| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 199 | 47 | 66 | 15 |
| Medicine | 1673 | 74 | 93 | 15 |
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice was organized to reinforce research efforts on Health care, Nursing, Family medicine, Evidence-based medicine and MEDLINE. It addresses concerns in Health care which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Quality (business), Quality management and Context (language use). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice explores issues in Nursing which can be linked to other research areas like Audit, Qualitative research and Medical education.
Primary care is a focus of the presented Family medicine works and it dives deep in Primary care. While Evidence-based medicine is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Epistemology and Evidence-based practice. Research on Psychological intervention addressed in the journal frequently intersections with the field of Intervention (counseling).
The published papers primarily tackle Health care, MEDLINE, Nursing, Evidence-based medicine and Family medicine. The journal papers with studies in Health care featured incorporate elements of Quality (business), Quality management, Medical emergency and Public relations. The journal publications explore research in MEDLINE alongside concepts in Physical therapy and other areas of study in Randomized controlled trial and Quality of life.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice facilitates discussions on Health care, Psychological intervention, Family medicine, Evidence-based medicine and Context (language use). Topics in Health care explored in the journal were investigated in conjunction with research in Nursing, Public health, Engineering ethics and Public relations. The Nursing works featured in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice incorporate elements from Rehabilitation, Focus group and Best practice.
In Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Pharmacist, Intervention (counseling), Randomized controlled trial, Applied psychology and Meta-analysis are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Psychological intervention research. The journal deals with Family medicine in conjunction with MEDLINE and similar fields in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The research on Evidence-based medicine tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Epistemology and Sociology of scientific knowledge.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 5.48% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 22.71% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 4.35% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 13.53% of all publications and 59.42% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
To contribute to the body of knowledge encompassed by the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, publication guidelines must be strictly adhered to. With diverse fields including Health care, Nursing, Family medicine, and Evidence-based medicine, authors wishing to submit their research can find a fitting platform to connect with an informed audience. However, beyond having pulsating areas of study, becoming a contributing author requires a well-formed understanding of the field of interest, academic qualification, and field experience. For contributors who aim to explore counseling intervention strategies in their proposed writing, obtaining an LPC license in Indiana or equivalent could be instrumental in enriching the depth of perspective. Before submitting your manuscript, ensure that your content aligns closely with the Journal’s focus and always adhere strictly to manuscript format guidelines. All fellow researchers, academics, and field professionals are encouraged to augment the range and depth of knowledge expressed through the valuable platform provided by the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.
Olga C. Damman;Anant Jani;Brigit A. de Jong;Annemarie Becker;Annemarie Becker
(2020)Hu-Chen Liu;Hu-Chen Liu;Li-Jun Zhang;Ye-Jia Ping;Liang Wang
(2020)Trisha Greenhalgh
(2020)Aliki Thomas;Ayelet Kuper;Ayelet Kuper;Ayelet Kuper;Benjamin Chin-Yee;Melissa Park;Melissa Park
(2020)Frances Rapport;James Smith;Karen Hutchinson;Robyn Clay-Williams
(2021)Shayan Nabavi Nouri;Yosef A. Cohen;Mahesh V. Madhavan;Piotr J. Slomka
(2021)Joachim P Sturmberg;Linn O Getz;Kurt C Stange;Ross E G Upshur
(2021)Brett Williams;Bronwyn Beovich
(2020)For those interested in expanding their medical knowledge beyond traditional pathways, there are numerous online degree options that complement a career in medicine. For example, exploring psychiatric NP programs can lead to specialized roles in mental health care, a rapidly growing field.
Nutrition plays a crucial role in overall health, and accelerated dietitian programs offer an efficient route for those seeking to become experts in diet and wellness. These accelerated dietitian programs are designed to fast-track education while maintaining quality.
For healthcare professionals aspiring to management roles, pursuing an MBA in healthcare administration can be invaluable. Many students benefit from affordable options, such as those highlighted in cheap online MBA healthcare administration programs, which combine flexibility with cost-effectiveness.
Additionally, individuals without a nursing background can still enter the nursing field through accelerated nursing programs for non nurses. These programs provide a streamlined path to becoming a registered nurse, meeting the growing demand for qualified nurses nationwide.