2211-3398
Published by: Elsevier
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/current-opinion-in-chemical-engineering
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 278 | 113 | 115 | 27 |
| Engineering and Technology | 412 | 57 | 66 | 19 |
Current opinion in chemical engineering tackles a plethora of topics, such as Nanotechnology, Process (engineering), Biochemical engineering, Membrane and Chemical engineering. Current opinion in chemical engineering explores issues in Nanotechnology which can be linked to other research areas like Catalysis, Adsorption and Polymer. While it focused on Process (engineering), it was also able to explore topics like Risk analysis (engineering) and Process engineering.
The study on Biochemical engineering presented in the journal intersects with the topics under Bioprocess.
The most cited articles primarily tackle Nanotechnology, Membrane, Waste management, Chemical engineering and Polymer. Aside from discussions in Nanotechnology, the journal papers also deal with the subject of Biochemical engineering which intersects with Process (engineering) disciplines. While the primary focus in the most cited articles is Chemical engineering, they also dissect topics surrounding Organic chemistry and Biomass as a whole.
The scientific interests tackled in the journal are Computer-aided, Risk analysis (engineering), Engineering design process, Artificial intelligence and Chemical industry. Risk analysis (engineering) study tackled is connected to the field of Quality (business). The Engineering design process works featured in the journal incorporate elements from Work (electrical) and Management science.
In it, Extraction (chemistry), Extractive distillation, Solvent, Stochastic optimization and Process engineering are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Chemical industry research. It aims to form a more comprehensive understanding of the field by integrating disciplines like Paradigm shift and Process (engineering). Current opinion in chemical engineering blends together research topics in Process (engineering) and Crystalline materials.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Current opinion in chemical engineering (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Current opinion in chemical engineering (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2022 edition, 18.18% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 11.11% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.11% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.11% of all publications and 66.67% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Alexandra M Oliveira;Rebecca R Beswick;Yushan Yan
(2021)Selma Atilhan;Sunhwa Park;Mahmoud M El-Halwagi;Mert Atilhan
(2021)Fadhil Y Al-Aboosi;Mahmoud M El-Halwagi;Margaux Moore;Rasmus B Nielsen
(2021)Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda;Megan Ginn;Vandita Rastogi
(2020)Teng Zhou;Teng Zhou;Kevin McBride;Steffen Linke;Zhen Song;Zhen Song
(2020)Lei Zhang;Haitao Mao;Qilei Liu;Rafiqul Gani
(2020)Gang Nie;Gang Nie;Yu Yao;Xiaoguang Duan;Ling Xiao
(2021)For students pursuing Chemistry in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals enhance their qualifications with interdisciplinary studies. For instance, nursing students often seek the best RN to BSN programs to advance their healthcare knowledge, which complements chemical and pharmaceutical expertise.
Accelerated healthcare programs are also gaining popularity. Those interested in pharmaceutical sciences might consider enrolling in accelerated PharmD programs that fast-track their path into pharmacy careers. These programs leverage a strong foundation in chemistry, creating a smoother transition into professional practice.
Beyond traditional roles, chemistry graduates can explore lucrative options like becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative. Understanding how to combine scientific knowledge with business skills is key. Helpful insights on how to get into pharmaceutical sales offer practical guidance on entering this field.
Another growing pathway involves medical billing and coding. With healthcare digitization, certification programs are essential. Learning about the CPC medical coding salary and career outlook can help chemistry students diversify their skills and job prospects.