| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecology and Evolution | 281 | 34 | 50 | 13 |
The journal primarily focuses on research topics in Ecology, Zoology, Characiformes, Anatomy and Fishery. It explores research in Ecology and the adjacent study of Structural basin. The Structural basin study featured in the journal draws connections with the study of Tributary.
Zoology research featured in the journal incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Loricariidae, Catfish and Teleostei. Pimelodidae is a focus of the presented Catfish works and it dives deep in Pimelodidae. The studies tackled, which mainly focus on Characiformes, apply to Characidae as well.
Neotropical Ichthyology focused on Anatomy research but expanded to cover Fish fin. Fishery research presented is mostly focused on the subject of Fishing. The majority of Taxonomy (biology) studies presented zero in on Systematics.
The journal publications investigate areas of study like Ecology, Zoology, Fishery, Characidae and Characiformes. Teleostei, Ostariophysi and Karyotype are some topics wherein Zoology research discussed in the journal papers has an impact. In addition to Characiformes research, the journal papers aim to explore topics under Taxonomy (biology), Neotropical fish and Anatomy.
The aim of the journal is to expand the discussion of research in Ecology, Zoology, Fishery, Characiformes and Biodiversity. In addition to Ecology research, it aims to explore topics under Genetic structure and STREAMS. The work on Zoology tackled in Neotropical Ichthyology brings together disciplines like Species complex and Characidae.
The Fishery works featured in it incorporate elements from Hydropower, Tributary and Amazon rainforest. While work presented in Neotropical Ichthyology provided substantial information on Characiformes, it also covered topics in Neoteny and Near-threatened species. It addresses concerns in Biodiversity which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Endemism, IUCN Red List, Extinction and Aquaculture.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Neotropical Ichthyology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Neotropical Ichthyology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 10.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 66.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 14.81% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.11% of all publications and 7.41% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Valter M. Azevedo-Santos;Marlene S. Arcifa;Marcelo F. G. Brito;Angelo A. Agostinho
(2021)Angelo Antonio Agostinho;Diego Correa Alves;Luiz Carlos Gomes;Rosa Maria Dias
(2021)Fernando M. Pelicice;Andréa Bialetzki;Priscila Camelier;Fernando R. Carvalho
(2021)Ludmilla R. P. Alvarenga;Paulo S. Pompeu;Cecília G. Leal;Robert M. Hughes
(2021)Caio R. Pimentel;Caio R. Pimentel;Luiz A. Rocha;Bart Shepherd;Tyler A. Y. Phelps
(2020)Marina Rodrigues do Prado;Débora Reis de Carvalho;Carlos Bernardo Mascarenhas Alves;Marcelo Zacharias Moreira
(2020)André Lincoln B. Magalhães;Luis Artur V. Bezerra;Vanessa S. Daga;Fernando M. Pelicice
(2021)Lucas T. Nunes;Renato A. Morais;Renato A. Morais;Guilherme O. Longo;José Sabino
(2020)Victor A. Tagliacollo;Fernando Cesar Paiva Dagosta;Mário de Pinna;Roberto E. Reis
(2021)Daniel Tregidgo;Luke Parry;Jos Barlow;Paulo S. Pompeu
(2021)For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, expanding expertise through related health and management fields can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like cahiim accredited health information management programs online offer specialized knowledge in managing healthcare data, which is increasingly important in research and environmental health studies.
Similarly, those looking to enter clinical roles may consider accelerated nursing programs. These provide a fast-tracked route to nursing careers, allowing professionals to apply ecological and evolutionary insights in healthcare settings.
Certification plays a vital role in advancing healthcare careers, and understanding differences such as ccs vs cpc can help students choose the best path for coding and medical record management related to environmental health research.
Those with advanced degrees might explore specialization options through programs like the shortest online nurse practitioner program, blending clinical practice with ecological perspectives to impact public health.