| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 350 | 11 | 13 | 5 |
Nematology mostly deals with topics like Nematology, Botany, Nematode, Taxonomy (biology) and Morphometrics. Topics in Nematology were tackled in line with various other fields like Zoology, Agronomy and PEST analysis, Horticulture. Genus is a key component of Zoology research discussed in the journal.
Cultivar is a focus of the Agronomy works in Nematology. It explores issues in Botany which can be linked to other research areas like Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, Meloidogyne incognita, Root-knot nematode and Aphelenchoididae. Discussions in Nematology are anchored in the subject of Root-knot nematode and the similar topic of Terra incognita.
The Entomopathogenic nematode studies presented in the journal fall under the field of Nematode, but it also has connections to other fields such as Veterinary medicine. Research in Phylogenetics and the interrelating topic of Phylogenetic tree were among the subjects of interest in the Taxonomy (biology) studies discussed in it. Morphometrics research presented in Nematology encompasses a variety of subjects, including Dorylaimida, Spermatheca, Rostrum and Anatomy.
The most cited publications cover a variety of subjects, including Botany, Nematology, Nematode, Taxonomy (biology) and Ecology. Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, Xylophilus, Root-knot nematode, Horticulture and Meloidogyne incognita are some topics wherein Botany research discussed in the most cited publications has an impact. The most cited papers explore topics in Nematology which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Heterorhabditis, Entomopathogenic nematode, Biological pest control, Agronomy and PEST analysis.
Nematology investigates studies in Nematology, Botany, Nematode, Horticulture and Aphelenchoididae. Zoology and Agronomy, Resistance (ecology) are some topics wherein Nematology research discussed in the journal have an impact. While work presented in Nematology provided substantial information on Botany, it also covered topics in Bursaphelenchus, Anguinidae, Longidorus, Radopholus similis and Longidoridae.
It explores Nematode concepts, specifically Heteroderidae but expands to research in Humic acid. The journal addresses concerns in Horticulture which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Meloidogyne javanica, Ditylenchus destructor, Cryofixation and Meloidogyne incognita, Terra incognita. The featured Aphelenchoididae research zeroes in on concepts in Ruehmaphelenchus but also tackles themes under Xylocopa collaris.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Nematology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Nematology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 17.65% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 35.71% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.14% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.29% of all publications and 42.86% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Dandan Gao;Faming Wang;Jian Li;Shiqin Yu
(2020)Adrienne M. Gorny;Frank S. Hay;Paul Esker;Sarah J. Pethybridge
(2020)Isaac Lartey;Alexandra Kravchenko;Terence Marsh;Haddish Melakeberhan
(2021)Abdelfattah A. Dababat;Mustafa İmren;Göksel Özer;Fouad Mokrını
(2020)Pursuing a degree in Plant Science and Agronomy opens doors to diverse career pathways that focus on sustainable agriculture, crop management, and environmental stewardship. For those interested in expanding their expertise in related health and environmental fields, exploring accredited online programs can be a convenient way to advance your education.
Understanding the financial prospects in related careers is crucial. For example, many healthcare professionals explore the question, how much do dnp nurses make, to evaluate salary expectations across states. Similarly, accelerated online programs offer pathways for those looking to specialize quickly, such as the highly regarded accelerated fnp program.
If affordability and ease of admission are important factors, students may find value in exploring options like online dnp fnp programs and accredited online mph programs easy to get into. These programs often balance quality education with flexible admissions criteria, making them accessible for working professionals.
By integrating knowledge from plant sciences with public health and nursing, graduates can contribute to interdisciplinary solutions addressing global food security, environmental health, and community wellbeing.
