World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
12462
World Ranking
12011
National Ranking
682

Mary McPartlin publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary McPartlin sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 583 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Mary McPartlin D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary McPartlin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary McPartlin is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Materials Science with a specialization in Materials Chemistry. The core topics addressed in their work include Crystallization and Solubility Studies as well as X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography.

Their publication record includes contributions to The Cambridge Structural Database, the main venue where their work has appeared. A recent paper authored by McPartlin, titled "CCDC 2221991: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination," was published in 2022 in The Cambridge Structural Database.

Collaboration has featured in McPartlin's research, with frequent co-authors including Robin Payne, Ronald J. Oberts, R.C. Rowe, and Allan Bashal.

  • The Cambridge Structural Database

  • CCDC 2221991: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination (2022, The Cambridge Structural Database)

  • Robin Payne
  • Ronald J. Oberts
  • R.C. Rowe
  • Allan Bashal

  • Materials Science

  • Materials Chemistry

  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

Best Publications

  • Technetium-99m-tetrofosmin as a new radiopharmaceutical for myocardial perfusion imaging.

    Kelly Jd;Forster Am;Higley B;Archer Cm

  • Assembly and Crystal Structure of a Photoactive Array of Five Porphyrins

    Sally Anderson;Harry L. Anderson;Alan Bashall;Mary McPartlin

  • An Aluminum Ate Base: Its Design, Structure, Function, and Reaction Mechanism

    Hiroshi Naka;Masanobu Uchiyama;Yotaro Matsumoto;Andrew E H Wheatley

  • Novel cluster complexes of gold(0)–gold(I)

    Unknown

  • Unsupported Ti-Co and Zr-Co bonds in heterobimetallic complexes: a theoretical description of metal-metal bond polarity

    Georg Jansen;Martin Schubart;Bernd Findeis;Lutz H. Gade

  • Improved syntheses of the hexanuclear clusters [Ru6(CO)18]2–, [HRu6-(CO)18]–, and H2Ru6(CO)18. The X-ray analysis of [HRu6(CO)18]–, a polynuclear carbonyl containing an interstitial hydrogen ligand

    Colin R. Eady;Peter F. Jackson;Brian F. G. Johnson;Jack Lewis

  • The synthesis of [Ru5C(CO)15] by the carbonylation of [Ru6C(CO)17] and the reactions of the pentanuclear cluster with a variety of small molecules: the X-ray structure analyses of [Ru5C(CO)15], [Ru5C(CO)15(MeCN)], [Ru5C(CO)14(PPh3)], [Ru5C(CO)13(PPh3)2], and [Ru5(µ-H)2C(CO)12{Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2}]

    Brian F. G. Johnson;Jack Lewis;J. Nicola Nicholls;José Puga

  • Cooperative reactivity of early-late heterodinuclear transition metal complexes with polar organic substrates

    Lutz H. Gade;Harald Memmler;Uta Kauper;Andreas Schneider

  • Chemistry of phosphido-bridged dimolybdenum complexes. Part 3. Reinvestigation of the reaction between [Mo2(η-C5H5)2(CO)6] and P2Ph4; X-ray structures of [Mo2(η-C5H5)2(µ-PPh2)2(CO)2], [Mo2(η-C5H5)2(µ-PPh2)2(µ-CO)], and trans-[Mo2(η-C5H5)2(µ-PPh2)2O(CO)]

    Trushar Adatia;Mary McPartlin;Martin J. Mays;Michael J. Morris

  • Titanium Complexes with Tripodal Amido Ligands: Building Blocks for Stable Bimetallic Coordination Compounds Containing Highly Polar Metal–Metal Bonds

    Stefan Friedrich;Harald Memmler;Lutz H. Gade;Wan‐Sheung Li

  • Steric Control of the Electronic Ground State in Six-Coordinate Copper(II) Complexes.

