World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Fatima M. Plieva

Fatima M. Plieva

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 40 17854 267 63 7178

Fatima M. Plieva publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fatima M. Plieva between 1998 and 2011, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fatima M. Plieva published across 14 years, from 1998 to 2011, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2008. 4 of the 66 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2011. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2008. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications
1998 2011

66 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fatima M. Plieva: publications per year, 1998 to 2011
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 4
2004 5
2005 7
2006 7
2007 7
2008 11
2009 10
2010 2
2011 2
Total 66
Download as CSV

Fatima M. Plieva publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fatima M. Plieva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 63 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66 63
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Fatima M. Plieva D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fatima M. Plieva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289 40
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fatima M. Plieva is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden. Their academic contributions span multiple aspects of research associated with this institution.

Although specific details regarding publications, co-authors, and primary research topics are not provided, the scholar's affiliation indicates engagement with the research environment at Lund University, a well-established academic center.

There is no available information about recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study. Similarly, details about awards or recognitions are not included in the available data.

The overall profile is based on the affiliation information, and additional insights into the researcher's work or topical focus are not accessible within the current dataset.

Best Publications

  • Polymeric cryogels as promising materials of biotechnological interest.

    Vladimir I. Lozinsky;Igor Yu. Galaev;Fatima M. Plieva;Irina N. Savina

  • The potential of polymeric cryogels in bioseparation.

    Vladimir I. Lozinsky;Fatima M. Plieva;Igor Yu. Galaev;Bo Mattiasson

  • Direct chromatographic capture of enzyme from crude homogenate using immobilized metal affinity chromatography on a continuous supermacroporous adsorbent

    Pär Arvidsson;Fatima M Plieva;Vladimir I Lozinsky;Igor Yu Galaev

  • Pore structure in supermacroporous polyacrylamide based cryogels

    Fatima M. Plieva;Malin Karlsson;Maria-Rosa Aguilar;David Gomez

  • Pore structure in supermacroporous polyacrylamide based cryogels

    Fatima M. Plieva;Malin Karlsson;Maria Rosa Aguilar;David Gomez

  • Chromatography of microbial cells using continuous supermacroporous affinity and ion-exchange columns

    Pär Arvidsson;Fatima M Plieva;Irina N Savina;Irina N Savina;Vladimir I Lozinsky

  • Macroporous gels prepared at subzero temperatures as novel materials for chromatography of particulate-containing fluids and cell culture applications

    Fatima M. Plieva;Igor Yu. Galaev;Bo Mattiasson

  • Cryogel applications in microbiology.

    Fatima M. Plieva;Igor Yu. Galaev;Wim Noppe;Bo Mattiasson

  • Characterization of supermacroporous monolithic polyacrylamide based matrices designed for chromatography of bioparticles.

    Fatima M Plieva;Irina N Savina;Irina N Savina;Sahar Deraz;Jonatan Andersson

  • Characterization of polyacrylamide based monolithic columns.

    Fatima M. Plieva;Jonatan Andersson;Igor Yu. Galaev;Bo Mattiasson

  • Affinity fractionation of lymphocytes using a monolithic cryogel.

    Ashok Kumar;Fatima M Plieva;Igor Yu Galaev;Bo Mattiasson

  • The performance of laminin-containing cryogel scaffolds in neural tissue regeneration.

    Marcin Jurga;Maria B. Dainiak;Anna Sarnowska;Anna Jablonska

  • Macroporous molecularly imprinted polymer/cryogel composite systems for the removal of endocrine disrupting trace contaminants

    Mathieu Le Noir;Fatima Plieva;Tobias Hey;Benoit Guieysse;Benoit Guieysse

  • Macroporous elastic polyacrylamide gels prepared at subzero temperatures: control of porous structure

    Fatima Plieva;Xiao Huiting;Igor Yu. Galaev;Björn Bergenståhl

  • Cell chromatography: Separation of different microbial cells using IMAC supermacroporous monolithic columns

    Maria B. Dainiak;Fatima M. Plieva;Igor Yu. Galaev;Rajni Hatti-Kaul

  • Characterization of a continuous supermacroporous monolithic matrix for chromatographic separation of large bioparticles.

    Patrik Persson;Oxana Baybak;Fatima Plieva;Igor Y. Galaev

  • Preparation of macroporous cryostructurated gel monoliths, their characterization and main applications

    Fatima M. Plieva;Harald Kirsebom;Bo Mattiasson

  • Pore structure of macroporous monolithic cryogels prepared from poly(vinyl alcohol)

    Fatima M. Plieva;Malin Karlsson;Maria Rosa Aguilar;David Gomez

  • Integrated isolation of antibody fragments from microbial cell culture fluids using supermacroporous cryogels.

    Maria B Dainiak;Ashok Kumar;Fatima M Plieva;Igor Yu Galaev

  • Monolithic macroporous albumin/chitosan cryogel structure: a new matrix for enzyme immobilization.

    Martin Hedström;Fatima Plieva;Igor Yu. Galaev;Bo Mattiasson

  • Macroporous monolithic gels, cryogels, with immobilized phages from phage-display library as a new platform for fast development of affinity adsorbent capable of target capture from crude feeds

    Wim Noppe;Fatima M. Plieva;Karen Vanhoorelbeke;Hans Deckmyn

Frequent Co-Authors

Bo Mattiasson
Bo Mattiasson Lund University
Igor Yu. Galaev
Igor Yu. Galaev DSM (Netherlands)
Vladimir I. Lozinsky
Vladimir I. Lozinsky A. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds
Ashok Kumar
Ashok Kumar Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Sergey V. Mikhalovsky
Sergey V. Mikhalovsky University of Brighton
Rajni Hatti-Kaul
Rajni Hatti-Kaul Lund University
Julio San Román
Julio San Román Spanish National Research Council
Virinder S. Parmar
Virinder S. Parmar City University of New York
Benoit Guieysse
Benoit Guieysse University of Canterbury
Erhan Pişkin
Erhan Pişkin Hacettepe University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry with a forensic focus, pursuing an online bachelor's degree in forensic science can provide a strong foundation. These programs combine chemistry principles with criminal investigation techniques, preparing graduates for specialized roles in forensic laboratories and law enforcement agencies.

Advancing your education through forensic psychology graduate programs online offers insights into the psychological aspects of criminal behavior, complementing the scientific understanding of evidence analysis. This interdisciplinary approach broadens career prospects beyond traditional chemistry paths.

Exploring forensic careers reveals a variety of opportunities that blend scientific expertise with investigative procedures. From crime scene analysis to toxicology, the field demands diverse skill sets that chemistry students can develop through targeted online education.

When considering further education, understanding how much is a criminal justice degree is essential. Tuition and fees vary widely, so prospective students should balance program costs with career goals to make informed decisions about their educational investments.

Best Scientists Citing Fatima M. Plieva

Recently Published Articles