World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
H-index 26

Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Medicine 851 356 632 25

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 606
Documents by Best Scientists*: 877
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 21
SCIMAGO H-index: 46
SCIMAGO SJR: 0.805
Impact Factor: 2.6

Overview

Top Research Topics at Clinical nutrition ESPEN?

The journal mainly tackles studies in Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, Malnutrition, Surgery and In patient. The work on Internal medicine tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Oncology. The work on Intensive care medicine presented in the journal focuses on Parenteral nutrition in particular.

The studies tackled, which mainly focus on Malnutrition, apply to Pediatrics as well.

  • Internal medicine (30.17%)
  • Intensive care medicine (10.50%)
  • Malnutrition (10.09%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • The role of artificial and natural sweeteners in reducing the consumption of table sugar: A narrative review. (88 citations)
  • A review of the validity of malnutrition screening tools used in older adults in community and healthcare settings - A MaNuEL study. (79 citations)
  • Effects of a lipid emulsion containing fish oil on polyunsaturated fatty acid profiles, growth and morbidities in extremely premature infants: A randomized controlled trial (72 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Clinical nutrition ESPEN:

The most cited articles facilitate discussions on Internal medicine, Malnutrition, Gastroenterology, Surgery and Randomized controlled trial. Internal medicine research in the most cited articles connects with the study of Placebo. In addition to Malnutrition research, the most cited articles aim to explore topics under Multivariate analysis, Pediatrics, Nutritional status and Gerontology.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Disease

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The objective of Clinical nutrition ESPEN is to combine knowledge in the areas of Internal medicine, Malnutrition, Obesity, Body mass index and Parenteral nutrition. Topics in Internal medicine explored in it were investigated in conjunction with research in Gastroenterology and Endocrinology. While it focused on Malnutrition, it was also able to explore topics like Medical nutrition therapy, Pediatrics and Family medicine.

More specifically, the research on Parenteral nutrition in it is related to Enteral administration. The journal addresses concerns in Randomized controlled trial which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Placebo and Clinical trial. While work presented in Clinical nutrition ESPEN provided substantial information on Meta-analysis, it also covered topics in MEDLINE and Confidence interval.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Nutritional status assessment in patients with Covid-19 after discharge from the Intensive Care Unit (13 citations)
  • Trajectories of eating behavior during COVID-19 lockdown: Longitudinal analyses of 22,374 adults. (8 citations)
  • Nutraceuticals for the treatment of sarcopenia in chronic liver disease. (7 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Clinical nutrition ESPEN (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Simon Lal (27 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 9 less than at the previous edition,
  • Pedro T. Ramirez (23 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Larissa A. Meyer (23 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Javier Lasala (22 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Allyson Cochran (21 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Clinical nutrition ESPEN (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (45 papers) published 15 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • University of São Paulo (37 papers) published 17 papers at the last edition, 14 more than at the previous edition,
  • Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (32 papers) published 15 papers at the last edition, 6 more than at the previous edition,
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (27 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Harokopio University (26 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 10.49% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 21.14% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.57% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 12.86% of all publications and 57.43% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Journal Impact

The article lacks important information about the impact of the Clinical nutrition ESPEN journal in the scientific community. This information is significant because it gives readers insight into the recognition and influence of the journal's published research. The impact of a journal is mainly assessed by its Impact factor (IF), which is calculated based on the average number of times its articles are cited in a specific period. Acknowledging the impact of Clinical nutrition ESPEN could cast light on how influential the journal's published research is in the scientific community, specifically in fields like internal medicine, intensive care medicine, and malnutrition, which constitute a significant part of the journal's focus. If you are considering a career in medicine or healthcare, recognizing the impact of prestigious medical journals is crucial. Aligning your academic and professional journey with publications of high importance can contribute to your success in the field. For instance, if you are thinking of studying nursing, it would be beneficial to look into the best nursing schools in Minnesota where you can have access to such authoritative journals and broaden your knowledge in the field. Moreover, understanding the impact of the journal can be beneficial to established researchers in selecting suitable journals for publishing their research and to students for referencing in their academic work. A journal's high impact factor indicates the high credibility of its content, valuable for research or study purposes. With knowledge of the journal's impact, readers can evaluate the extent of the journal's contribution to advancements in medical and healthcare research. Please note, this section requires accurate statistical data on the journal's impact factor, number of citations, and other relevant metrics. Therefore, ensure to include such data in the final version of this section. The specific impact factor of Clinical nutrition ESPEN, statistics on citations and the comparison with other related journals will further enrich this added section.

Top Publications

  • Prevalence and severity of malnutrition in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

    Dorothée Bedock;Pierre Bel Lassen;Alexis Mathian;Pauline Moreau

    (2020)
    175 Citations
  • Screening, diagnosis and monitoring of sarcopenia: When to use which tool?

    (2022)
    99 Citations
  • A national survey of oncology survivors examining nutrition attitudes, problems and behaviours, and access to dietetic care throughout the cancer journey.

    Erin S. Sullivan;Niamh Rice;Elaine Kingston;Aoife Kelly

    (2021)
    89 Citations
  • Effects of nutritional interventions on nutritional status in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Emanuele Rinninella;Marco Cintoni;Pauline Raoul;Carmelo Pozzo

    (2020)
    75 Citations
  • Trajectories of eating behavior during COVID-19 lockdown: Longitudinal analyses of 22,374 adults.

    Moritz Herle;Andrea D. Smith;Feifei Bu;Andrew Steptoe

    (2021)
    74 Citations
  • Effects of curcumin on body weight, glycemic control and serum lipids in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Mehri Jamilian;Fatemeh Foroozanfard;Elham Kavossian;Esmat Aghadavod

    (2020)
    70 Citations
  • Equation models developed with bioelectric impedance analysis tools to assess muscle mass: A systematic review.

    Charlotte Beaudart;Olivier Bruyère;Anton Geerinck;Manon Hajaoui

    (2020)
    70 Citations
  • The effect of long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on muscle mass and function in sarcopenia: A scoping systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Julia K. Bird;Barbara Troesch;Ines Warnke;Philip C. Calder

    (2021)
    68 Citations
  • Dietary total antioxidant capacity and its association with sleep, stress, anxiety, and depression score: A cross-sectional study among diabetic women.

    Elnaz Daneshzad;Seyed-Ali Keshavarz;Mostafa Qorbani;Bagher Larijani

    (2020)
    61 Citations
  • Curcumin administration and the effects on psychological status and markers of inflammation and oxidative damage in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease

    Rana Shafabakhsh;Moein Mobini;Fariba Raygan;Esmat Aghadavod

    (2020)
    47 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Medicine in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diversified career opportunities within healthcare. Programs like rad tech online programs offer a focused path into radiologic technology, combining convenience with hands-on clinical experience.

Nutrition plays a vital role in health, and pursuing one of the top dietetics programs in the us can prepare students for a rewarding career as registered dietitians, influencing patient care through personalized dietary planning.

For individuals seeking direct patient care roles with flexible learning options, online medical assisting classes provide essential training, often with financial aid, making healthcare education more accessible.

Additionally, advancing from a medical assistant to a licensed practical nurse is streamlined through the ma to lpn bridge program online. This pathway helps enhance clinical skills and expand career options within nursing.

Exploring these related degrees can complement a traditional medical education or serve as standalone gateways into healthcare professions, supporting diverse interests and long-term career growth.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal

Recently Published Articles