breakdown and leaching in soil

    D.L. Jones;G. Edwards-Jones;Daniel Murphy

  • Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology.

    Freya A. V. St John;Gareth Edwards-Jones;Julia P. G. Jones

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment:understanding nature's value to society. Synthesis of key findings

    R. Watson;S. Albon;R. Aspinall;M. Austen

  • Co-management Policy Can Reduce Resilience in Traditionally Managed Marine Ecosystems

    Stefan Gelcich;Stefan Gelcich;Gareth Edwards-Jones;Michel J. Kaiser;Juan C. Castilla

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment:Technical report

    R Watson;S Albon;R Aspinall;M Austen

  • REVIEW: Nutrient stripping: the global disparity between food security and soil nutrient stocks

    Davey L. Jones;Paul Cross;Paul J. A. Withers;Thomas H. DeLuca

  • The environmental and biosecurity characteristics of livestock carcass disposal methods: A review

    Ceri L. Gwyther;A. Prysor Williams;Peter N. Golyshin;Gareth Edwards-Jones

  • Importance of Attitudinal Differences among Artisanal Fishers toward Co‐Management and Conservation of Marine Resources

    Stefan Gelcich;Gareth Edwards-Jones;Michel J. Kaiser

  • Replacing inorganic fertilizer with anaerobic digestate may maintain agricultural productivity at less environmental cost

    John J. Walsh;Davey L. Jones;Gareth Edwards-Jones;A. Prysor Williams

  • Does eating local food reduce the environmental impact of food production and enhance consumer health

    Gareth Edwards-Jones

  • The role of ecolabeling in fisheries management and conservation.

    Michel J. Kaiser;Michel J. Kaiser;Gareth Edwards-Jones

  • Sensitivity of marine-reserve design to the spatial resolution of socioeconomic data.

    Elizabeth A. Richardson;Elizabeth A. Richardson;Michel J. Kaiser;Gareth Edwards-Jones;Hugh P. Possingham

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel J. Kaiser
Michel J. Kaiser Heriot-Watt University
Davey L. Jones
Davey L. Jones Bangor University
Paul C. Cross
Paul C. Cross United States Geological Survey
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards Bangor University
Julia P. G. Jones
Julia P. G. Jones Bangor University
Paul J. B. Hart
Paul J. B. Hart University of Leicester
Peter N. Golyshin
Peter N. Golyshin Bangor University
Richard S. Quilliam
Richard S. Quilliam University of Stirling
Almudena Hospido
Almudena Hospido University of Santiago de Compostela
John R. Healey
John R. Healey Bangor University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gareth Edwards-Jones