World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Family Court Review
H-index 5

Family Court Review

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Psychology 1040 15 21 5

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 18
Documents by Best Scientists*: 27
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 0
SCIMAGO H-index: 52
SCIMAGO SJR: 0.268
Impact Factor: N/A

Overview

Top Research Topics at Family Court Review?

Family Court Review investigates studies in Law, Social psychology, Family law, Mediation and Criminology. Family court, Conciliation, State (polity), Statute and Legislation are among the concentrations of Law that garnered much attention in the journal. The journal explores topics in Social psychology which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Developmental psychology, Child custody, Public relations and Mental health.

Studies in Criminology and Domestic violence are the key highlights in the journal. Family Court Review facilitated discussions that integrated Domestic violence and Occupational safety and health.

  • Law (30.37%)
  • Social psychology (18.58%)
  • Family law (13.68%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • DIFFERENTIATION AMONG TYPES OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE: RESEARCH UPDATE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS (508 citations)
  • THE ALIENATED CHILD:A Reformulation of Parental Alienation Syndrome (281 citations)
  • USING CHILD DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH TO MAKE APPROPRIATE CUSTODY AND ACCESS DECISIONS FOR YOUNG CHILDREN (156 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Family Court Review:

The journal publications are organized to reinforce research efforts on Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Child custody, Domestic violence and Suicide prevention. The most cited publications hold forums on Social psychology that merge themes from other disciplines such as Context (language use), Mediation, Family law, Mental health and Family court. The published papers address concerns in Developmental psychology which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Parental alienation, Alienation, Affect (psychology) and Clinical psychology.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Law
  • Social psychology
  • China

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The scientific interests tackled in Family Court Review are Law, Family law, Therapeutic jurisprudence, Criminology and Justice (ethics). Topics in Family law explored in it were investigated in conjunction with research in Embryo cryopreservation, Online dispute resolution, Andrology, Control (management) and Evidence-based practice. The Criminology study presented in the journal encompasses related topics like Restorative justice and also examines its connection to subjects such as Domestic violence, Sexual assault and Commit.

Intimate partner abuse research are fields of study within Domestic violence but they also intertwine with concepts in Spouse, Joint and several liability and Best interests. It tackles topics on Alternative dispute resolution, which can potentially contribute to the wider field of Mediation. The work on Mediation tackled in it brings together disciplines like Context (language use), Psychiatry and Moderation.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Beneficial and Ethical ODR for Family Issues (2 citations)
  • The Development, Evaluation, and Implementation of Parenting-Focused Prevention Programs in Collaboration with Family Court (1 citations)
  • Establishing Ethical Standards for Online Family Mediation (1 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Family Court Review (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Andrew Schepard (43 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Meyer Elkin (33 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Robert E. Emery (24 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Janet R. Johnston (20 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Marsha Kline Pruett (20 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Family Court Review (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Hofstra University (85 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • University of Toronto (22 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Arizona State University (18 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
  • University of Virginia (18 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Harvard University (16 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 98.44% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 100.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 0.00% of all publications and 0.00% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Prospects and Development in Family Court Research

If you're interested in delving deeper into Criminology and Family Law, you might want to consider becoming a professional in the field. It's essential to understand the educational requirements and career path involved. For instance, if you're based in South Dakota, you can check our detailed guide on how to become a forensic investigator in South Dakota, a relevant career that intersects with the topics discussed in the Family Court Review. Acquiring the necessary qualifications and experience not only equips you with the expertise to contribute meaningfully to such research subjects but also opens a world of opportunities for you. You'll be able to participate actively in tackling family court-related issues and directly impact the research studies investigated in Law, Social Psychology, Family Law, Mediation, and Criminology. Moreover, by actively participating in this field, you will find yourself in a position to contribute to the most cited papers and involve yourself in the crucial discussions taking place in this domain. And who knows – perhaps you can one day author a widely recognized and highly cited research paper in Family Court Review yourself. However, all of these begin with the first step of understanding the educational and developmental path to becoming a professional in the field. Use our guide as your initial stepping stone into this rewarding line of work.

Top Publications

  • Effects of an asynchronous, fully web‐based parenting‐after‐divorce program to reduce interparental conflict, increase quality of parenting and reduce children's post‐divorce behavior problems

    (2022)
    8 Citations
  • Perspectives of Mothers, Fathers, and Parenting Coordinators Concerning the Process and Impact of Parenting Coordination

    James P. McHale;Debra K. Carter;Marthanne Miller;Linda Fieldstone

    (2020)
    8 Citations
  • Reducing the Scientific Bench to Judicial Bench Research-to-Practice Gap: Applications of Implementation Science to Family Law Research and Practice

    Brittany N. Rudd;Rinad S. Beidas

    (2021)
    7 Citations
  • Building and Enhancing Efficacious Coparenting in Parenting Coordination

    Barbara Jo Fidler;James McHale

    (2020)
    7 Citations
  • Preparing Mediators to Mediate Cases Reporting High IPV in a Randomized Controlled Trial: The Importance of a Mediation Manual, Training, and Consultation

    Amy G. Applegate;Connie J. Beck;Jeannie M. Adams;Fernanda S. Rossi

    (2021)
    5 Citations
  • The Development, Evaluation, and Implementation of Parenting-Focused Prevention Programs in Collaboration with Family Court

    Karey L. O'Hara;Sharlene A. Wolchik;Irwin N. Sandler

    (2021)
    5 Citations
  • Sexual orientation, gender identity, and foster care: What can social science offer in a case like <scp><i>Fulton v. City of Philadelphia</i></scp>?

    (2021)
    4 Citations
  • Partner Physical Aggression and Risk for Physical Child Abuse

    K. Daniel O'Leary;Ernest N. Jouriles

    (2021)
    4 Citations
  • Lessons for a <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 era: Barriers and facilitators to court ordered online parenting programs for divorcing and separating parents

    (2022)
    3 Citations
  • Enhancing daily affect in youth experiencing high‐conflict parental divorce: A multiple baseline trial of an online prevention program

    (2022)
    3 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in psychology offers diverse pathways, many of which can now be accessed through flexible online programs. For those starting out, a bachelors in psychology online serves as a cost-effective and convenient foundation. These programs cover essential theories and research methods, preparing students for further specialization or entry-level roles.

Graduate degrees often open doors to advanced clinical or counseling careers. Online programs like the how long does it take to get a msw online provide key insights into the duration and requirements of completing a Master of Social Work, which typically ranges from one to three years depending on the pace chosen.

For those aiming for clinical psychology licensure, exploring the cheapest psyd programs can make earning a Doctor of Psychology more accessible and affordable. These programs emphasize hands-on clinical experience alongside rigorous academic training.

Additionally, the online masters mft options offer a focused route for students seeking licensure as Marriage and Family Therapists, often featuring accelerated timelines to complete the degree.

Choosing the right online degree involves balancing affordability, duration, and career goals. These pathways reflect the growing demand for mental health professionals equipped with flexible and accredited education options.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal

Recently Published Articles