0816-4622
Published by: Taylor & Francis
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showAxaArticles?journalCode=tceo20
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 2290 | 17 | 80 | 11 |
Clinical and Experimental Optometry covers a variety of subjects, including Optometry, Ophthalmology, Optics, Visual acuity and Contact lens. Accommodation and Refractive error are some topics wherein Optometry research discussed in it have an impact. The in-depth study on Ophthalmology also explores topics in the intersecting field of Surgery.
The work on Optics presented in the journal focuses on Lens (optics) in particular.
The most cited papers are mainly concerned with subjects like Optometry, Ophthalmology, Contact lens, Optics and Visual acuity. The Optometry research tackled in the journal articles is interrelated with Refractive error which concerns subjects like Strabismus. Many of the studies tackled in the published papers connect Ophthalmology with a similar field of study like Surgery.
The journal mainly tackles studies in Ophthalmology, Optometry, Clinical significance, Optical coherence tomography and Dermatology. Ophthalmology studies presented include Retinal, Visual acuity, Cornea, Lens (anatomy) and Optic nerve. The studies on Optometry discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Contact lens and Refractive error.
The Dermatology study featured in the journal draws parallels with the field of Disease.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Clinical and Experimental Optometry (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Clinical and Experimental Optometry (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 8.47% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 37.44% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.45% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 19.82% of all publications and 31.28% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
While the topics of study at Clinical and Experimental Optometry have wide-ranging impacts on health science fields such as Optometry, Ophthalmology, Optics, Visual acuity, and Contact lens, the implications and use of these research findings extend beyond these areas. The practical benefit of this research can be seen when applied in related avenues like nurse practitioners' education and training, particularly in states like Idaho that report a shortage of primary care providers. For instance, research on visual acuity may be leveraged to better diagnose and manage patients with visual impairment and eye diseases in a clinical setting by nurse practitioners. Nurse practitioners may apply the knowledge gained from papers discussing contact lenses to advise patients on proper lens care, thereby reducing the risk of complications such as eye infections. Furthermore, findings from the orthokeratology review and update research can be integrated into the educational curriculum of np programs in idaho to enhance bedside care delivered by these practitioners. Therefore, not only does this research contribute to advancement in specific health sciences, it also provides crucial knowledge that can be implemented in interdisciplinary fields, thereby improving overall patient healthcare and experience. This furthers the journal's influence, by reaching healthcare providers across different fields, and indicates the widespread significance of research in Clinical and Experimental Optometry.
Mark D.P. Willcox;Karen Walsh;Jason J. Nichols;Philip B. Morgan
(2020)Ioannis N Petropoulos;Georgios Ponirakis;Adnan Khan;Hoda Gad
(2020)Craig A Woods;Nathan Efron;Philip Morgan
(2020)Amanda Douglass;Amanda Douglass;Peter R Keller;Mingguang He;Laura E Downie
(2020)Nathan Efron;Philip B Morgan;Lyndon W Jones;Lyndon W Jones;George A Morgan
(2021)Shyam Sunder Tummanapalli;Mark D. P. Willcox
(2021)Nathan Efron;Philip B Morgan;Lyndon W Jones;Lyndon W Jones;Jason J Nichols
(2021)Nathan Efron;Philip B Morgan;Lyndon W Jones;Lyndon W Jones;Jason J Nichols
(2021)Pursuing Medicine in the USA often opens doors to various allied health careers, especially in nursing. Many professionals seek accelerated routes to advance their credentials efficiently. For instance, a 6-month rn to bsn program offers a fast track for registered nurses to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing online.
For those aiming to become Nurse Practitioners, bridge programs exist that facilitate a smooth transition, such as an adn to np programs. These pathways help nurses leverage their Associate Degree in Nursing into a Master’s, positioning them for advanced practice roles.
Interestingly, some individuals without a nursing background can enter nursing at the graduate level through direct entry msn programs for non nurses online. These programs cater to career changers who want to pursue nursing without starting over at the undergraduate level.
When choosing the best online nursing degree route, comparisons such as capella vs wgu rn to bsn offer valuable insights into program quality, flexibility, and outcomes, helping students make informed decisions that align with their career goals.
