0305-1978
Published by: Elsevier
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/biochemical-systematics-and-ecology
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecology and Evolution | 765 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
The main points discussed in Biochemical Systematics and Ecology deals with Botany, Chemotaxonomy, Ecology, Genetic diversity and Zoology. The Botany study featured in Biochemical Systematics and Ecology draws connections with the study of Flavonoid. Research in Chemotaxonomy discussed is concerned with the study of Taxonomy (biology) as a whole.
While the journal focused on Genetic diversity, it was also able to explore topics like Genetics, Microsatellite and Genetic variation. Phylogenetic tree, Allele, Locus (genetics) and Gene are all areas of Genetics tackled in the journal. The work tackled in the journal goes beyond the discipline of Zoology as it also encompasses Genetic distance.
Most of the works presented in Biochemical Systematics and Ecology deals with Genus but it intersects with the subject of Phytochemical.
The most cited publications generally zeroe in on subjects such as Botany, Chemotaxonomy, Essential oil, Ecology and Lamiaceae. In the Botany research discussed in the journal articles, Chemotype, Asteraceae, Genus, Sesquiterpene and Taxon are all tackled. The study of Ecology in the published articles encompasses disciplines such as Zoology, as well as fields such as Genetic diversity, all of which overlap with one another.
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology generally zeroes in on subjects such as Phytochemical, Botany, Chemical constituents, Genus and Stereochemistry. The Phytochemical works featured in it incorporate elements from Phenolic acid, Glycoside, Alkaloid, Caprifoliaceae and Triterpenoid. It features studies on Botany, including topics such as Essential oil.
In the journal, Fabaceae and Flavonoid are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Chemical constituents research. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology connects the study in Genus with the closely related area of Ericaceae. The work on Stereochemistry tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Stigmasterol, Anthraquinones and Fatty acid.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Biochemical Systematics and Ecology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Biochemical Systematics and Ecology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 9.45% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 8.70% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 4.35% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.78% of all publications and 72.17% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Beligh Mechri;Meriem Tekaya;Mohamed Hammami;Hechmi Chehab
(2020)Nemanja Rajčević;Tanja Dodoš;Jelica Novaković;Pedja Janaćković
(2020)Seyed Mehdi Talebi;Mehry Askary;Nariman Khalili;Alex Matsyura;Alex Matsyura
(2021)Claudio Frezza;Alessandro Venditti;Claudia Giuliani;Sebastiano Foddai
(2021)Gokhan Zengin;Kouadio Ibrahim Sinan;Gunes Ak;Simone Angeloni
(2021)Hussein Muklada;Hussein Muklada;Rachel Davidovich-Rikanati;Dustin G. Wilkerson;Joshua D. Klein
(2020)Bruna Silvestroni Pimentel;Giuseppina Negri;Inês Cordeiro;Lucimar Barbosa Motta
(2020)For students interested in Biology and Biochemistry, exploring related fields such as counseling and psychology can offer diverse career opportunities. One viable online route is pursuing the cheapest master's in counseling online, which provides affordable access to advanced training without compromising quality.
Specializing further, programs like clinical mental health counseling offer accelerated tracks, enabling students to enter the workforce sooner. These programs equip graduates with essential skills to support mental wellness, complementing biochemical and biological understanding of human health.
For those passionate about childhood development, online child psychologist masters programs provide focused curricula that bridge biology, chemistry, and psychological theory to better serve young populations.
Additionally, the lpc masters programs online prepare students for licensure as professional counselors, integrating scientific knowledge with practical counseling techniques. These pathways highlight how online education can expand career options beyond traditional lab roles into impactful healthcare and counseling professions.
