Bunseki Kagaku

Top Research Topics at Bunseki Kagaku?

The concepts of Chromatography, Inorganic chemistry, Analytical chemistry, Nuclear chemistry and Environmental chemistry are tackled in Bunseki Kagaku. Bunseki Kagaku concentrated on Chromatography research, specifically High-performance liquid chromatography, Gas chromatography and Ion chromatography. Topics in Inorganic chemistry explored in the journal were investigated in conjunction with research in Ion and Copper.

Atomic absorption spectroscopy is part of Analytical chemistry studies tackled in the journal.

• Chromatography (21.65%)
• Inorganic chemistry (19.10%)
• Analytical chemistry (18.94%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• POST-COLUMN FLUOROMETRIC DETECTION OF REDUCING SUGARS IN HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY USING ARGININE (160 citations)
• Color Reaction Between Pyrogallol Red - Molybdenum(VI) Complex and Protein (115 citations)
• Analytical Chemistry for Environmental and Human Health. Determination of the geographic origin of brown-rice with trace-element composition. (63 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Bunseki Kagaku:

The main points discussed in the journal publications deal with Chromatography, Inorganic chemistry, Analytical chemistry, Nuclear chemistry and Environmental chemistry. Most of the works presented in the most cited papers deal with Chromatography but they intersect with the subject of Reagent. While Nuclear chemistry is the focus of the most cited articles, it also provides insights into the studies of Spectrophotometry and Atomic absorption spectroscopy.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Organic chemistry
• Oxygen
• Enzyme

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Chromatography, Chemical engineering, Solid phase extraction, Electrochemical detection and Quantitative analysis (chemistry) are among the topics commonly tackled in the journal. More specifically, the research on Chromatography in the journal is related to Lc ms ms. Topics in Chemical engineering were tackled in line with various other fields like Microelectrode, Electrophoretic deposition, Ionic liquid, Carbon monoxide and Catalytic combustion.

The journal addresses concerns in the field of Solid phase extraction by exploring it in line with topics in Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry which intersect with Environmental water, Chelating resin, Uranium and Radiochemistry subjects. Bunseki Kagaku holds forums on Electrochemical detection that merges themes from other disciplines such as Methylene blue, Redox cycling, Periodontal disease and Microbiology. The journal explores issues in Quantitative analysis (chemistry) which can be linked to other research areas like Environmental chemistry, Liquid–liquid extraction, Surface water and Fatty acid.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Sensitive Determination of Hexavalent Chromium Using a Microfluidic Paper-based Analytical Device with Solid Phase Extraction (1 citations)
• Development of a Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Avermectin Anthelmintics and Polyether Antibiotics Using LC-MS/MS (0 citations)
• Analyses of Iridium(III) and Ruthenium(II) Phosphorescent Complexes with LC-TOFMS and LC-MS/MS (0 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Bunseki Kagaku (based on the number of publications) are:

• Tsugio Takeuchi (71 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Shoji Motomizu (66 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Toshiyuki Hobo (52 papers) absent at the last edition,
• 渡辺 邦洋 (43 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Hiroshi Nishida (42 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Bunseki Kagaku (based on the number of publications) are:

• Kyushu University (78 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• University of Tokyo (71 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Tohoku University (45 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Tokyo University of Science (43 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Industrial Research Institute (35 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 9.26% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 20.41% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.16% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 36.73% of all publications and 34.69% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.