World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hüseyin Budak

Hüseyin Budak

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
4209
World Ranking
3199
National Ranking
21

Hüseyin Budak publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hüseyin Budak sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 440 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Hüseyin Budak D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hüseyin Budak sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Generalized Ostrowski type inequalities for local fractional integrals

    Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya;Hüseyin Budak

  • Fractional Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for interval-valued functions

    Hüseyin Budak;Tuba Tunç;Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya

  • Some New Quantum Hermite–Hadamard-Like Inequalities for Coordinated Convex Functions

    Hüseyin Budak;Muhammad Aamir Ali;Meliha Tarhanaci

  • Simpson and Newton type inequalities for convex functions via newly defined quantum integrals

    Hüseyin Budak;Samet Erden;Muhammad Aamir Ali

  • New quantum boundaries for quantum Simpson’s and quantum Newton’s type inequalities for preinvex functions

    Muhammad Aamir Ali;Mujahid Abbas;Hüseyin Budak;Praveen Agarwal

  • Some new Simpson's type inequalities for coordinated convex functions in quantum calculus

    Muhammad Aamir Ali;Hüseyin Budak;Zhiyue Zhang;Hüseyin Yildirim

  • New version of fractional Simpson type inequalities for twice differentiable functions

    Fatih Hezenci;Hüseyin Budak;Hasan Kara

  • Quantum Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for functions with convex absolute values of second q b $q^{b}$ -derivatives

    Muhammad Aamir Ali;Hüseyin Budak;Mujahid Abbas;Yu-Ming Chu

  • Some trapezoid and midpoint type inequalities for newly defined quantum integrals

    Hüseyin Budak

  • Riemann–Liouville Fractional Newton’s Type Inequalities for Differentiable Convex Functions

    Unknown

  • Quantum variant of Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities for the mappings of two variables

    Muhammad Aamir Ali;Yu-Ming Chu;Hüseyin Budak;Abdullah Akkurt

  • On parameterized inequalities of Ostrowski and Simpson type for convex functions via generalized fractional integrals

    Hüseyin Budak;Fatih Hezenci;Hasan Kara

  • Quantum Ostrowski-type inequalities for twice quantum differentiable functions in quantum calculus

    Muhammad Aamir Ali;Hüseyin Budak;Abdullah Akkurt;Yu-Ming Chu

  • Ostrowski and Simpson type inequalities for multiplicative integrals

    Muhammad Aamir Ali;Hüseyin Budak;Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya;Zhiyue Zhang

  • On generalized some integral inequalities for local fractional integrals

    Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya;Tuba Tunc;Hüseyin Budak

  • On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for multiplicative fractional integrals

    Unknown

  • On new Milne-type inequalities for fractional integrals

    Unknown

  • On generalized Ostrowski, Simpson and Trapezoidal type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions via generalized fractional integrals

    Hüseyin Budak;Fatih Hezenci;Hasan Kara

  • Some New Hermite-Hadamard and Related Inequalities for Convex Functions via (p,q)-Integral.

    Miguel J. Vivas-Cortez;Muhammad Aamir Ali;Hüseyin Budak;Humaira Kalsoom

  • Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for the interval-valued approximately h-convex functions via generalized fractional integrals

    Dafang Zhao;Muhammad Aamir Ali;Artion Kashuri;Hüseyin Budak

Frequent Co-Authors

Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya
Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya Duzce University
Mujahid Abbas
Mujahid Abbas University of Pretoria
Praveen Agarwal
Praveen Agarwal Anand International College of Engineering, Jaipur
Yu-Ming Chu
Yu-Ming Chu Huzhou University
Poom Kumam
Poom Kumam King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
Jessada Tariboon
Jessada Tariboon King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok
Sotiris K. Ntouyas
Sotiris K. Ntouyas University of Ioannina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Mathematics serves as a strong foundation for various career paths, especially in business and finance. Students interested in enhancing their quantitative skills can explore options like an MBA, which combines leadership training with analytical expertise. For those seeking a quicker route, accelerated mba programs online offer a streamlined study plan to enter the workforce faster.

Cost is another critical factor when selecting a degree. Many prospective learners look for affordable solutions without compromising quality. Exploring the masters in finance online programs can provide a cost-effective way to develop practical skills aligned with mathematics and financial analysis.

For those focusing on higher leadership roles or research, pursuing a Doctorate in Business Administration can be an excellent choice. There are options among the cheapest online dba programs, which make advanced education more accessible.

Additionally, students exploring less traditional paths might consider programs recognized as easiest mba programs that emphasize flexibility and support for online learners, allowing them to balance studies with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Hüseyin Budak

Recently Published Articles