World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
31
Citations
5396
World Ranking
9568
National Ranking
709

M.A. Sambrook publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.A. Sambrook sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 46 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

M.A. Sambrook D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.A. Sambrook sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

M.A. Sambrook is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily revolves around the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus also on Neuroscience.

Their research contributions span several specific areas within these fields, including:

  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Sambrook has published work primarily in molecular biology and cellular and molecular neuroscience subfields. These areas underline a scientific focus on understanding molecular and cellular processes driving physiological responses and signaling mechanisms.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled "NaloxoDARTs: Development and Characterization of Tethered Antagonists for Blockade of Mu Opioid Receptors in Discrete Neuronal Populations", published in 2025 in the SSRN Electronic Journal.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Julie Sanchez
  • Alessandro Bonifazi
  • Sam Groom
  • Gisela Camacho Hernandez
  • Eloise J. Kuijer

Sambrook's contributions appear primarily in the SSRN Electronic Journal, indicating a focus on disseminating research through this platform.

Best Publications

  • Lesion of the subthalamic nucleus for the alleviation of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced parkinsonism in the primate.

    T. Z. Aziz;D. Peggs;M. A. Sambrook;A. R. Crossman

  • Neural mechanisms underlying parkinsonian symptoms based upon regional uptake of 2-deoxyglucose in monkeys exposed to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine.

    I.J. Mitchell;C.E. Clarke;S. Boyce;R.G. Robertson

  • Experimental hemichorea/ hemiballismus in the monkey: Studies on the intracerebral site of action in a drug-induced dyskinesia

    A. R. Crossman;M. A. Sambrook;A. Jackson

  • Alleviation of parkinsonism by antagonism of excitatory amino acid transmission in the medial segment of the globus pallidus in rat and primate.

    Jonathan M. Brotchie;Ian J. Mitchell;Michael A. Sambrook;Alan R. Crossman

  • Chorea and myoclonus in the monkey induced by gamma-aminobutyric acid antagonism in the lentiform complex: the site of drug action and a hypothesis for the neural mechanisms of chorea

    A R Crossman;I J Mitchell;M A Sambrook;Alan Jackson

  • Sites of the neurotoxic action of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine in the macaque monkey include the ventral tegmental area and the locus coeruleus

    I.J. Mitchell;A.J. Cross;M.A. Sambrook;A.R. Crossman

  • A 2-deoxyglucose study of the effects of dopamine agonists on the parkinsonian primate brain. Implications for the neural mechanisms that mediate dopamine agonist-induced dyskinesia.

    I. J. Mitchell;S. Boyce;M. A. Sambrook;A. R. Crossman

  • Injection of excitatory amino acid antagonists into the medial pallidal segment of a 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) treated primate reverses motor symptoms of parkinsonism

    W.C. Graham;R.G. Robertson;M.A. Sambrook;A.R. Crossman

  • Regional brain uptake of 2-deoxyglucose in N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced parkinsonism in the macaque monkey.

    A.R. Crossman;I.J. Mitchell;M.A. Sambrook

  • Subthalamic nucleotomy alleviates parkinsonism in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-exposed primate

    Tipu Z. Aziz;David Peggs;Elisabeth Agarwal;Michael A. Sambrook

  • Levodopa-induced dyskinesia and response fluctuations in primates rendered parkinsonian with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)☆

    C.E. Clarke;M.A. Sambrook;I.J. Mitchell;A.R. Crossman

  • Neural mechanisms of dystonia: Evidence from a 2-deoxyglucose uptake study in a primate model of dopamine agonist-induced dystonia

    I. J. Mitchell;R. Luquin;S. Boyce;C. E. Clarke

  • The role of the subthalamic nucleus in experimental chorea. Evidence from 2-deoxyglucose metabolic mapping and horseradish peroxidase tracing studies.

    I J Mitchell;Alan Jackson;M A Sambrook;A R Crossman

  • MPTP-induced parkinsonism in the monkey: neurochemical pathology, complications of treatment and pathophysiological mechanisms.

    A.R. Crossman;C.E. Clarke;S. Boyce;R.G. Robertson

  • Differential effect of chronic dopaminergic treatment on dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the monkey brain in MPTP-induced parkinsonism.

    W.C. Graham;M.A. Sambrook;A.R. Crossman

  • Autoradiographic studies in animal models of hemi-parkinsonism reveal dopamine D2 but not D1 receptor supersensitivity. II. Unilateral intra-carotid infusion of MPTP in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis).

    W.C. Graham;C.E. Clarke;S. Boyce;M.A. Sambrook

  • SUBCORTICAL CHANGES IN THE REGIONAL UPTAKE OF [3H]-2-DEOXYGLUCOSE IN THE BRAIN OF THE MONKEY DURING EXPERIMENTAL CHOREIFORM DYSKINESIA ELICITED BY INJECTION OF A GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID ANTAGONIST INTO THE SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS

    I. J. Mitchell;M. A. Sambrook;A. R. Crossman

  • Dyskinesia in the primate following injection of an excitatory amino acid antagonist into the medial segment of the globus pallidus

    R.G. Robertson;S.M. Farmery;M.A. Sambrook;A.R. Crossman

  • Effect of the NMDA antagonist MK-801 on MPTP-induced parkinsonism in the monkey.

    A.R. Crossman;D. Peggs;S. Boyce;M.R. Luquin

  • The role of striatopallidal neurones utilizing gamma-aminobutyric acid in the pathophysiology of MPTP-induced parkinsonism in the primate: evidence from [3H]flunitrazepam autoradiography

    R.G. Robertson;C.A. Clarke;S. Boyce;M.A. Sambrook

  • Experimental torticollis in the monkey produced by unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine brain lesions

    A.R. Crossman;M.A. Sambrook

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan R. Crossman
Alan R. Crossman University of Manchester
Alan Jackson
Alan Jackson Arizona State University
Tipu Z. Aziz
Tipu Z. Aziz University of Oxford
Jonathan M. Brotchie
Jonathan M. Brotchie University Health Network
Robert H. Perry
Robert H. Perry Newcastle University
Paul D. Griffiths
Paul D. Griffiths University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to diverse careers in mental health, counseling, research, and therapy. Many students interested in the workings of the brain also consider graduate programs that nurture clinical, therapeutic, or research expertise online.

For those drawn to counseling or mental health support roles, there are several cacrep-accredited programs online that set the gold standard for quality in counseling education. These programs ensure your training aligns with national licensure requirements and current best practices.

If you’re seeking flexibility, online masters counseling programs offer convenient pathways for working professionals or those with busy schedules. Specialized tracks, such as marriage and family therapy, can be pursued through an lmft degree online, preparing graduates for impactful clinical roles.

Beyond clinical practice, neuroscience and psychology are closely linked. If you’re looking to expand your expertise in human behavior and cognitive processes, consider an affordable online masters in psychology. These educational options broaden your career prospects and provide essential skills for a future in behavioral science, therapy, or academia.

Best Scientists Citing M.A. Sambrook

Recently Published Articles