| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 570 | 10 | 10 | 4 |
The aim of Journal of Field Archaeology is to expand the discussion of research in Archaeology, Excavation, Prehistory, Ancient history and Period (geology). Most of the works presented in Journal of Field Archaeology deals with Archaeology but it intersects with the subject of Settlement (litigation). The study on Settlement (litigation) presented in the journal intersects with the topics under Human settlement.
The journal articles mainly deal with areas of study such as Archaeology, Excavation, Prehistory, Period (geology) and Settlement (litigation). The presentations in the most cited publications discussing Archaeology offer insights in topics such as Maya, Human settlement, Pottery, Pleistocene and Subsistence agriculture. While the most cited articles focused on Excavation, they were also able to explore topics like Terrace (agriculture) and Radiocarbon dating.
Journal of Field Archaeology primarily focuses on research topics in Archaeology, Excavation, Prehistory, Bronze Age and Middle East. The journal focuses on Archaeology research which is adjacent to topics in Period (geology). Issues in Excavation were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Fragmentation (computing), Survey methodology, Drone and Urban archaeology.
The studies in Prehistory featured incorporate elements of Lament, Chalcolithic and Terracotta. While the journal focused on Bronze Age, it was also able to explore topics like Context (language use), Ecotone, Socioeconomics and Seasonality. Late Antiquity, Irrigation, Islam, Zooarchaeology and Politics are some topics wherein Middle East research discussed in the journal have an impact.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Field Archaeology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Field Archaeology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 2.70% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 5.56% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 22.22% of all publications and 55.56% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Grzegorz Michalec;Marzena Cendrowska;Eric Andrieux;Eric Andrieux;Simon J. Armitage;Simon J. Armitage
(2021)Jonathan A. Haws;Jonathan A. Haws;Michael M. Benedetti;Michael M. Benedetti;Caroline L. Funk;Nuno F. Bicho
(2020)Marta Osypinska;Piotr Osypinski;Zdzislaw Belka;Marek Chlodnicki
(2021)Michael J. Hambacher;Randall J. Schaetzl
(2021)Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career options that often require further education or certification. Many students benefit from programs offered by non profit university institutions, which provide quality education with an emphasis on student support and affordability.
For those balancing military commitments or veterans transitioning to civilian careers, selecting the best online college for military can make a significant difference. These colleges tailor their programs to accommodate military schedules and offer specialized resources.
Career advancement in Earth Science-related fields often involves obtaining certifications that validate expertise. Taking advantage of certifications that pay well can help professionals increase their marketability and earning potential with efficient paths to credentialing.
While not directly related to Earth Science, understanding how accredited programs work is important when considering any degree. For example, students interested in allied fields like speech therapy can refer to accredited speech language pathology programs to see how rigorous accreditation ensures quality education and licensure readiness.
