What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Effector, Biochemistry, Cell biology, Plasma protein binding and Botany are his primary areas of study.
His study in Effector is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Short linear motif, Oomycete, Conserved sequence, Host and Fungal protein.
His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Bacterial cell structure and Biochemistry.
Mark J. Banfield combines subjects such as Receptor, Nicotiana benthamiana and HMA domain with his study of Cell biology.
His work carried out in the field of Plasma protein binding brings together such families of science as Protein structure, Peptide sequence and Protein folding.
His research integrates issues of Genetics and Phytophthora infestans in his study of Botany.
His most cited work include:
- A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1 (340 citations)
- Protein-folding location can regulate manganese-binding versus copper- or zinc-binding (231 citations)
- Oomycetes, effectors, and all that jazz (192 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Effector, Cell biology, Biochemistry, Pathogen and Receptor.
His Effector research includes elements of Genetics, Immune receptor, Host, Immune system and Computational biology.
In his work, Binding site is strongly intertwined with Protein structure, which is a subfield of Computational biology.
His research in Cell biology is mostly focused on Plasma protein binding.
His work on Phosphorylation, Thioester and Active site as part of general Biochemistry study is frequently connected to Streptococcus pyogenes, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His work deals with themes such as Plant disease resistance and Intracellular, which intersect with Receptor.
He most often published in these fields:
- Effector (44.90%)
- Cell biology (29.93%)
- Biochemistry (27.89%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Effector (44.90%)
- Immune system (14.29%)
- Receptor (15.65%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Mark J. Banfield focuses on Effector, Immune system, Receptor, Cell biology and Immune receptor.
His Effector study combines topics in areas such as Plant disease resistance, HMA domain, Genetics, Pathogen and Computational biology.
His research investigates the connection between Computational biology and topics such as Protein structure that intersect with issues in Structural biology.
Mark J. Banfield studied Immune system and Function that intersect with Protein domain, Arabidopsis, Signal transduction and Innate immune system.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Gene silencing and Escherichia coli.
His research investigates the link between Immune receptor and topics such as Protein engineering that cross with problems in Mutation.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The Plant "Resistosome": Structural Insights into Immune Signaling. (29 citations)
- Protein engineering expands the effector recognition profile of a rice NLR immune receptor. (27 citations)
- Structural and biochemical studies of an NB-ARC domain from a plant NLR immune receptor (19 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary scientific interests are in Effector, Computational biology, Immune receptor, Immune system and Receptor.
His Effector study incorporates themes from Gene duplication, Genetics, Gene and Allele.
His Computational biology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Protein domain, Arabidopsis, Function, Signal transduction and Innate immune system.
His Immune system study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Plant Immunity and Plant defense against herbivory.
His research in Receptor intersects with topics in Mutation, Structural biology, Protein engineering and Protein structure.
Mark J. Banfield integrates Sf9 and Cell biology in his research.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
