World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
48747
World Ranking
7334
National Ranking
3191

Sam T. Roweis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam T. Roweis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 74 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sam T. Roweis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam T. Roweis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Sam T. Roweis was affiliated with New York University in the United States. Over the course of their academic career, they contributed to the field in ways reflected through various roles at this institution.

They received the Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation award in 2005, marking a recognized milestone in their academic pursuits.

Their research profile does not include published papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues in the provided data. Similarly, no specific fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, or book publications were listed.

Although detailed records of their research topics and collaborative efforts are unavailable, their affiliation with a major academic institution suggests active involvement in the scientific community prior to their passing.

Best Publications

  • Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding.

    Sam T. Roweis;Lawrence K. Saul

  • Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning

    William Cohen;Andrew McCallum;Sam Roweis

  • Removing camera shake from a single photograph

    Rob Fergus;Barun Singh;Aaron Hertzmann;Sam T. Roweis

  • Neighbourhood Components Analysis

    Jacob Goldberger;Geoffrey E. Hinton;Sam T. Roweis;Ruslan R Salakhutdinov

  • Think globally, fit locally: unsupervised learning of low dimensional manifolds

    Lawrence K. Saul;Sam T. Roweis

  • Stochastic Neighbor Embedding

    Geoffrey E. Hinton;Sam T. Roweis

  • K-corrections and filter transformations in the ultraviolet, optical, and near infrared

    Michael R. Blanton;Sam Roweis

  • A unifying review of linear Gaussian models

    Sam Roweis;Zoubin Ghahramani

  • EM Algorithms for PCA and SPCA

    Sam T. Roweis

  • Astrometry.net: Blind Astrometric Calibration of Arbitrary Astronomical Images

    Dustin Lang;Dustin Lang;David W. Hogg;David W. Hogg;Keir Mierle;Keir Mierle;Michael Blanton

  • Modeling Human Motion Using Binary Latent Variables

    Graham W. Taylor;Geoffrey E. Hinton;Sam T. Roweis

  • Metric Learning by Collapsing Classes

    Amir Globerson;Sam T. Roweis

  • An Improved Photometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data

    Nikhil Padmanabhan;Nikhil Padmanabhan;David J. Schlegel;David J. Schlegel;Douglas P. Finkbeiner;Douglas P. Finkbeiner;J. C. Barentine;J. C. Barentine

  • One Microphone Source Separation

    Sam T. Roweis

  • Nightmare at test time: robust learning by feature deletion

    Amir Globerson;Sam Roweis

  • A sticker-based model for DNA computation.

    Sam T. Roweis;Erik Winfree;Richard Burgoyne;Nickolas V. Chelyapov

  • Learning Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Using an EM Algorithm

    Zoubin Ghahramani;Sam T. Roweis

  • A Panoramic View of Yeast Noncoding RNA Processing

    Wen Tao Peng;Mark D. Robinson;Sanie Mnaimneh;Nevan J. Krogan

  • An Introduction to Locally Linear Embedding

    Lawrence K. Saul;Sam T. Roweis

  • Global Coordination of Local Linear Models

    Sam T. Roweis;Lawrence K. Saul;Geoffrey E. Hinton

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. Hogg
David W. Hogg Max Planck Society
Zoubin Ghahramani
Zoubin Ghahramani University of Cambridge
Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Ruslan Salakhutdinov Carnegie Mellon University
Erik Winfree
Erik Winfree California Institute of Technology
Amir Globerson
Amir Globerson Tel Aviv University
Geoffrey E. Hinton
Geoffrey E. Hinton University of Toronto
Radford M. Neal
Radford M. Neal University of Toronto
Michael R. Blanton
Michael R. Blanton New York University
Douglas P. Finkbeiner
Douglas P. Finkbeiner Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens a range of related online degree options that can advance your career prospects. Many students search for the cheapest online colleges to make their education more affordable, as tuition costs and financial aid opportunities vary widely.

If you’re interested in technical fields, you might consider an online bachelor's in engineering. These programs offer flexibility and are ideal for those aiming to specialize in areas like software, hardware, or systems engineering.

For those pursuing advanced leadership roles, an online executive mba cost is a crucial factor to weigh. Executive MBAs can help computer science professionals move into management or technology strategy positions.

Additionally, interdisciplinary interests can be served by an mlis online program. This pathway suits those who wish to blend information science principles with technology and digital data management.

Best Scientists Citing Sam T. Roweis

Recently Published Articles