World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Klinische Monatsblatter für Augenheilkunde
H-index 8

Klinische Monatsblatter für Augenheilkunde

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Medicine 2957 23 55 6

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 53
Documents by Best Scientists*: 98
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 1
SCIMAGO H-index: 43
SCIMAGO SJR: 0.285
Impact Factor: N/A

Overview

Top Research Topics at Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde?

Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde focuses on Ophthalmology, Surgery, Eye disease, Visual acuity and Glaucoma. The Ophthalmology study featured in the journal draws parallels with the field of Retina. Vitrectomy is the primary subject of Surgery works presented in Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde.

It connects research in Eye disease with the related topic of Retinopathy.

  • Ophthalmology (25.59%)
  • Surgery (16.54%)
  • Eye disease (7.80%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • Determination of the real size of an object on the fundus of the living eye (396 citations)
  • Eine neue Lesetafel* zur gleichzeitigen Bestimmung von Lesevisus und Lesegeschwindigkeit (155 citations)
  • Theorie und Operationstechnik der Kapsulorhexis (144 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde:

The published articles generally zeroe in on subjects such as Ophthalmology, Surgery, Visual acuity, Eye disease and Glaucoma. In the Ophthalmology research discussed in the journal articles, Intraocular pressure, Cornea, Retinal, Retinal detachment and Intraocular lens are all tackled. While Visual acuity is the focus of the journal publications, it also provides insights into the studies of Optometry, Macular degeneration and Contrast (vision).

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Diabetes mellitus

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The journal tackles a plethora of topics, such as Ophthalmology, Gynecology, Glaucoma, Visual acuity and Surgery. The studies tackled, which mainly focus on Ophthalmology, apply to Choroid as well. Glaucoma and Intraocular pressure are closely related fields of research discussed in Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde.

The Visual acuity works, particularly on Vitrectomy are tackled in it. It focused on Surgery research but expanded to cover Cornea. Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde links adjacent topics like Retinal with Retina.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Artificial-Iris-Implantation bei iatrogenem Irisdefekt nach Kataraktoperation (5 citations)
  • Intravitreale Injektionen - welche Informationen aus dem Aufklarungsgesprach bleiben Patienten im Gedachtnis? (5 citations)
  • Diagnosis of Inherited Retinal Diseases. (4 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Gerd U. Auffarth (128 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
  • Jens Martin Rohrbach (118 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • Gerhard K. Lang (117 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
  • Berthold Seitz (103 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
  • Duy Thoai Pham (99 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde (based on the number of publications) are:

  • University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (275 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • University of Lausanne (166 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 8 more than at the previous edition,
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (155 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 8 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of Tübingen (104 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • Charité (98 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 9 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 40.62% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 39.10% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 21.80% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 18.80% of all publications and 20.30% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Implications and Future Directions

In this comprehensive review of research topics and trends in Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde, it is essential to discuss the implications of these findings and possible future directions. The study, application, and exploration of Ophthalmology and related fields such as Surgery, Visual acuity, Eye disease, and Glaucoma are evidently significant according to the data, creating potential avenues for future research and development. There is a noticeable correlation between the significant research topics and the persistent worldwide eye conditions, pointing towards a persistent need for further in-depth studies in these areas. The link between Eye disease and Retinopathy reveals a critical area of research, and it could provide insightful data to aid in the improvement of eye health globally. Future researchers might want to focus on eye conditions common in specific geographic demographics. For instance, addressing the eye care needs of populations in places like Connecticut could be invaluable. For instance, if you are interested in addressing the health care needs of populations in regions like Connecticut, considering a career in nursing might be a viable way to make a significant difference. You can scope through this link on how to become a nurse in Connecticut to start this journey. In conclusion, this topical analysis of published materials in Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde presents a distinct view of present trends in ophthalmology research. It is expected that these findings will aid in shaping the future direction of research in the field, informing practitioners' decisions, and ultimately contributing to improved global eye health.

Top Publications

  • ABCA4-Associated Stargardt Disease.

    Mubeen Khan;Frans P.M. Cremers

    (2020)
    22 Citations
  • Ocular Involvement in COVID-19: Conjunctivitis and More.

    Alexander C Rokohl;Rafael S Grajewski;Philomena A Wawer Matos;Adam Kopecky

    (2021)
    17 Citations
  • Real Life Data on Efficacy and Safety of Topical NGF Eye Drops (Cenegermin)

    Sarah Barbara Zwingelberg;Björn O Bachmann;Claus Cursiefen

    (2020)
    9 Citations
  • The Challenges of Treating Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

    Marlene Hollaus;Wolf Bühl;Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth;Stefan Sacu

    (2021)
    8 Citations
  • Central Ocular Motor Disorders: Clinical and Topographic Anatomical Diagnosis, Syndromes and Underlying Diseases.

    Michael Leo Strupp;Dominik Straumann;Christoph Helmchen

    (2021)
    8 Citations
  • Nystagmus: Diagnosis, Topographic Anatomical Localization and Therapy

    Michael Leo Strupp;Dominik Straumann;Christoph Helmchen

    (2021)
    7 Citations
  • Die Blut-Augen-Schranken und ihre Störungen: Anatomie, Physiologie, Pathologie

    (2023)
    6 Citations
  • Diagnostik der Neuromyelitis-optica-Spektrum-Erkrankung (NMOSD) und der MOG-Antikörper-assoziierten Erkrankung (MOGAD)

    (2022)
    5 Citations
  • Infectious Crystalline Keratopathy after Penetrating Keratoplasty with Light and Electron Microscopic Examination

    (2022)
    4 Citations
  • Augmented Reality in der Augenheilkunde: Technische Innovation ergänzt studentische Lehre

    Max Loidl;Achim Schneider;Oliver Keis;Wolfgang Öchsner

    (2020)
    4 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Medicine but exploring alternative career routes, health information roles offer promising opportunities. Medical coding and billing professionals play a vital role in healthcare administration, handling patient data and insurance claims. Understanding the differences between certifications is crucial, and the ccs vs cpc article provides clear insights into certification costs, requirements, and salary prospects to help prospective students make informed decisions.

Choosing a career in medical coding can lead to rewarding salary options and job stability. The guide on medical coding salary breaks down the earning potential and demand in various healthcare settings. Meanwhile, considering the medical billing and coding outlook article can highlight the daily responsibilities and challenges faced in this dual-role profession.

For those seeking flexible education options, a health information management degree online allows students to gain comprehensive knowledge while balancing other commitments. This degree serves as a strong foundation for entering the evolving healthcare information field, blending technology and patient care.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal

Recently Published Articles