International Conference on Management of Data (MOD)

The scientific conference ranking presented on this page provides a comprehensive evaluation of conferences within the field of Computer Science. Developed by Research.com, a widely recognized authority in science research for all major disciplines since 2014, this ranking leverages trusted, data-driven methodologies to deliver insightful and reliable information on scientific contributions.

Each conference's position in the ranking is determined by a unique bibliometric score created by Research.com. This score is carefully calculated based on the estimated h-index, reflecting the impact and quality of research, and the number of leading scientists who have appeared at the conference during the past three years. The result is a rigorous assessment that balances both quantitative and qualitative measures of conference excellence.

The impact scores and data utilized for this ranking were gathered on 2024-11-27, ensuring the results reflect the most up-to-date and relevant performance information. The compilation and analysis process involved systematic examination of more than 2,742 scientific conferences, which were meticulously selected after an extensive review and in-depth analysis of over 148,739 scientific documents published in the last three years by 13,184 distinguished and leading researchers in Computer Science.

This ranking is the product of a thorough and expert-driven process, emphasizing the remarkable depth of analysis and the high standards maintained by the Research.com team. More information regarding the detailed methodology employed for computing the ranking scores can be found on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at International Conference on Management of Data (based on the number of publications) are:

• Marianne Winslett (96 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Michael Stonebraker (80 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Surajit Chaudhuri (74 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Divesh Srivastava (70 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• Michael J. Carey (69 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at International Conference on Management of Data (based on the number of publications) are:

• IBM (465 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Microsoft (408 papers) published 25 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• University of Wisconsin-Madison (230 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 8 less than at the previous edition,
• Stanford University (190 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of California, Berkeley (187 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.33% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 20.69% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 14.73% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 26.33% of all publications and 38.24% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.