| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 206 | 23 | 52 | 11 |
| Ecology and Evolution | 302 | 49 | 98 | 12 |
The main research concerns discussed in PhytoKeys are Botany, Taxonomy (biology), Genus, Taxon and Ecology. Inflorescence is part of Botany studies tackled in the journal. It explores topics in Taxonomy (biology) which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Bract, Plant morphology, Clade and Gesneriaceae.
The journal explores studies in Genus as part of the wider topic of Zoology. The Taxon works featured in it incorporate elements from Subspecies, Herbarium and Nomenclature. PhytoKeys centers on topics in Nomenclature, with a focus on Typification.
Endemism, Habitat, Flora, Biodiversity and Species richness studies are all carried out as a component of the study in Ecology presented. The journal holds forums on IUCN Red List that merges themes from other disciplines such as Critically endangered and Endangered species.
The published papers focus on Botany, Taxon, Taxonomy (biology), Ecology and Zoology. The published articles address concerns in Botany which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Conservation status and Clade. The most cited articles explore topics in Taxonomy (biology) which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Biodiversity, Fabaceae, Checklist, Monophyly and Introduced species.
The scientific interests tackled in the journal are Botany, Taxonomy (biology), Genus, Taxon and Ecology. While the journal focused on Botany, it was also able to explore topics like IUCN Red List and China. IUCN Red List research featured in it incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Conservation status, Critically endangered, Petiole (botany) and Endemism.
The concepts on Taxonomy (biology) presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Tepal, Gesneriaceae and Key (lock). While Genus is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Evolutionary biology, Endangered species, Clade, Monophyly and Apiaceae. While Taxon is the key highlight in it, it also covered some subjects on Peninsula and Subspecies.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in PhytoKeys (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in PhytoKeys (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 17.70% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 43.01% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 4.30% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.83% of all publications and 40.86% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Unknown
(2022)Zhuo Cheng;Qiong Fang;Fei Wang;Chun-Lin Long
(2021)Léo-Paul M.J. Dagallier;Frank M. Mbago;W.R. Quentin Luke;Thomas L.P. Couvreur
(2021)Stefano Martellos;Fabrizio Bartolucci;Fabio Conti;Gabriele Galasso
(2020)Elizabeth A. Kellogg;J. Richard Abbott;Kamaljit S. Bawa;Kanchi N. Gandhi
(2020)Rumrada Meeboonya;Chatchai Ngernsaengsaruay;Henrik Balslev
(2021)Studying Plant Science and Agronomy in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which can be complemented by related online degree programs. For those looking to switch fields or expand their expertise, exploring accelerated education options is key.
For example, healthcare-related accelerated tracks such as accelerated bsn programs for non nurses california offer a fast-track route for non-nursing graduates interested in healthcare careers. Similarly, for professionals aiming to advance clinical roles, nurse practitioner courses provide critical training within a condensed timeframe.
Bridging programs can also facilitate career growth in health and science sectors, such as the rn to bsn in 3 months option that speeds educational advancement. Additionally, for those with an associate degree, online pathways like adn to np programs online create opportunities to achieve advanced practice roles efficiently.
While these programs focus on healthcare, their accelerated and flexible formats can serve as inspiration for similar structures in agricultural and plant sciences, highlighting the importance of adaptable learning routes to meet evolving industry demands.
