World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
14675
World Ranking
10734
National Ranking
4661

John M. Burke publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Burke sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 136 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John M. Burke D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Burke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Burke is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States, with a research focus spanning medicine and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work encompasses multiple subfields including plant science, genetics, pathology and forensic medicine, oncology, and molecular biology.

The scientist's publications cover a range of topics, with significant contributions related to lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, sunflower and safflower cultivation, CAR-T cell therapy research, chronic lymphocytic leukemia research, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, genetics and plant breeding, and plant water relations and carbon dynamics.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John M. Burke include:

  • Lisa A. Donovan
  • Andries A. Temme
  • Matthew J. Matasar
  • Rishi R. Masalia
  • Jeff P. Sharman

Common publication venues associated with their research are:

  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Blood
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • PLoS ONE

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by John M. Burke include:

  • Massive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers, 2020, Nature
  • The genomics of linkage drag in inbred lines of sunflower, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Key Traits and Genes Associate with Salinity Tolerance Independent from Vigor in Cultivated Sunflower, 2020, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
  • Expression complementation of gene presence/absence polymorphisms in hybrids contributes importantly to heterosis in sunflower, 2022, Journal of Advanced Research
  • Phylogeography and the Evolutionary History of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): Wild Diversity and the Dynamics of Domestication, 2020, Genes

Best Publications

  • The sunflower genome provides insights into oil metabolism, flowering and Asterid evolution

    Hélène Badouin;Jérôme Gouzy;Christopher J. Grassa;Christopher J. Grassa;Florent Murat

  • Genetics and the fitness of hybrids.

    John M. Burke;Michael L. Arnold

  • EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses.

    J R Ellis;J M Burke

  • Agriculture: Feeding the future

    Susan McCouch;Gregory J. Baute;James Bradeen;Paula Bramel

  • Widespread natural variation of DNA methylation within angiosperms.

    Chad E. Niederhuth;Adam J. Bewick;Lexiang Ji;Magdy S. Alabady

  • Massive haplotypes underlie ecotypic differentiation in sunflowers

    Marco Todesco;Gregory L. Owens;Gregory L. Owens;Natalia Bercovich;Jean-Sébastien Légaré

  • The genetic architecture necessary for transgressive segregation is common in both natural and domesticated populations

    Loren H Rieseberg;Alex Widmer;A Michele Arntz;John M Burke

  • Genetic analysis of sunflower domestication.

    John M. Burke;Shunxue Tang;Steven J. Knapp;Loren H. Rieseberg

  • Genomic islands of divergence are not affected by geography of speciation in sunflowers

    S. Renaut;C. J. Grassa;S. Yeaman;B. T. Moyers

  • NATURAL HYBRIDIZATION: HOW LOW CAN YOU GO AND STILL BE IMPORTANT?

    Michael L. Arnold;Mark R. Bulger;John M. Burke;Alice L. Hempel

  • Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification.

    Loren H. Rieseberg;Alex Widmer;A. Michele Arntz;John M. Burke

  • EST Databases as a Source for Molecular Markers: Lessons from Helianthus

    Catherine H Pashley;Jennifer R Ellis;David E McCauley;John M Burke

  • Parallel genotypic adaptation: when evolution repeats itself

    Troy E. Wood;John M. Burke;Loren H. Rieseberg

  • Patterns of nucleotide diversity in wild and cultivated sunflower.

    Aizhong Liu;John M Burke

  • Letting the gene out of the bottle: the population genetics of genetically modified crops

    Mark A. Chapman;John M. Burke

  • A target enrichment method for gathering phylogenetic information from hundreds of loci: An example from the Compositae

    Jennifer R. Mandel;Rebecca B. Dikow;Vicki Ann Funk;Rishi R. Masalia

  • The biological reality of species: gene flow, selection, and collective evolution

    Loren H. Rieseberg;John M. Burke

  • Stability of hairpin ribozyme tertiary structure is governed by the interdomain junction

    Nils G. Walter;John M. Burke;David P. Millar

  • Extensive chromosomal repatterning and the evolution of sterility barriers in hybrid sunflower species.

    Zhao Lai;Takuya Nakazato;Marzia Salmaso;John M. Burke

  • Tertiary structure formation in the hairpin ribozyme monitored by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

    Nils G. Walter;Ken J. Hampel;Kirk M. Brown;John M. Burke

Frequent Co-Authors

Loren H. Rieseberg
Loren H. Rieseberg University of British Columbia
Steven J. Knapp
Steven J. Knapp University of California, Davis
John E. Bowers
John E. Bowers University of Georgia
Nolan C. Kane
Nolan C. Kane University of Colorado Boulder
Michael L. Arnold
Michael L. Arnold University of Georgia
Lisa A. Donovan
Lisa A. Donovan University of Georgia
Richard W. Michelmore
Richard W. Michelmore University of California, Davis
Scott A. Jackson
Scott A. Jackson University of Georgia
Michael S. Barker
Michael S. Barker University of Arizona
Joshua A. Udall
Joshua A. Udall Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John M. Burke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles