| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 288 | 192 | 158 | 12 |
| Environmental Sciences | 439 | 158 | 117 | 11 |
The primary areas of discussion in Eos are Oceanography, Astrobiology, Climatology, Meteorology and Earth (chemistry).
The main points discussed in the journal publications deal with Oceanography, Data science, Ecology, Geophysics and Environmental resource management. The published papers with studies in Oceanography featured incorporate elements of Fishery and Sargassum, Algae. Issues in Ecology were discussed in the published papers, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Caste and Diversity (business).
Astrobiology, Oceanography, Seismology, Earth (chemistry) and Climate change are the subjects of interest in the journal.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Eos (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Eos (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 100.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, nan% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another nan% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included nan% of all publications and nan% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Manfred Wendisch;Drthe Handorf;Ina Tegen;Roel Neggers
(2021)Rebecca Batchelor;Hendratta Ali;Kathryn Gardner-Vandy;Anne Gold
(2021)Alex Chow;Tanju Karanfil;Randy Dahlgren
(2021)Alice Hill;Mylne Jacquemart;Anne Gold;Kristy Tiampo
(2021)Jacob Bortnik;Enrico Camporeale
(2021)Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse online educational programs and career pathways that complement environmental work. For example, integrating a best online EHS programs can prepare students for roles focused on workplace and community health, enhancing their ability to manage environmental risks effectively.
Career transitions may also lead to fields like behavioral health, where a behavioral analysis degree provides a foundation for analyzing human behavior patterns in relation to environmental factors. Alternatively, professionals interested in community and family dynamics might explore online options such as the best online MFT programs to build skills in marriage and family counseling.
Understanding the scope of mental health professions is also vital. Reviewing the types of therapist degrees available can help students align their career goals with relevant counseling credentials that intersect with environmental wellbeing.
These pathways highlight the interdisciplinary nature of environmental sciences, offering flexible, online learning options that cater to various interests and professional aspirations.
