World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
81
Citations
20832
World Ranking
3945
National Ranking
293

Chris Hawes publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Hawes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 263 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Chris Hawes D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Hawes sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chris Hawes was a researcher affiliated with Oxford Brookes University in the United Kingdom. Their academic work focused primarily on the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with particular attention to Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Plant Science, Parasitology, and Biotechnology as subfields of study.

Their research covered a variety of topics including:

  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Transgenic Plants and Applications
  • Studies on Chitinases and Chitosanases
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease

Chris Hawes contributed to several scientific publications, with frequent appearances in these venues:

  • Scientific Reports
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
  • Journal of Microscopy
  • Methods in molecular biology

Recent significant papers included:

  • "p24 Family Proteins Are Involved in Transport to the Plasma Membrane of GPI-Anchored Proteins in Plants" (2020) published in PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
  • "Functional characterization of Schistosoma mansoni fucosyltransferases in Nicotiana benthamiana plants" (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Functional organisation of the endomembrane network in the digestive gland of the Venus flytrap: revisiting an old story with a new microscopy toolbox" (2020) published in Journal of Microscopy
  • "Differences in intracellular localisation of ANKH mutants that relate to mechanisms of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease and craniometaphyseal dysplasia" (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Make It Shine: Labelling the ER for Light and Fluorescence Microscopy" (2024) published in Methods in molecular biology

Throughout their career, they collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Verena Kriechbaumer, Kim van Noort, D. Linh Nguyen, Cornelis H. Hokke, and A. Schots. These collaborations reflect a network of scientific inquiry spanning molecular and cellular biology fields.

Best Publications

  • Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants.

    Imogen A Sparkes;John Runions;Anne Kearns;Chris Hawes

  • Stacks on tracks: the plant Golgi apparatus traffics on an actin/ER network†

    Petra Boevink;Karl Oparka;Simon Santa Cruz;Barry Martin

  • A Rab1 GTPase Is Required for Transport between the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Golgi Apparatus and for Normal Golgi Movement in Plants

    Henri Batoko;Huan-Quan Zheng;Chris Hawes;Ian Moore

  • Mapping the Arabidopsis organelle proteome

    Tom P. J. Dunkley;Svenja Hester;Ian P. Shadforth;John Runions

  • Characterisation of programmed cell death during aerenchyma formation induced by ethylene or hypoxia in roots of maize (Zea mays L.)

    Arunika H. L. A. N. Gunawardena;Deborah M. Pearce;Michael B. Jackson;Chris R. Hawes

  • Endoplasmic reticulum export sites and Golgi bodies behave as single mobile secretory units in plant cells.

    Luis L.P. daSilva;Erik L. Snapp;Jürgen Denecke;Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz

  • Membrane Protein Transport between the Endoplasmic Reticulum and the Golgi in Tobacco Leaves Is Energy Dependent but Cytoskeleton Independent: Evidence from Selective Photobleaching

    Federica Brandizzi;Erik L. Snapp;Alison G. Roberts;Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz

  • Electron microscopy of plant cells

    J. L. Hall;C. R. Hawes

  • Redistribution of membrane proteins between the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum in plants is reversible and not dependent on cytoskeletal networks.

    Claude M Saint-Jore;Janet Evins;Henri Batoko;Federica Brandizzi

  • The Destination for Single-Pass Membrane Proteins Is Influenced Markedly by the Length of the Hydrophobic Domain

    Federica Brandizzi;Nathalie Frangne;Sophie Marc-Martin;Chris Hawes

  • Immunological evidence that plants use both HDEL and KDEL for targeting proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum

    R. M. Napier;L. C. Fowke;C. Hawes;M. Lewis

  • Plant neurobiology: no brain, no gain?

    Amedeo Alpi;Nikolaus Amrhein;Adam Bertl;Michael R. Blatt

  • Plant N-Glycan Processing Enzymes Employ Different Targeting Mechanisms for Their Spatial Arrangement along the Secretory Pathway

    Claude Saint-Jore-Dupas;Andreas Nebenführ;Aurélia Boulaflous;Marie-Laure Follet-Gueye

  • Photoactivation of GFP reveals protein dynamics within the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

    John Runions;Thorsten Brach;Sebastian Kühner;Chris Hawes

  • N-glycans harboring the Lewis a epitope are expressed at the surface of plant cells.

    A C Fitchette-Lainé;V Gomord;M Cabanes;J C Michalski

  • The C‐terminal HDEL sequence is sufficient for retention of secretory proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) but promotes vacuolar targeting of proteins that escape the ER

    Veronique Gomord;Lise-Anne Denmat;Anne-Catherine Fitchette-Laine;Beatrice Satiat-Jeunemaitre

  • Movement and Remodeling of the Endoplasmic Reticulum in Nondividing Cells of Tobacco Leaves

    I. Sparkes;J. Runions;C. Hawes;L. Griffing

  • Biosynthesis and Immunolocalization of Lewis a-ContainingN-Glycans in the Plant Cell

    Anne-Catherine Fitchette;Marion Cabanes-Macheteau;Laure Marvin;Barry Martin

  • The plant cytoskeleton, NET3C, and VAP27 mediate the link between the plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum

    Pengwei Wang;Timothy J. Hawkins;Christine Richardson;Ian Cummins

  • Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy

    Chris Hawes

Frequent Co-Authors

Federica Brandizzi
Federica Brandizzi Michigan State University
Lorenzo Frigerio
Lorenzo Frigerio University of Warwick
Petra C. Boevink
Petra C. Boevink James Hutton Institute
Karl J. Oparka
Karl J. Oparka University of Edinburgh
Colin M. Lazarus
Colin M. Lazarus University of Bristol
David G. Robinson
David G. Robinson Heidelberg University
Richard Strasser
Richard Strasser BOKU University
Mark D. Fricker
Mark D. Fricker University of Oxford
David Evans
David Evans University of Bristol
Chris R. M. Grovenor
Chris R. M. Grovenor University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Biology and Biochemistry, various online degrees and healthcare career pathways can broaden your opportunities in the field. Pursuing an online bachelor's degree in biology is a flexible option for students who need to balance studies with work or family commitments. This path equips graduates with foundational knowledge valuable for research, laboratory work, or further studies in medical schools.

If you’re considering a more clinical role, explore medical assistant classes online with financial aid to get started quickly and affordably. For current medical assistants seeking career advancement, enrolling in a cma to lpn bridge program online can help you move into licensed practical nursing with greater responsibilities and earning potential.

Additionally, an online asn program provides a direct route into the nursing profession, combining scientific coursework with practical patient care skills. These pathways allow you to customize your education and set the foundation for various roles within healthcare and research.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Hawes

Recently Published Articles