World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Erik Schokkaert

Erik Schokkaert

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
40
Citations
6235
World Ranking
2315
National Ranking
26

Erik Schokkaert publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Schokkaert sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 295 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Erik Schokkaert D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Schokkaert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erik Schokkaert is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has contributed extensively to the fields of economics, econometrics, finance, and social sciences, with additional work related to health professions.

Their research covers a range of topics, with a focus on health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life. Other main topics include global health care issues, experimental behavioral economics studies, economic and environmental valuation, healthcare policy and management, financial literacy, pension and retirement analysis, as well as income, poverty, and inequality.

Schokkaert has published in various venues, including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Economics and Philosophy
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Care Research and Review

Among their recent papers are:

  • "To be or not to be: Future lives in economic evaluation" (2021, Health Economics)
  • "Empirical Research on Ethical Preferences: How Popular Is Prioritarianism?" (2021, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • "Scope and Incentives for Risk Selection in Health Insurance Markets With Regulated Competition: A Conceptual Framework and International Comparison" (2024, Medical Care Research and Review)
  • "Fairness Gaps for Earnings Tax Design" (2024, Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics)
  • "Fair Earnings Tax Reforms" (2023, SSRN Electronic Journal)

Co-author networks around Schokkaert include frequent collaboration with:

  • Koen Decancq
  • Bart Capéau
  • François Maniquet
  • Laurens Cherchye
  • André Decoster

In addition to journal articles, Schokkaert has a book publication titled Prioritarianism in Practice (2022) published by Cambridge University Press.

Their subfields of study extend into economics and econometrics, general health professions, accounting, sociology and political science, and safety research, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to economic and health-related questions.

Best Publications

  • Unfair inequalities in health and health care

    Marc Fleurbaey;Erik Schokkaert;Erik Schokkaert

  • Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation

    Paulo A.L.D Nunes;Paulo A.L.D Nunes;Paulo A.L.D Nunes;Erik Schokkaert

  • Sen's Concept of the Living Standard applied to the Belgian Unemployed

    Erik Schokkaert;Luc Van Ootegem

  • Equity in health and health care

    Marc Fleurbaey;Erik Schokkaert

  • Risk adjustment and risk selection on the sickness fund insurance market in five European countries.

    Wynand P.M.M van de Ven;Konstantin Beck;Florian Buchner;Dov Chernichovsky

  • Empirical social choice

    W. Gaertner;Erik Schokkaert

  • Empirical Social Choice: Questionnaire-Experimental Studies on Distributive Justice

    Wulf Gaertner;Erik Schokkaert

  • Three Meanings of Intergenerational Mobility

    Dirk Van De Gaer;Erik Schokkaert;Michel Martinez

  • The Capabilities Approach

    Erik Schokkaert

  • Responsibility-sensitive fair compensation in different cultures

    Erik Schokkaert;Kurt Devooght

  • Capabilities and Satisfaction with Life

    Erik Schokkaert

  • Preconditions for efficiency and affordability in competitive healthcare markets: are they fulfilled in Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland?

    Wynand P.M.M. van de Ven;Konstantin Beck;Florian Buchner;Erik Schokkaert

  • The Evolution of World Inequality in Well-being

    Koen Decancq;André Decoster;Erik Schokkaert;Erik Schokkaert

  • Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justice

    E. Schokkaert;B. Overlaet

  • The empirical analysis of transfer motives

    Erik Schokkaert

  • Happiness, Equivalent Incomes and Respect for Individual Preferences

    Koen Decancq;Marc Fleurbaey;Erik Schokkaert

  • Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Opportunity Sets

    Erwin Ooghe;Erik Schokkaert;Erik Schokkaert;Dirk Van de gaer;Dirk Van de gaer

  • Risk selection and the specification of the conventional risk adjustment formula.

    Erik Schokkaert;Carine Van de Voorde

  • Debate on Social Justice and Pension Reform: Social Justice and the Reform of Europe's Pension Systems

    Erik Schokkaert;Philippe Van Parijs

  • Empirical Social Choice

    Wulf Gaertner;Erik Schokkaert

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Fleurbaey
Marc Fleurbaey Paris School of Economics
Stef Proost
Stef Proost KU Leuven
Pierre Pestieau
Pierre Pestieau University of Liège
Philippe Van Parijs
Philippe Van Parijs Université Catholique de Louvain
Paulo A. L. D. Nunes
Paulo A. L. D. Nunes Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Jacques H. Dreze
Jacques H. Dreze Université Catholique de Louvain
Victor Ginsburgh
Victor Ginsburgh Université Libre de Bruxelles
Paul De Grauwe
Paul De Grauwe London School of Economics and Political Science
Gert Matthijs
Gert Matthijs KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Economics and Finance in the USA opens up a host of flexible online degree options and career directions. For those with entrepreneurial aims, a cheap online MBA entrepreneurship program can provide a cost-effective way to gain business skills and launch new ventures from anywhere.

If you’re drawn to leadership and organization, consider specializing in a project management major. This path prepares you for managerial roles across various industries and teaches you how to deliver successful projects on time and within budget.

For those interested in finance careers, an accelerated bachelor's degree in finance offers a faster route to graduation and can help you enter the job market more quickly. Alternatively, a fastest MBA provides an intensive curriculum for professionals aiming to upskill and advance in their careers in less time.

With many accredited online options, students have the flexibility to tailor their education to fit their career goals and schedules, making your transition into Economics and Finance both strategic and accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Erik Schokkaert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles