| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 212 | 385 | 422 | 52 |
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle facilitates discussions on Internal medicine, Sarcopenia, Endocrinology, Cachexia and Skeletal muscle. Wasting, Cancer, Weight loss, Muscle atrophy and Body mass index are all aspects of Internal medicine discussed in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. It addresses concerns in Cancer which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Gastroenterology and Oncology.
While Sarcopenia is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Gerontology, Lean body mass, Hazard ratio, Confidence interval and Physical therapy. The journal connects the study in Confidence interval with the closely related area of Odds ratio. The work on Endocrinology tackled in it brings together disciplines like Inflammation, Heart failure and Atrophy.
The studies on Cachexia discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Clinical nutrition, Anorexia, Pathology, Bioinformatics and Intensive care medicine. It aims to form a more comprehensive understanding of the field by integrating disciplines like Clinical nutrition and Molecular medicine. It holds forums on Skeletal muscle that merges themes from other disciplines such as Myocyte, Cell biology, Ageing and Muscle weakness.
The journal publications explore disciplines such as Sarcopenia, Internal medicine, Cachexia, Endocrinology and Skeletal muscle. The published articles facilitate discussions on Internal medicine that incorporate concepts from other fields like Gastroenterology and Oncology. While Cachexia is the focus of the journal publications, it also provides insights into the studies of Pathology, Wasting, Weight loss and Intensive care medicine.
The aim of Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is to expand the discussion of research in Internal medicine, Sarcopenia, Skeletal muscle, Endocrinology and Cachexia. The tackled Internal medicine research is interrelated with Gastroenterology which concerns subjects like Lung cancer. Cardiology, Lean body mass, Grip strength, Confidence interval and Risk factor are some topics wherein Sarcopenia research discussed in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle have an impact.
In addition to Skeletal muscle research, Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle aims to explore topics under Myocyte, Cell biology and Inflammation. It dives deep in exploring the relationship between the study of Endocrinology and Mitochondrion. While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Cachexia, it also covered topics in Cancer research, Gut flora, Weight loss, MEDLINE and Wasting.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.76% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.17% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.98% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.77% of all publications and 55.09% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
While these research topics are important from an academic perspective, it is also crucial to consider their application in professional healthcare settings. Many health professionals such as nurse practitioners, use research findings from journals to improve patient outcomes, especially in areas like sarcopenia and cachexia. One application area is in the state of Pennsylvania, where nurse practitioners follow specific standards of care that align with research topics in internal medicine, sarcopenia, cachexia, and skeletal muscle disorders. In order to become a nurse practitioner in Pennsylvania, there are specific education and certification requirements to meet. These include a Registered Nurse (RN) license, a Master's degree in nursing, and a particular number of clinical hours. Understanding the latest research from the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle can aid their practice. For instance, the updated findings on sarcopenia can inform the physiological assessments and interventions implemented by nurse practitioners. Likewise, the insights on wasting and cancer can guide strategies to mitigate weight loss in cachexic patients. If you are interested in learning more about becoming a nurse practitioner in Pennsylvania, and the type of research that will guide your practice, check out the nurse practitioner program requirements pennsylvania. This resource is also beneficial for those currently in the profession looking to deepen their understanding of research applications in the field. Remember, translating clinical research into practice is a key component of providing quality patient care, especially in complex areas such as cachexia and sarcopenia where further research and understanding are continuously required.
Fanny Petermann-Rocha;Fanny Petermann-Rocha;Fanny Petermann-Rocha;Viktoria Balntzi;Stuart R Gray;Jose Lara
(2021)Chaoran Liu;Wing-Hoi Cheung;Jie Li;Simon Kwoon-Ho Chow
(2021)John E. Morley;Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh;Stefan D. Anker
(2020)Hamid Mollazadeh;Erfan Tavana;Giovanni Fanni;Simona Bo
(2021)Sarianna Sipilä;Timo Törmäkangas;Elina Sillanpää;Pauliina Aukee
(2020)Hidetaka Wakabayashi;Hidenori Arai;Akio Inui
(2021)Yasunori Akamatsu;Toru Kusakabe;Hiroshi Arai;Yuji Yamamoto
(2021)For those interested in expanding their medical knowledge and career options beyond an MD, nursing degrees offer diverse and flexible pathways. Many aspiring nurses start with an associate degree and progress through accelerated programs. The asn to np route is a popular bridge for registered nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners, combining advanced clinical training with patient care skills.
For individuals without prior nursing experience, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online offer an efficient way to enter the nursing profession at an advanced level. These programs are designed to build foundational nursing knowledge quickly and prepare students for leadership or specialized roles.
When considering online BSN programs, it’s important to compare institutions carefully. Reviews like chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program provide valuable insights into curriculum quality, flexibility, and accreditation status, helping students choose what fits their career goals and learning style.
Moreover, for registered nurses planning to advance further, affordable options like rn to bsn to msn online programs make it easier to earn a master’s degree while balancing work and personal commitments. These pathways are crucial for career growth and specialization in the evolving healthcare landscape.
