| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 362 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Ecology and Evolution | 595 | 17 | 22 | 5 |
The scientific interests tackled in the journal are Systematics, Botany, Plant taxonomy, Taxonomy (biology) and Systematic Botany. While Systematics is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Taxon, Genus and Monophyly. The work on Monophyly tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Paraphyly, Polyphyly and Molecular phylogenetics.
It links adjacent topics like Botany with Phylogenetics. In addition to Plant taxonomy research, the journal aims to explore topics under Plant genetics, Lichen, Conservation status, Gnaphalieae and Type species. Issues in Taxonomy (biology) were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Evolutionary biology, Cladistics, Phylogenetic tree, Subspecies and Herbarium.
Phylogenetic tree works presented in it have a specific focus on Clade. It facilitated presentations on Ecology research, particularly Biogeography, Plant ecology and Endemism.
The published articles are organized to address concerns in the fields of Systematics, Botany, Taxonomy (biology), Plant taxonomy and Ecology. The majority of Systematics studies presented in the most cited papers zero in on Systematic Botany. The most cited articles focus on Plant taxonomy but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Lichen and Nomenclature.
The topics of Genus, Botany, Taxonomy (biology), Ecology and Evolutionary biology are the focal point of discussions in Australian Systematic Botany. Australian Systematic Botany explores research in Botany alongside concepts in Molecular phylogenetics and other areas of study in Amanitaceae, Amanita and Secotioid. Systematics is a focus of the Taxonomy (biology) works in the journal.
The close relationship between Monsoon and Riccia, Tropics, Ricciaceae and Marchantiophyta is one of the points of interest dissected in Ecology research. The journal holds forums on Evolutionary biology that merges themes from other disciplines such as Plant genetics, Taxon, Genetic structure, Genetic variation and Phylogeography. Plant taxonomy research is concerned with Systematic Botany in particular.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Australian Systematic Botany (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Australian Systematic Botany (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 23.53% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 76.92% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 15.38% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 0.00% of all publications and 7.69% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Martin W. Callmander;Sven Buerki;Frank A. Zich;Frank A. Zich;Ashley R. Field
(2021)Todd G. B. McLay;Todd G. B. McLay;Todd G. B. McLay;Pauline Y. Ladiges;Stephen R. Doyle;Stephen R. Doyle;Michael J. Bayly
(2021)Brendan C. Wilde;Susan Rutherford;Susan Rutherford;Marlien van der Merwe;Megan L. Murray
(2020)Russell L. Barrett;Russell L. Barrett;Russell L. Barrett;Paul M. Peterson;Konstantin Romaschenko;Konstantin Romaschenko
(2020)Timothy A. Hammer;Timothy A. Hammer;Michael Renton;Ladislav Mucina;Ladislav Mucina;Kevin R. Thiele
(2021)For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond Plant Science and Agronomy, related fields such as nutrition and health sciences offer promising career pathways. Pursuing a accelerated nurse practitioner program can fast-track your transition into healthcare, blending biology with patient care expertise.
If you already hold a nursing degree, consider advancing with an msn to dnp program to gain specialized skills that align well with agricultural health initiatives and community wellness.
For those seeking a focus on nutrition, enrolling in the cheapest online nutrition degree provides an affordable path to understanding the science behind food systems and sustainable diets.
Additionally, a nutritional science degree online offers flexibility for students aiming to integrate nutritional knowledge with plant-based research and agricultural innovation.
Exploring these related online degrees can equip you with interdisciplinary skills that enhance career versatility in agriculture, healthcare, and environmental sustainability.
