World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 58 10470 2892 377 15725

James E. Boggs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James E. Boggs between 1955 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James E. Boggs published across 60 years, from 1955 to 2014, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 1988. 6 of the 382 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 1988. 1955: 3 publications 1956: 1 publication 1957: 6 publications 1958: 3 publications 1959: 5 publications 1960: 3 publications 1961: 1 publication 1962: 3 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 5 publications 1965: 6 publications 1966: 4 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 5 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 5 publications 1972: 8 publications 1973: 12 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 11 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 9 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 11 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 13 publications 1986: 14 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 23 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication
1955 2014

382 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James E. Boggs: publications per year, 1955 to 2014
Year Publications
1955 3
1956 1
1957 6
1958 3
1959 5
1960 3
1961 1
1962 3
1963 1
1964 5
1965 6
1966 4
1967 4
1968 5
1969 2
1970 2
1971 5
1972 8
1973 12
1974 3
1975 4
1976 8
1977 7
1978 5
1979 11
1980 8
1981 9
1982 9
1983 11
1984 13
1985 13
1986 14
1987 4
1988 23
1989 8
1990 8
1991 6
1992 7
1993 10
1994 5
1995 10
1996 3
1997 3
1998 7
1999 8
2000 11
2001 7
2002 5
2003 5
2004 4
2005 11
2006 6
2007 5
2008 6
2009 4
2010 9
2011 5
2012 2
2013 5
2014 1
Total 382
Download as CSV

James E. Boggs publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Boggs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 377 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522 377
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

James E. Boggs D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Boggs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930 58
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James E. Boggs is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research within this institution, although specific details regarding fields of study, subfields, or research topics have not been documented in the data provided.

Available sources do not list any recent papers authored by James E. Boggs, nor are there records of frequent co-authors or predominant publication venues connected to their work. Similarly, information about book publications or awards has not been included.

Due to limited data on their research output, it is not possible to detail specific areas of expertise or contributions to particular scientific topics or fields. The absence of this information indicates either a focus outside the conventional academic record or a need for further data collection to better understand their scholarly activities.

Best Publications

  • SYSTEMATIC AB INITIO GRADIENT CALCULATION OF MOLECULAR GEOMETRIES, FORCE CONSTANTS, AND DIPOLE MOMENT DERIVATIVES

    P. Pulay;G. Fogarasi;F. Pang;J. E. Boggs

  • Combination of theoretical ab initio and experimental information to obtain reliable harmonic force constants. Scaled quantum mechanical (QM) force fields for glyoxal, acrolein, butadiene, formaldehyde, and ethylene

    Peter Pulay;Geza Fogarasi;Gabor Pongor;James E. Boggs

  • FORCE FIELD, DIPOLE MOMENT DERIVATIVES, AND VIBRONIC CONSTANTS OF BENZENE FROM A COMBINATION OF EXPERIMENTAL AND AB INITIO QUANTUM CHEMICAL INFORMATION

    P. Pulay;G. Fogarasi;J. E. Boggs

  • IUPAC Critical Evaluation of Thermochemical Properties of Selected Radicals. Part I

    Branko Ruscic;James E. Boggs;Alexander Burcat;Attila G. Császár

  • Cubic force constants and equilibrium geometry of methane from Hartree–Fock and correlated wavefunctions

    Péter Pulay;Wilfried Meyer;James E. Boggs

  • Collision Broadening of Rotational Absorption Lines. I. Theoretical Formulation

    Joseph S. Murphy;James E. Boggs

  • Theoretical prediction of vibrational spectra. 2. Force field, spectroscopically refined geometry, and reassignment of the vibrational spectrum of naphthalene

    Harrell Sellers;Peter Pulay;James E. Boggs

  • Theoretical Prediction of Vibrational Spectra. 1. The In-Plane Force Field and Vibrational Spectra of Pyridine

    Gabor Pongor;Peter Pulay;Geza Fogarasi;James E. Boggs

  • Importance of (p-d).pi. bonding in the siloxane bond

    Heinz Oberhammer;James E. Boggs

  • CH bond length variations due to the intramolecular environment: a comparison of the results obtained by the method of isolated CH stretching frequencies and by ab initio gradient calculations

    Donald C. McKean;James E. Boggs;Lothar Schäfer

  • A systematic study of the convergence and additivity of correlation and basis set effects on the force constants of small molecules: HF, HCN, and NH3

    Péter Pulay;Jung‐Goo Lee;James E. Boggs

  • GEOMETRIC STRUCTURE AND PSEUDOROTATIONAL POTENTIAL OF PYRROLIDINE. AN AB INITIO AND ELECTRON DIFFRACTION STUDY

    G. Pfafferott;H. Oberhammer;J. E. Boggs;W. Caminati

  • Theoretical prediction of vibrational spectra

    Zefu Niu;Kevin M. Dunn;James E. Boggs

  • On the Covalent Character of Rare Gas Bonding Interactions: A New Kind of Weak Interaction

    Wenli Zou;Davood Nori-Shargh;Davood Nori-Shargh;James E. Boggs

  • Contributions of resonance, hybridization, and nonbonded interactions to the structure of butadiene

    S. Skaarup;J.E. Boggs;P.N. Skancke

  • Effect of collision‐induced phase shifts on the linewidths and line shifts of rotational spectral lines

    Suresh C. Mehrotra;James E. Boggs

  • Vibrational energy levels of hydrogen cyanide

    Kevin M. Dunn;James E. Boggs;Peter Pulay

  • Ab inttio structural analysis of some saturated 3- and 4-membered rings

    P.N. Skancke;Geza Fogarasi;James E. Boggs

  • Ab initio calculation of amine out-of-plane angles

    James E. Boggs;Zefu Niu

  • Collision Broadening of Rotational Absorption Lines. III. Broadening by Linear Molecules and Inert Gases and the Determination of Molecular Quadrupole Moments

    Joseph S. Murphy;James E. Boggs

  • Equilibrium Molecular Structures : From Spectroscopy to Quantum Chemistry

    Jean Demaison;James E. Boggs;Attila G. Csaszar

Frequent Co-Authors

Claus J. Nielsen
Claus J. Nielsen University of Oslo
Peter Pulay
Peter Pulay University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Alan H. Cowley
Alan H. Cowley The University of Texas at Austin
John F. Stanton
John F. Stanton University of Florida
Attila G. Császár
Attila G. Császár Eötvös Loránd University
Konrad Seppelt
Konrad Seppelt Freie Universität Berlin
Hans Bock
Hans Bock Goethe University Frankfurt
Kenneth Hedberg
Kenneth Hedberg Oregon State University
Arndt Simon
Arndt Simon Max Planck Society
Helge Willner
Helge Willner University of Wuppertal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, many of which can be enhanced with complementary online degrees. For example, those interested in applying chemical knowledge to legal or investigative work might explore high paying jobs in forensics. Combining chemistry skills with forensic science can lead to rewarding roles in crime labs and law enforcement agencies.

Additionally, pursuing a degree in criminal justice can complement a chemistry background, especially for roles that require understanding of legal processes. If you’re curious about costs, it’s helpful to review information on how much is criminal justice degree, helping you plan your education budget effectively.

For those needing flexibility, many students choose a 2 year criminal justice degree online, which offers a practical pathway to enter related fields quickly without sacrificing quality.

Lastly, complementary certifications such as a paralegal certificate can expand career choices, blending legal expertise with scientific knowledge for unique interdisciplinary roles. Exploring these options broadens the career scope beyond traditional chemistry jobs.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Boggs

Recently Published Articles