Toxins

Top Research Topics at Toxins?

The concepts of Mycotoxin, Microbiology, Biochemistry, Toxin and Aflatoxin are tackled in the journal. Contamination and Fusarium are some topics wherein Mycotoxin research discussed in Toxins have an impact. The studies on Microbiology discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Staphylococcus aureus, Bacteria and Gene, Virulence.

Toxins focuses on different Biochemistry studies like Venom and Peptide. Venom research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Zoology and Pharmacology. Most of the works presented in the journal deals with Aflatoxin but it intersects with the subject of Aspergillus flavus.

It is mostly focused on Food science, specifically Food contaminant.

• Mycotoxin (16.69%)
• Microbiology (14.18%)
• Biochemistry (12.62%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Mechanisms of Cisplatin nephrotoxicity. (885 citations)
• Food poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. (589 citations)
• Current Situation of Mycotoxin Contamination and Co-occurrence in Animal Feed—Focus on Europe (390 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Toxins:

The most cited articles are mainly concerned with subjects like Mycotoxin, Microbiology, Biochemistry, Toxin and Aflatoxin. Issues in Mycotoxin were discussed in the most cited papers, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Food contaminant and Fusarium. The most cited articles facilitate discussions on Microbiology that incorporate concepts from other fields like Enterotoxin, Secretion, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacteria and Virulence.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Toxins (based on the number of publications) are:

• Bryan G. Fry (40 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Sarah De Saeger (36 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Vitor Vasconcelos (33 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Michael Sulyok (31 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Luis M. Botana (29 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Toxins (based on the number of publications) are:

• Ghent University (89 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Queensland (84 papers) absent at the last edition,
• United States Department of Agriculture (84 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Chinese Academy of Sciences (75 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (58 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2022 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 0.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 100.00% of all publications and 0.00% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Further Fields of Study for Professionals Working with Toxins

A deeper look into the field of Toxins appeals to professionals in various careers, including medical practitioners. There has been a growing demand for incorporation of toxin-related studies in universities for courses like medical assisting. For instance, students in a medical assistant school in West Virginia can benefit from understanding different toxins, their effects, and their management. This knowledge can provide them with the necessary skills to deal with cases of toxin exposure that may not be covered in a standard medical assistant program.

Since mycotoxins, microbiology, biochemistry, toxins, and aflatoxin are key sub-fields presented in the Toxins journal, getting an overview of these topics in medical assistant programs will help students understand various aspects of toxins. Additionally, they could be potentially instrumental in managing cases involving food contaminants and bacterial virulence or even contribute to the advancement of toxin research later in their careers.

The incorporation of toxin-related studies in the curriculum might give future medical assistants an edge in real-life work scenarios and help to broadening the understanding and management of toxins in the medical field.