World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard Dams

Richard Dams

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 53 13201 165 272 8810

Richard Dams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Dams between 1961 and 2010, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Dams published across 50 years, from 1961 to 2010, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1996. 3 of the 286 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2010. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1996. 1961: 1 publication 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 4 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 1 publication 1967: 2 publications 1968: 7 publications 1969: 5 publications 1970: 7 publications 1971: 5 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 5 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 7 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 13 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications
1961 2010

286 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Dams: publications per year, 1961 to 2010
Year Publications
1961 1
1962 1
1963 0
1964 4
1965 1
1966 1
1967 2
1968 7
1969 5
1970 7
1971 5
1972 4
1973 5
1974 5
1975 7
1976 3
1977 3
1978 2
1979 2
1980 4
1981 6
1982 5
1983 6
1984 5
1985 13
1986 7
1987 4
1988 8
1989 10
1990 12
1991 6
1992 12
1993 14
1994 15
1995 15
1996 16
1997 14
1998 10
1999 8
2000 9
2001 6
2002 5
2003 1
2004 1
2005 4
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 0
2010 3
Total 286
Download as CSV

Richard Dams publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Dams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 272 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979 272
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Dams D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Dams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872 53
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard Dams is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium. Their academic profile and research contributions are documented primarily through their association with this institution.

A detailed record of their published papers, frequent co-authors, main and subfields of study, topics of work, and awards is not available, indicating either a focus on other aspects of their academic involvement or limited data coverage.

Despite the absence of specific publication details, it is evident that Richard Dams maintains an active academic presence within Ghent University, which is known for its research activities across various scientific disciplines.

The lack of publicly listed frequent co-authors or publication venues suggests either a relatively independent research path or contributions to collaborative projects not captured in common research databases.

Similarly, no specific awards have been recorded, which may reflect an early or specialized stage in their academic career or a focus on contributions beyond widely recognized accolades.

Richard Dams is currently an active researcher and has not been reported deceased.

Best Publications

  • Raman spectroscopic database of azo pigments and application to modern art studies

    Peter Vandenabeele;Luc Moens;Howell Gm Edwards;Richard Dams

  • The use of internal standards in ICP-MS.

    Frank Vanhaecke;Hans Vanhoe;Richard Dams;Carlo Vandecasteele

  • Sensitive, Simultaneous Determination of Organomercury, -lead, and -tin Compounds with Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction Capillary Gas Chromatography Combined with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

    Luc Moens;Tom De Smaele;Richard Dams;Paul Van Den Broeck

  • Determination of iron, cobalt, copper, zinc, rubidium, molybdenum, and cesium in human serum by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

    Hans. Vanhoe;Carlo. Vandecasteele;Jacques. Versieck;Richard. Dams

  • Sodium tetra(n-propyl)borate: a novel aqueous in situ derivatization reagent for the simultaneous determination of organomercury, -lead and -tin compounds with capillary gas chromatography–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    Tom De Smaele;Luc Moens;Richard Dams;Patrick Sandra

  • Determination of trace elements in agricultural soil samples by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: Microwave acid digestion versus aqua regia extraction

    Samuel Melaku;Richard Dams;Luc Moens

  • ‘Zone model’ as an explanation for signal behaviour and non-spectral interferences in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    Frank Vanhaecke;Richard Dams;Carlo Vandecasteele

  • Precise Measurement of Isotope Ratios with a Double-Focusing Magnetic Sector ICP Mass Spectrometer

    Frank Vanhaecke;Luc Moens;Richard Dams;Philip Taylor

  • Evaluation of a commercially available microconcentric nebulizer for inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    Frank Vanhaecke;Mirja van Holderbeke;Luc Moens;Richard Dams

  • Speciation of six arsenic compounds using capillary electrophoresis-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    Mirja Van Holderbeke;Yining Zhao;Frank Vanhaecke;Luc Moens

  • Spectral interferences encountered in the analysis of biological materials by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    Hans Vanhoe;Jan Goossens;Luc Moens;Richard Dams

  • Dependence of detector dead time on analyte mass number in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    Frank Vanhaecke;Günther de Wannemacker;Luc Moens;Richard Dams

  • Elimination of interferences in the determination of arsenic and selenium in biological samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    Jan Goossens;Frank Vanhaecke;Luc Moens;Richard Dams

  • Comparison of the collection and desorption efficiency of activated charcoal, silver, and gold for the determination of vapor-phase atmospheric mercury

    Ronny. Dumarey;Richard. Dams;Julien. Hoste

  • EFFECT OF SOLVENT TYPE ON THE DETERMINATION OF TOTAL IODINE IN MILK POWDER AND HUMAN SERUM BY INDUCTIVELY-COUPLED PLASMA-MASS SPECTROMETRY

    Hans Vanhoe;Françoise Van Allemeersch;Jacques Versieck;Richard Dams

  • Spectral and non-spectral interferences in inductively coupled plasma mass-spectrometry

    Richard F. J. Dams;Jan Goossens;Luc Moens

  • Distribution of platinum group elements (Pt, Pd, Rh) in environmental and clinical matrices: Composition, analytical techniques and scientific outlook: Status report.

    Torsten Hees;Bernd Wenclawiak;Sönnke Lustig;Peter Schramel

  • Some figures of merit of a new double focusing inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer

    Luc Moens;Frank Vanhaecke;Jörgen Riondato;Richard Dams

  • Applicability of High-Resolution ICP−Mass Spectrometry for Isotope Ratio Measurements

    Frank Vanhaecke;Luc Moens;Richard Dams;Ioannis Papadakis

  • Improved Sealed-Tube Combustion of Organic Samples to CO2 for Stable Carbon Isotope Analysis, Radiocarbon Dating and Percent Carbon Determinations

    Kurt Vandeputte;Luc Moens;Richard Dams

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Vanhaecke
Frank Vanhaecke Ghent University
Luc Moens
Luc Moens University of Antwerp
Pat Sandra
Pat Sandra Ghent University
Norbert Lameire
Norbert Lameire Ghent University Hospital
Raymond Vanholder
Raymond Vanholder Ghent University
Martín Resano
Martín Resano University of Zaragoza
Freddy Adams
Freddy Adams University of Antwerp
Marc Verloo
Marc Verloo Ghent University
Johannes van der Plicht
Johannes van der Plicht University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens up numerous career opportunities across various industries. Many students and professionals explore related online degrees to diversify their skills and increase employability. For example, those interested in legal aspects may look into paralegal programs, with insights into paralegal salary potential driving their decisions.

In the pharmaceutical sector, Chemistry graduates can transition into roles such as pharmaceutical sales representatives. Understanding how much do drug reps make helps set realistic career and salary expectations in this specialized sales field.

For those aiming for more clinical positions, becoming a pharmacist is a well-established pathway. It is essential to consider how long does it take to become a pharmacist when planning your education and career trajectory, as it requires significant time and commitment.

Another niche yet critical role for Chemistry graduates is in forensic science, where positions such as autopsy technicians play a vital role. Learning more about autopsy technician jobs can provide valuable insight into education requirements, salary expectations, and job outlook in this field.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Dams

Recently Published Articles