0952-3480
Published by: Wiley
https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10991492
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 887 | 149 | 220 | 25 |
NMR in Biomedicine aims to foster the development of research in Nuclear magnetic resonance, In vivo, Magnetic resonance imaging, Pathology and Internal medicine. The majority of Nuclear magnetic resonance studies in it are focused on the subject of Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In vivo research featured in it incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Metabolite, Biochemistry, Choline and Human brain.
The works on Biochemistry deal in particular with Metabolism. The in-depth study on Magnetic resonance imaging also explores topics in the intersecting field of Nuclear medicine. NMR in Biomedicine links adjacent topics like Nuclear medicine with Perfusion.
The studies on Internal medicine discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Endocrinology and Cardiology. The study on Diffusion MRI featured in the journal expounds on the topic of Fractional anisotropy in particular.
The most cited articles focus largely on the fields of Nuclear magnetic resonance, In vivo, Pathology, Magnetic resonance imaging and Diffusion MRI. In particular, the Nuclear magnetic resonance works presented in the published articles emphasize discussions on Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The most cited articles deal with In vivo in conjunction with Metabolite and similar fields in Metabolomics.
The main research concerns discussed in the journal are Nuclear magnetic resonance, In vivo, Biomedical engineering, Signal and Nuclear medicine. In NMR in Biomedicine, Imaging phantom, Voxel, Magnetic resonance imaging and Reproducibility are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Nuclear magnetic resonance research. In addition to Imaging phantom research, the journal aims to explore topics under Acoustics, Algorithm and Magnetic resonance elastography.
It facilitates discussions on Magnetic resonance imaging that incorporate concepts from other fields like Undersampling and Pattern recognition. The work on In vivo tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Endocrinology, Choline, Internal medicine and Pathology. Nuclear medicine research featured in the journal incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Diffusion MRI and Perfusion.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in NMR in Biomedicine (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in NMR in Biomedicine (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.26% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 28.94% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 15.74% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.32% of all publications and 40.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Alexander Lin;Ovidiu Andronesi;Wolfgang Bogner;In‐Young Choi
(2021)Cristina Cudalbu;Kevin L. Behar;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya;Wolfgang Bogner
(2021)Martin Krssak;Lucas Lindeboom;Vera Schrauwen-Hinderling;Lidia S. Szczepaniak
(2021)M. Ethan MacDonald;G. Bruce Pike
(2021)Andrew A. Maudsley;Ovidiu C. Andronesi;Peter B. Barker;Alberto Bizzi
(2021)In Young Choi;Ovidiu C. Andronesi;Peter Barker;Wolfgang Bogner
(2021)Roland Kreis;Vincent Boer;In Young Choi;Cristina Cudalbu
(2021)Christoph Juchem;Cristina Cudalbu;Robin A. de Graaf;Rolf Gruetter
(2021)Dinesh K. Deelchand;Adam Berrington;Adam Berrington;Ralph Noeske;James M. Joers
(2021)For those interested in the medical field but not ready to commit to a full medical degree, online nursing programs offer a flexible and affordable alternative. Exploring options like how much is online nursing school can provide valuable insight into the investment needed for quality education without overwhelming expenses.
Advanced practice nurses seeking to expand their qualifications might consider the most affordable dnp programs, which combine convenience with affordability. These programs help bridge the gap between nursing and advanced clinical roles, making them a smart career step.
Additionally, for registered nurses aiming to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, understanding the average cost of rn to bsn programs can guide financial planning and decision-making. Many of these programs offer online options that fit various schedules.
Lastly, prospective students concerned about entrance exams may find relief with schools listed under nursing school that doesn't require teas. These institutions provide pathways into nursing without standardized testing barriers, broadening access to the profession.
