| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetics | 114 | 21 | 24 | 7 |
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 116 | 88 | 101 | 16 |
Plant Breeding tackles a plethora of topics, such as Botany, Genetics, Agronomy, Cultivar and Poaceae. Plant Breeding tackles studies in Genetic variability and the interrelated subject of Genetic variation to gain insights into Botany. It concentrated on Genetics research, specifically Gene, Genetic marker, Locus (genetics), Quantitative trait locus and Allele.
Chromosome is a focus of the Gene works in it. Issues in Genetic marker were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Molecular marker, RAPD, Microsatellite, Restriction fragment length polymorphism and Gene mapping. Agronomy research presented in Plant Breeding encompasses a variety of subjects, including Selection (genetic algorithm) and Heritability.
The studies on Cultivar discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Plant disease resistance and Genotype. The Poaceae works, particularly on Hordeum vulgare are tackled in Plant Breeding. Plant Breeding addresses concerns in the field of Hybrid by exploring it in line with topics in Backcrossing which intersect with Introgression subjects.
The journal articles explore disciplines such as Botany, Genetics, Cultivar, Poaceae and Agronomy. In addition to Botany research, the most cited publications aim to explore topics under Genetic diversity, Ploidy and Horticulture. While the most cited papers focused on Cultivar, they were also able to explore topics like Plant disease resistance and Genotype.
The topics of Genetics, Botany, Quantitative trait locus, Resistance (ecology) and Agronomy are the focal point of discussions in the journal. The study on Genetics presented in Plant Breeding intersects with subjects under the field of Drought tolerance. It explores issues in Botany which can be linked to other research areas like Oryza sativa and Salinity.
Plant Breeding addresses concerns in Quantitative trait locus which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Glycine, Genome-wide association study, Identification (biology), Aphid and Gene mapping. The research on Resistance (ecology) tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Zea mays, Striga hermonthica, Striga, Horticulture and White (mutation). Plant Breeding focuses on Phenotype but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Germplasm and Gossypium.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Plant Breeding (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Plant Breeding (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.82% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 23.17% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 18.29% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 6.10% of all publications and 52.44% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Maria Buerstmayr;Barbara Steiner;Hermann Buerstmayr
(2020)Maliata Athon Wanga;Hussein Shimelis;Jacob Mashilo;Mark D. Laing
(2021)Uday Chand Jha;Abhishek Bohra;Harsh Nayyar
(2020)Fatemeh Ebrahim;Ahmad Arzani;Mehdi Rahimmalek;Dongfa Sun
(2020)Abdoul-Madjidou Yacoubou;Nouhoun Zoumarou Wallis;Abebe Menkir;Valerien A Zinsou
(2021)Roshan Kumar Singh;Priyanka Sood;Ashish Prasad;Manoj Prasad
(2021)Saeid Mobini;Hamid Khazaei;Thomas D. Warkentin;Albert Vandenberg
(2020)Fluturë Novakazi;Olga Afanasenko;Nina Lashina;Gregory J. Platz
(2020)David Sewordor Gaikpa;Bärbel Lieberherr;Hans Peter Maurer;C. Friedrich H. Longin
(2020)Exploring Plant Science and Agronomy opens doors to diverse career paths requiring specialized education. For many, balancing education with life and work commitments means online programs are an ideal choice. Understanding program timelines and entry requirements is key to finding the right fit.
For those interested in fast-tracking their credentials, the fastest way to become a nurse practitioner offers valuable insights into accelerated study options—a concept that parallels some quick-start agricultural courses focused on practical application.
Traditional degree pathways, like the best rn to bsn programs, highlight how bridge programs shorten completion times while enhancing expertise, an approach mirrored in agronomy certificate programs designed to build specialized skills efficiently.
Similarly, pathways such as adn to np programs demonstrate the importance of seamless transitions between credential levels. This is relevant for agronomists aiming to advance through related agricultural science degrees.
Finally, for those pivoting from unrelated fields, exploring direct entry msn programs for non nursing majors reveals options for direct entry into advanced degrees without prior background—a useful model for non-agriculture majors pursuing agronomy.
By understanding these educational models, students can better navigate online degree options tailored to their career goals in Plant Science and Agronomy.
