World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard R. Forster

Richard R. Forster

Richard R. Forster publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard R. Forster sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Richard R. Forster D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard R. Forster sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard R. Forster is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their primary field of study is Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant focus on Atmospheric Science. Additional subfields include Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Water Science and Technology, and Mechanics of Materials. The scientist's research spans multiple topics related to cryospheric and climate studies, land hazards, and hydrology.

Forster's research topics include:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Forster illustrate a concentration on firn aquifers, snowmelt progression, and meltwater drainage in polar and mountainous regions. Notable recent papers include:

  • Hydrology of a Perennial Firn Aquifer in Southeast Greenland: An Overview Driven by Field Data (2020), published in Water Resources Research
  • Hydrologic Properties of a Highly Permeable Firn Aquifer in the Wilkins Ice Shelf, Antarctica (2020), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Mapping Snowmelt Progression in the Upper Indus Basin With Synthetic Aperture Radar (2020), published in Frontiers in Earth Science
  • Direct Observation of Winter Meltwater Drainage From the Greenland Ice Sheet (2020), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Interpreting Sentinel-1 SAR Backscatter Signals of Snowpack Surface Melt/Freeze, Warming, and Ripening, through Field Measurements and Physically-Based SnowModel (2022), published in Remote Sensing

Frequent collaboration is evident with several co-authors, including Summer Rupper, C. Miège, Olivia Miller, D. Kip Solomon, and Lynn Montgomery. These partnerships contributed to a range of studies in glaciology, hydrology, and remote sensing applied to cryospheric environments.

Forster's work has been published regularly in high-impact venues such as Water Resources Research, Geophysical Research Letters, Frontiers in Earth Science, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America, and IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

Best Publications

  • Extensive liquid meltwater storage in firn within the Greenland ice sheet

    Richard R. Forster;Jason E. Box;Jason E. Box;Michiel R. van den Broeke;Clement Miege

  • Efficient meltwater drainage through supraglacial streams and rivers on the southwest Greenland ice sheet.

    Laurence C. Smith;Vena W. Chu;Kang Yang;Colin J. Gleason

  • A spatially calibrated model of annual accumulation rate on the Greenland Ice Sheet (1958-2007)

    Evan W. Burgess;Richard R. Forster;Jason E. Box;Ellen Mosley-Thompson

  • Fusion of hyperspectral and radar data using the IHS transformation to enhance urban surface features

    C.-M. Chen;G.F. Hepner;R.R. Forster

  • Firn meltwater retention on the Greenland Ice Sheet: a model comparison

    Christian R. Steger;Carleen H. Reijmer;Michiel R. van den Broeke;Nander Wever

  • Estimation of discharge from braided glacial rivers using ERS 1 synthetic aperture radar: first results

    L. C. Smith;B. L. Isacks;R. R. Forster;A. L. Bloom

  • Spatial extent and temporal variability of Greenland firn aquifers detected by ground and airborne radars

    Clément Miège;Richard R. Forster;Ludovic Brucker;Ludovic Brucker;Lora S. Koenig

  • Flow velocities of Alaskan glaciers

    Evan W. Burgess;Richard R. Forster;Christopher F. Larsen

  • Initial in Situ Measurements of Perennial Meltwater Storage in the Greenland Firn Aquifer

    Lora S. Koenig;Clément Miège;Richard R. Forster;Ludovic Brucker;Ludovic Brucker

  • Explaining the presence of perennial liquid water bodies in the firn of the Greenland Ice Sheet

    P. Kuipers Munneke;S. R. M. Ligtenberg;M. R. van den Broeke;J. H. van Angelen

  • Sediment plume response to surface melting and supraglacial lake drainages on the Greenland ice sheet

    Vena W. Chu;Laurence C. Smith;Asa K. Rennermalm;Richard R. Forster

  • Evidence of meltwater retention within the Greenland ice sheet

    A. K. Rennermalm;L. C. Smith;V. W. Chu;J. E. Box

  • Annual Greenland accumulation rates (2009–2012) from airborne snow radar

    Lora S. Koenig;Alvaro Ivanoff;Patrick M. Alexander;Joseph A. MacGregor

  • InSAR results from the RADARSAT Antarctic Mapping Mission data: estimation of glacier motion using a simple registration procedure

    A.L. Gray;K.E. Mattar;P.W. Vachon;R. Bindschadler

  • Interferometric radar observations of Glaciar San Rafael, Chile

    Eric Rignot;Richard Forster;Bryan Isacks

  • Southeast Greenland high accumulation rates derived from firn cores and ground-penetrating radar

    Clément Miège;Richard R. Forster;Jason E. Box;Evan W. Burgess

  • Surge dynamics on Bering Glacier, Alaska, in 2008–2011

    E. W. Burgess;R. R. Forster;C. F. Larsen;M. Braun

  • Monitoring snowpack evolution using interferometric synthetic aperture radar on the North Slope of Alaska, USA

    Elias J. Deeb;Richard R. Forster;Douglas L. Kane

  • The onset of Arctic sea-ice snowmelt as detected with passive- and active-microwave remote sensing

    Richard R. Forster;David G. Long;Kenneth C. Jezek;Sheldon D. Drobot

  • Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Balance Reconstruction. Part I: Net Snow Accumulation (1600–2009)

    Jason E. Box;Noel Cressie;David H. Bromwich;Ji Hoon Jung

  • Evidence of Meltwater Retention within the Greenland Ice Sheet

    A. K. Rennermalm;L. C. Smith;V. W. Chu;J. E. Box

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurence C. Smith
Laurence C. Smith Brown University
Jason E. Box
Jason E. Box Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Ludovic Brucker
Ludovic Brucker National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Anatoly Legchenko
Anatoly Legchenko Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Stefan R. M. Ligtenberg
Stefan R. M. Ligtenberg Utrecht University
Ronald L. Bruhn
Ronald L. Bruhn University of Utah
Bryan L. Isacks
Bryan L. Isacks Cornell University
Hans-Peter Marshall
Hans-Peter Marshall Boise State University
Kenneth C. Jezek
Kenneth C. Jezek The Ohio State University
Carl J. Legleiter
Carl J. Legleiter United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens diverse career opportunities that often intersect with other fields, such as technology, language, and the arts. For instance, combining Earth Science with skills in visual documentation can enhance research and communication. Students interested in this may explore an online degree in photography, which offers affordable programs to build expertise in capturing scientific phenomena.

Veterans looking to transition into educational pathways related to Earth Science have unique options as well. Programs like an photography degree online for veterans provide tailored support, making it easier to gain new skills aligned with career goals.

Language skills are increasingly important in global scientific collaboration. Pursuing short Spanish degrees online can offer not only linguistic proficiency but also improve employability in cross-border environmental projects.

Additionally, veterans interested in language acquisition can benefit from specialized programs like online Spanish degree programs for veterans. These programs help bridge gaps and support integration into Earth Science careers requiring bilingual competence.

Best Scientists Citing Richard R. Forster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles