| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 493 | 57 | 90 | 14 |
Judgment and Decision Making investigates areas of study like Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Econometrics and Preference. The journal focuses on Social psychology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Context (language use) and Risk perception, Perception. The Cognitive psychology study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Cognitive Reflection Test.
The work on Econometrics addressed in Judgment and Decision Making expands to the thematically related Statistics.
The journal papers focus largely on the fields of Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Econometrics and Perception. Developmental psychology and Morality are some topics wherein Social psychology research discussed in the most cited publications has an impact. The Cognition research presented in the published papers focuses mostly on Heuristics and, on occasion, topics in Machine learning.
The journal primarily focuses on research topics in Cognitive psychology, Preference, Social psychology, Statistics and Econometrics. While Judgment and Decision Making focused on Cognitive psychology, it was also able to explore topics like Credibility, Contrast (statistics), Replication (statistics), Eye tracking and Fluency. The studies in Preference featured incorporate elements of Dominance (ethology), Ingroups and outgroups, Attractiveness, Two-alternative forced choice and Dishonesty.
Most of the works presented in the journal deals with Social psychology but it intersects with the subject of Random assignment. It discusses concepts in Lottery and Factorial experiment under Statistics and how they intertwine with disciplines like Recipe, Vaccination and Function (mathematics). Intertemporal choice are all disciplines of Econometrics that connect with topics in Wisdom of crowds and Trait.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Judgment and Decision Making (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Judgment and Decision Making (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 82.35% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 50.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 33.33% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.67% of all publications and 0.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
A comprehensive understanding of Judgment and Decision Making can open doors for an exciting career in various fields, particularly the criminal psychology. For those who wish to explore this career path in the state of Georgia, our dedicated guide on how to become a criminal psychologist in Georgia provides detailed information on all the necessary steps—from the required education and licensing to potential job prospects within the state. By leveraging your knowledge in Judgment and Decision Making, you can contribute significantly to this important field, helping to analyze and understand the thought processes of lawbreakers, thereby aiding in their rehabilitation and contributing to societal safety.
Unknown
(2020)Bertram Gawronski;Paul Conway;Mandy Hütter;Dillon M. Luke
(2020)M. Asher Lawson;Richard P. Larrick;Jack B. Soll
(2020)Mark Himmelstein;Pavel Atanasov;David V. Budescu
(2021)For students interested in advancing their psychology careers, exploring related online degrees can provide flexible and affordable options. Many professionals pursue specialized fields like counseling, behavior analysis, or family therapy to broaden their expertise and career prospects.
If you aim to become a licensed professional counselor, consider some of the cheapest online LPC programs that offer accredited curricula designed to meet licensure requirements.
Similarly, those interested in Applied Behavior Analysis can find cost-effective training through online BCBA masters programs, equipping graduates for certification and clinical practice.
Marriage and family dynamics are also critical areas within psychology. The growing demand for relationship-focused therapists is met by family therapy degree programs that offer accessible learning paths nationwide.
Lastly, for those interested in clinical practice or research, affordable options exist through affordable online masters in clinical psychology, which provide comprehensive grounding in psychological theories and methods.
Exploring these related online degrees helps aspiring psychologists align their education with specific career goals while balancing cost and convenience.