    Nayan K. Solanki;Eric J. L. McInnes;Frank E. Mabbs;Sanja Radojevic

  • Titanium and Zirconium Complexes Containing a Novel Dianionic Trifunctional Amido Ligand

    Stefan Friedrich;Martin Schubart;Lutz H. Gade;Ian J. Scowen

  • Metal-ion recognition. 2. Structural dislocation behavior in the interaction of zinc(II) and cadmium(II) with a series of O2N3-donor macrocycles

    Kenneth R. Adam;Keith P. Dancey;Anthony J. Leong;Leonard F. Lindoy

  • The tetrameric macrocycle [{P(μ-NtBu)}2NH]4

    Alan Bashall;Emma L. Doyle;Catherine Tubb;Sara J. Kidd

  • Templating and Selection in the Formation of Macrocycles Containing [{P(μ‐NtBu)2}(μ‐NH)]n Frameworks: Observation of Halide Ion Coordination

    Alan Bashall;Andrew D. Bond;Emma L. Doyle;Felipe García

  • New oxotechnetium(V) complexes of N,N'-ethylenebis(acetylacetone imine), N,N'-ethylenebis(salicylideneamine), and o-phenylenebis(salicylideneamine). X-ray structures of the complexes of N,N'-ethylenebis(acetylacetone imine) and N,N'-ethylenebis(salicylideneamine)

    Silvia Jurisson;Leonard F. Lindoy;Keith P. Dancey;Mary McPartlin

  • Low-temperature synthesis of zintl compounds with a single-source molecular precursor

    Michael A. Beswick;Nick Choi;Christopher N. Harmer;Alexander D. Hopkins

  • Mixed alkylamido aluminate as a kinetically controlled base.

    Hiroshi Naka;James V. Morey;Joanna Haywood;Dana J. Eisler

  • C−C and C−N Coupling Reactions of an Imidotitanium Complex with Isocyanides

    Allan Bashall;Philip E. Collier;Lutz H. Gade;Mary McPartlin

  • Structure-Function Relationships in the Interaction of Zinc(II) and Cadmium(II) with an Extended Range of 16- to 19-Membered Macrocycles Incorporating Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Sulfur Donor Atoms

    Kenneth R. Adam;Shatira P. H. Arshad;Darren S. Baldwin;Paul A. Duckworth

  • Carbide forming and cluster build-up reactions in ruthenium carbonyl cluster chemistry

    Philip J. Bailey;M.J. Duer;Brian F.G. Johnson;Jack Lewis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack Lewis
Jack Lewis University of Cambridge
Brian F. G. Johnson
Brian F. G. Johnson University of Cambridge
Dominic S. Wright
Dominic S. Wright University of Cambridge
Lutz H. Gade
Lutz H. Gade Heidelberg University
Peter A. Tasker
Peter A. Tasker University of Edinburgh
Leonard F. Lindoy
Leonard F. Lindoy University of Sydney
Paul R. Raithby
Paul R. Raithby University of Bath
Gráinne Conole
Gráinne Conole University of Leicester
Dario Braga
Dario Braga University of Bologna
Jason S. Lewis
Jason S. Lewis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to various specialized career paths that often require targeted education and training. For example, those interested in pharmaceutical applications might consider how long does it take to become a pharmacist, which typically involves several years of study and hands-on experience beyond an initial Chemistry degree.

Alternatively, students intrigued by forensic science have multiple online degree options that align well with a Chemistry background. Exploring the best online colleges for forensic science can help prospective students find affordable programs tailored to their career goals. Forensic science careers often intersect with roles like autopsy technicians, where understanding the autopsy tech salary and job outlook is crucial for informed career planning.

For those inclined toward the psychological aspects of forensic investigations, pursuing forensic psychology master's programs online offers flexible pathways to deepen expertise while maintaining a professional workload. This specialization complements Chemistry studies by integrating scientific analysis with behavioral insights.

Overall, Chemistry graduates have diverse options for continuing education and career development. By leveraging these related online degrees, students can enhance their qualifications and position themselves for rewarding roles in healthcare, forensic science, and psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mary McPartlin

Recently Published Articles