World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
103220
World Ranking
14615
National Ranking
818

Kenneth S. W. Sing publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth S. W. Sing sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 173 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Kenneth S. W. Sing D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth S. W. Sing sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth S. W. Sing was affiliated with Brunel University London in the United Kingdom. The academic profile and body of work indicate a career dedicated to research activities, although specific publications or detailed areas of study are not available in this record.

Due to the absence of detailed data on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications, the scope of their scholarly output and collaboration network remains unspecified.

The lack of recorded main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work limits a precise categorization of their research focus or specialization.

No awards or honors have been documented for this individual, and there is no information regarding specific recognitions or distinctions received during their career.

The scientist is confirmed to be deceased, and all references to their career and contributions reflect past tense.

Best Publications

  • Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984)

    Kenneth S. W. Sing

  • Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report)

    Matthias Thommes;Katsumi Kaneko;Alexander V. Neimark;James P. Olivier

  • Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity

    S. J. Gregg;K. S. W. Sing;H. W. Salzberg

  • Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (Technical Report)

    J. Rouquerol;D. Avnir;C. W. Fairbridge;D. H. Everett

  • Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Provisional)

    K. S. W. Sing

  • Surface Area and Porosity

    Alexander V. Neimark;Kenneth S. W. Sing;Matthias Thommes

  • Physisorption Hysteresis Loops and the Characterization of Nanoporous Materials

    Kenneth S.W. Sing;Ruth T. Williams

  • Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems

    Kenneth S. W. Sing;Douglas H. Everett;R. A. W. Haul;L. Moscou

  • The use of nitrogen adsorption for the characterisation of porous materials

    Kenneth Sing

  • Handbook of porous solids

    Ferdi Schüth;K. S. W. Sing;J. Weitkamp

  • Adsorption, surface area, and porosity

    Sidney John Gregg;Kenneth Stafford William Sing

  • Adsorption methods for the characterization of porous materials

    Kenneth S.W Sing

  • Physisorption of argon, nitrogen and oxygen by MCM-41, a model mesoporous adsorbent

    Peter J. Branton;Peter G. Hall;Kenneth S. W. Sing;Horst Reichert

  • Physisorption of nitrogen and oxygen by MCM-41, a model mesoporous adsorbent

    Peter J. Branton;Peter G. Hall;Kenneth S. W. Sing

  • Analysis of nitrogen adsorption isotherms on porous and nonporous silicas by the BET and αs methods

    M.R Bhambhani;P.A Cutting;K.S.W Sing;D.H Turk

  • Liquid intrusion and alternative methods for the characterization of macroporous materials (IUPAC Technical Report)

    Jean Rouquerol;Gino Baron;Renaud Denoyel;Herbert Giesche

  • The use of gas adsorption for the characterization of porous solids

    Kenneth S.W. Sing

  • Adsorption of nitrogen by porous and non-porous carbons

    P.J.M. Carrott;R.A. Roberts;K.S.W. Sing

  • Physisorption of nitrogen by porous materials

    Kenneth S. W. Sing

  • The Use of Molecular Probes for the Characterization of Nanoporous Adsorbents

    Kenneth S. W. Sing;Ruth T. Williams

  • The use of physisorption for the characterization of microporous carbons

    Kenneth S.W. Sing

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J.M. Carrott
Peter J.M. Carrott University of Évora
Klaus K. Unger
Klaus K. Unger Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Alexander V. Neimark
Alexander V. Neimark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Matthias Thommes
Matthias Thommes University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Philip L. Llewellyn
Philip L. Llewellyn Aix-Marseille University
Ferdi Schüth
Ferdi Schüth Max Planck Society
Katsumi Kaneko
Katsumi Kaneko Shinshu University
Renaud Denoyel
Renaud Denoyel Aix-Marseille University
David Nicholson
David Nicholson University of Queensland
Francisco Rodríguez-Reinoso
Francisco Rodríguez-Reinoso University of Alicante

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Chemistry in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Fields like forensic science heavily rely on chemical knowledge to analyze evidence, making forensic careers a natural extension. This interdisciplinary approach often enhances employability by combining science with investigative skills.

Understanding the financial commitments is crucial when considering online education. Reviewing the criminal justice degree price helps prospective students plan their investments wisely. Many quality programs offer competitive tuition, balancing cost and course flexibility.

Those interested in starting quickly might explore the best online associate degree programs in criminal justice, which provide foundational knowledge and potential entry points into careers such as crime scene analysis or legal support roles.

Alongside, paralegal roles demonstrate strong salary prospects, as detailed in paralegal salary insights. Combining a chemistry background with paralegal expertise can position graduates uniquely in legal cases involving scientific evidence.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth S. W. Sing

Recently Published Articles