World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
70
Citations
24273
World Ranking
2244
National Ranking
1010

Jane M. Carlton publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M. Carlton sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 142 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Jane M. Carlton D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M. Carlton sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jane M. Carlton is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the field of Medicine, with a specialized focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Additional areas of study include Molecular Biology, Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Agronomy and Crop Science.

The main topics covered in their research work comprise:

  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Vibrio bacteria research studies
  • Travel-related health issues

Jane M. Carlton has published extensively, with notable publication venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Malaria Journal
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  • Trends in Parasitology
  • Scientific Reports

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Clinical and epidemiological characterization of severe Plasmodium vivax malaria in Gujarat, India (2020), published in Virulence
  • A Systematic Review of the Evidence on the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Mass Screen-and-Treat Interventions for Malaria Control (2021), published in American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  • Household and individual level risk factors associated with declining malaria incidence in Meghalaya, India: implications for malaria elimination in low-endemic settings (2021), published in Malaria Journal
  • Persistent Trichomonas vaginalis infections and the pseudocyst form (2023), published in Trends in Parasitology
  • Malaria in Sundargarh district, Odisha, India: Epidemiological and behavioral aspects from surveys (2020), published in Acta Tropica

Frequently collaborating co-authors with Jane M. Carlton include:

  • Steven A. Sullivan
  • Anne Kessler
  • Sandra Albert
  • Anna Maria van Eijk
  • Sanjib Mohanty

Jane M. Carlton was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum

    Malcolm J. Gardner;Neil Hall;Eula Fung;Owen White

  • Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison.

    Arthur L. Delcher;Adam Phillippy;Jane Carlton;Steven L. Salzberg

  • Draft genome sequence of the sexually transmitted pathogen Trichomonas vaginalis

    Jane M. Carlton;Robert . Hirt;Joana C. Silva;Arthur L. Delcher

  • Comparative genomics of trypanosomatid parasitic protozoa.

    Najib M. El-Sayed;Peter J. Myler;Peter J. Myler;Gaëlle Blandin;Matthew Berriman

  • A Comprehensive Survey of the Plasmodium Life Cycle by Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Proteomic Analyses

    Neil Hall;Marianna Karras;J. Dale Raine;Jane M. Carlton;Jane M. Carlton;Jane M. Carlton

  • Comparative genomics of the neglected human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax

    Jane M. Carlton;Jane M. Carlton;John H. Adams;Joana C. Silva;Shelby L. Bidwell

  • Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the model rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii yoelii

    Jane M. Carlton;Samuel V. Angiuoli;Bernard B. Suh;Taco W. Kooij

  • Macronuclear Genome Sequence of the Ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a Model Eukaryote

    Jonathan A. Eisen;Robert S Coyne;Martin Wu;Dongying Wu

  • Genome sequence of Silicibacter pomeroyi reveals adaptations to the marine environment

    Mary Ann Moran;Alison Buchan;José M. González;John F. Heidelberg

  • Lineage-specific expansion of proteins exported to erythrocytes in malaria parasites

    Tobias J Sargeant;Tobias J Sargeant;Matthias Marti;Elisabet Caler;Jane M Carlton

  • Genome sequence of Theileria parva, a bovine pathogen that transforms lymphocytes.

    Malcolm J. Gardner;Richard Bishop;Trushar Shah;Etienne P. de Villiers

  • The complexities of malaria disease manifestations with a focus on asymptomatic malaria.

    Dolie D Laishram;Dolie D Laishram;Patrick L. Sutton;Nutan Nanda;Vijay L Sharma

  • Relapses of Plasmodium vivax Infection Usually Result from Activation of Heterologous Hypnozoites

    Mallika Imwong;Georges Snounou;Sasithon Pukrittayakamee;Naowarat Tanomsing

  • Geospatial Resolution of Human and Bacterial Diversity with City-Scale Metagenomics

    Ebrahim Afshinnekoo;Ebrahim Afshinnekoo;Cem Meydan;Shanin Chowdhury;Shanin Chowdhury;Dyala Jaroudi

  • The Plasmodium falciparum translationally controlled tumor protein homolog and its reaction with the antimalarial drug artemisinin.

    Jamaree Bhisutthibhan;Xing-Qing Pan;Paul A. Hossler;Daniel J. Walker

  • The malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax exhibits greater genetic diversity than Plasmodium falciparum

    Daniel E Neafsey;Kevin Galinsky;Rays H Y Jiang;Lauren Young

  • The transcriptome of Plasmodium vivax reveals divergence and diversity of transcriptional regulation in malaria parasites

    Zbynek Bozdech;Sachel Mok;Guangan Hu;Mallika Imwong

  • Host Switch Leads to Emergence of Plasmodium vivax Malaria in Humans

    Jianbing Mu;Deirdre A. Joy;Junhui Duan;Yaming Huang

  • Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and

    L. Delcher;Adam Phillippy;Jane Carlton;Steven L. Salzberg

  • Relapses of Plasmodium vivax infection usually result from activation of heterologous hypnozoites. Commentary

    William E. Collins;Mallika Imwong;Georges Snounou;Sasithon Pukrittayakamee

Frequent Co-Authors

John W. Barnwell
John W. Barnwell Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Steven L. Salzberg
Steven L. Salzberg Johns Hopkins University
Xin-zhuan Su
Xin-zhuan Su National Institutes of Health
John B. Dame
John B. Dame University of Florida
David Walliker
David Walliker University of Edinburgh
Daniel J. Carucci
Daniel J. Carucci Naval Medical Research Center
Neil Hall
Neil Hall Norwich Research Park
Joseph M. Vinetz
Joseph M. Vinetz Yale University
Claire M. Fraser
Claire M. Fraser University of Maryland, Baltimore
Robert P. Hirt
Robert P. Hirt Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options can open many doors for students interested in Genetics and related healthcare fields. For example, those looking to enter healthcare administration can consider accredited medical billing and coding schools online, which provide flexible programs and financial aid.

Many learners prefer accelerated study options. By enrolling in colleges with accelerated programs, you can potentially earn your degree faster and start your career sooner.

Flexibility is important for today’s students. A self paced accredited online college allows you to set your own timetable, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Cost is another key factor. Choosing online universities with no application fee can help minimize upfront expenses while pursuing your Genetics or healthcare studies.

No matter your preferred pathway, online education provides numerous options for launching or advancing a career in the growing field of Genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Jane M. Carlton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles