World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernard F. Hoskins

Bernard F. Hoskins

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
14329
World Ranking
13372
National Ranking
298

Bernard F. Hoskins publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard F. Hoskins sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 240 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Bernard F. Hoskins D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard F. Hoskins sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernard F. Hoskins is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their academic profile focuses on various aspects of scientific research, marked by contributions to the broader academic community through publications and collaborations.

Despite the absence of detailed information on recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues, the association with a major research university indicates engagement in ongoing scholarly activities and contributions to their field.

The scientist's work does not have listed main fields or subfields of study in the available data. This could suggest either a multidisciplinary approach or a focus within a niche area not explicitly cataloged in the data provided.

Similarly, there is no recorded information on specific main topics of work or notable awards, which limits the ability to outline specialized research themes or recognition received throughout the career.

The absence of book publications and a record of cited works may reflect either a focus on journal articles or research outputs not represented in the current dataset.

Given these constraints, Bernard F. Hoskins's profile primarily reflects an academic with an established institutional connection, potentially involved in research activities at the University of Melbourne without publicly indexed metrics or detailed documentation in the provided information.

Best Publications

  • Design and construction of a new class of scaffolding-like materials comprising infinite polymeric frameworks of 3D-linked molecular rods. A reappraisal of the zinc cyanide and cadmium cyanide structures and the synthesis and structure of the diamond-related frameworks [N(CH3)4][CuIZnII(CN)4] and CuI[4,4',4'',4'''-tetracyanotetraphenylmethane]BF4.xC6H5NO2

    B. F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • Infinite polymeric frameworks consisting of three dimensionally linked rod-like segments

    Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • Assembly of porphyrin building blocks into network structures with large channels

    Brendan F. Abrahams;Bernard F. Hoskins;D. M. Michail;Richard Robson

  • An Infinite 2D Polyrotaxane Network in Ag2(bix)3(NO3)2 (bix = 1,4-Bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene)

    Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson;Damian A. Slizys

  • A new type of interpenetration involving enmeshed independent square grid sheets. The structure of diaquabis-(4,4′-bipyridine)zinc hexafluorosilicate

    Robert W. Gable;Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • The Structure of [Zn(bix)2(NO3)2]·4.5 H2O (bix = 1,4‐Bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene): A New Type of Two‐Dimensional Polyrotaxane

    Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson;Damian A. Slizys

  • A new type of infinite 3D polymeric network containing 4-connected, peripherally-linked metalloporphyrin building blocks

    Brendan F. Abrahams;Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • Two Interpenetrating 3D Networks Which Generate Spacious Sealed-Off Compartments Enclosing of the Order of 20 Solvent Molecules in the Structures of Zn(CN)(NO3)(tpt)2/3.cntdot.solv (tpt = 2,4,6-tri(4-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine, solv = .apprx.3/4C2H2Cl4.cntdot.3/4CH3OH or .apprx.3/2CHCl3.cntdot.1/3CH3OH)

    Stuart R. Batten;Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • Ni(tpt)(NO3 )2 -A Three-Dimensional Network with the Exceptional (12,3) Topology: A Self-Entangled Single Net.

    Brendan F. Abrahams;Stuart R. Batten;Martin J. Grannas;Hasan Hamit

  • Interdigitation, Interpenetration and Intercalation in Layered Cuprous Tricyanomethanide Derivatives

    Stuart R. Batten;Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • A Cubic (3,4)-Connected Net with Large Cavities in Solvated [Cu3(tpt)4](ClO4)3 (tpt = 2,4,6-Tri(4-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine)

    Brendan F. Abrahams;Stuart R. Batten;Hasan Hamit;Bernard F. Hoskins

  • Crystal Engineering of Novel Materials Composed of Infinite Two- and Three-Dimensional Frameworks

    Richard Robson;Brendan F. Abrahams;Stuart R. Batten;Robert W. Gable

  • Structures of [Ag(tcm)], [Ag(tcm)(phz)1/2] and [Ag(tcm)(pyz)] (tcm=tricyanomethanide, C(CN)3-, phz=phenazine, pyz=pyrazine)

    Stuart R. Batten;Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • The archetype for a new class of simple extended 3D honeycomb frameworks. The synthesis and x-ray crystal structures of Cd(CN)5/3(OH)1/3.1/3(C6H12N4), Cd(CN)2.1/3(C6H12N4), and Cd(Cn)2.2/3H2O.tBuOH (C6H12N4 = hexamethylenetetramine) revealing two topologically equivalent but geometrically different frameworks

    Brendan F. Abrahams;Bernard F. Hoskins;Jianping Liu;Richard Robson

  • AgC(CN)3-based coordination polymers.

    Brendan F Abrahams;Stuart R Batten;Bernard F Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • 3D Knitting patterns. Two independent, interpenetrating rutile-related infinite frameworks in the structure of Zn[C(CN)3]2

    Stuart R. Batten;Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • An alternative to interpenetration whereby nets withlarge windows may achieve satisfactory space filling

    Stuart R. Batten;Bernard F. Hoskins;Boujemaa Moubaraki;Keith S. Murray

  • Structural chemistry of organotin carboxylates: II. The crystal structure of the dicarboxylato tetraorganodistannoxane:{sunBu2Sn(O2CC5H4N)]2O}2

    C.S. Parulekar;V.K. Jain;T.K. Das;A.R. Gupta

  • 2,4,6-Tri(4-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine as a 3-Connecting Building Block for Infinite Nets†

    Stuart R. Batten;Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson

  • Six Interpenetrating Quartz‐Like Nets in the Structure of ZnAu2(CN)4

    Bernard F. Hoskins;Richard Robson;Nicola V. Y. Scarlett

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Robson
Richard Robson University of Melbourne
Brendan F. Abrahams
Brendan F. Abrahams University of Melbourne
Stuart Robert Batten
Stuart Robert Batten Monash University
Edward R. T. Tiekink
Edward R. T. Tiekink Sunway University
Keith S. Murray
Keith S. Murray Monash University
Boujemaa Moubaraki
Boujemaa Moubaraki Monash University
Anthony Linden
Anthony Linden University of Zurich
Ray Colton
Ray Colton La Trobe University
Vimal K. Jain
Vimal K. Jain University of Mumbai
Anthony F. Hollenkamp
Anthony F. Hollenkamp Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various career paths, many of which intersect with forensic science and legal investigations. For students interested in applying chemistry knowledge to criminal investigations, earning a forensic science bachelor degree online can provide specialized skills that enhance job prospects and practical understanding.

For those aiming to advance their qualifications, exploring forensic psychology graduate programs online offers unique insights into the behavioral aspects of crime, complementing a strong chemistry background and expanding career opportunities in multidisciplinary teams.

Career pathways in forensic science are diverse, from lab analysis to field investigation. Understanding your options through resources on careers in forensic science can help align your education with roles that fit your interests and goals.

Additionally, specialized positions such as autopsy techs demand both technical expertise and an understanding of biological processes. If considering this route, researching how much do autopsy techs make provides valuable information about salary expectations and job outlook.

Combining chemistry with these related disciplines can create a strong foundation for a fulfilling career in science, law enforcement, or healthcare sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard F. Hoskins

Recently Published Articles