| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 65 | 400 | 837 | 84 |
The journal mainly tackles studies in Internal medicine, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Randomized controlled trial and Cochrane Library. The research on Internal medicine tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Placebo and Surgery. The journal investigates Placebo research which frequently intersects with Anesthesia.
The studies on Meta-analysis discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Physical therapy, Quality of life and Systematic review. Research on Physical therapy addressed in it frequently intersections with the field of Physical medicine and rehabilitation. Childbirth, Pediatrics and Obstetrics are some topics wherein Relative risk research discussed in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews have an impact.
Research in the field of MEDLINE was used to conduct the presented Cochrane Library study. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews addresses concerns in MEDLINE which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Psychological intervention and Intensive care medicine. The Psychological intervention works featured in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews incorporate elements from Intervention (counseling) and Family medicine.
The journal publications facilitate discussions on Meta-analysis, Internal medicine, Cochrane Library, Randomized controlled trial and Relative risk. In addition to Meta-analysis research, the most cited articles aim to explore topics under Psychological intervention, Clinical trial, MEDLINE, Physical therapy and Pediatrics. While work presented in the journal articles provide substantial information on Internal medicine, it also covers topics in Placebo, Surgery and Oncology.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews facilitates discussions on Internal medicine, Relative risk, Clinical trial, Adverse effect and Psychological intervention. Presentations on Internal medicine include those discussing Meta-analysis and Odds ratio. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews explores topics in Relative risk which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Randomized controlled trial and Cochrane Library.
Concepts in Quality of life, as well as related topics in Physical therapy, are covered in the Adverse effect research presented in the journal. In addition to Psychological intervention research, the journal aims to explore topics under Intervention (counseling), Gerontology and Intensive care medicine. The journal links adjacent topics like Confidence interval with MEDLINE.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.81% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 35.38% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 14.15% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 18.77% of all publications and 31.69% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
While the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews offers invaluable scientific findings in various medical fields, its practical implications in real-world medical practice deserve a closer look. The research encompassed in the journal also influences specific sectors of healthcare, particularly nursing.
For example, the studies conducted on Internal Medicine and Meta-analysis can have direct applications in nursing practice. These studies may provide insights on administering better patient care, devising effective procedures in critical situations, and carrying out surgeries more safely with improved outcomes.
Moreover, the insights from the Cochrane Database could be instrumental for academics designing curriculum for the best online nursing programs in Oregon. The constantly evolving nature of healthcare demands state-of-the-art education for aspiring nurses, allowing them to stay updated on the latest developments and advance in their careers with strong fundamental and advanced knowledge.
As the field of medicine continues to progress, the research spotlighted in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews will continue to influence not only scientific knowledge but practical functions within the medical field as well. It will undoubtedly pave the way for more effective, efficient, and enriched healthcare practices in real-world scenarios.
Jacqueline Dinnes;Jacqueline Dinnes;Jonathan J. Deeks;Ada Adriano;Sarah Berhane
(2020)Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit;Verena Mayr;Andreea Iulia Dobrescu;Andrea Chapman
(2020)Jonathan J Deeks;Jonathan J Deeks;Jacqueline Dinnes;Jacqueline Dinnes;Yemisi Takwoingi;Yemisi Takwoingi;Clare Davenport;Clare Davenport
(2020)Thomas Struyf;Jonathan J Deeks;Jonathan J Deeks;Jacqueline Dinnes;Jacqueline Dinnes;Yemisi Takwoingi;Yemisi Takwoingi
(2020)James M N Duffy;Kirana Arambage;Frederico J S Correa;David Olive
(2020)Unknown
(2020)For those interested in advancing their medical careers in the USA, there are several online degree options worth exploring. Many registered nurses (RNs) seek to enhance their qualifications quickly, making an rn to bsn in 6 months an attractive choice. These programs offer accelerated timelines without compromising quality, allowing nurses to step into broader clinical roles efficiently.
For ADN holders aiming to expand their responsibilities, the pathway from ADN to advanced practice roles like nurse practitioners is well supported by adn to np programs. These bridge programs help professionals gain the necessary education and credentials to deliver higher-level patient care.
Individuals without a nursing background interested in becoming advanced practice nurses can consider direct entry msn programs online. These offerings allow non-nurses to earn a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) degree quickly, opening doors to various clinical and leadership roles.
Choosing the right school is crucial for success in these programs. For example, prospective students often compare options to decide which school is better snhu vs wgu, considering factors such as curriculum, flexibility, and accreditation. Careful research ensures the best fit for career goals and learning style.
