| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 399 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
The journal facilitates discussions on Botany, Genus, Taxonomy (biology), Ecology and Flora. Most of the works presented in Kew Bulletin deals with Botany but it intersects with the subject of Zoology. The journal connects research in Genus with the related topic of Key (lock).
It connects the study in Taxonomy (biology) with the closely related area of Geographic distribution. The journal is mostly focused on Ecology, specifically Conservation status.
The most cited articles are organized to reinforce research efforts on Botany, Genus, Taxonomy (biology), Ecology and Zoology. The published papers explore issues in Botany which can be linked to other research areas like Key (lock) and Morphology (biology). Genus research is the primary subject tackled in the published articles with a focus in Tribe (biology).
The journal tackles a plethora of topics, such as Botany, Plant ecology, Genus, Ecology and Conservation status. The work on Botany addressed in it expands to the thematically related Key (lock). The studies on Plant ecology discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Taxon, Acanthaceae, Caryophyllaceae and Ecology (disciplines).
It explores research in Caryophyllaceae alongside concepts in Gypsophila and other areas of study in Morphology (biology) and Taxonomy (biology). The journal holds forums on Genus that merges themes from other disciplines such as Type (biology), Affinities, Poaceae and Cercidoideae. The presented research on Conservation status deals specifically with Lamiaceae but it also addresses topics in Forestry and Salvia.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Kew Bulletin (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Kew Bulletin (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 16.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 59.52% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 4.76% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.90% of all publications and 23.81% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Fabrício Moreira Ferreira;Cassiano A. Dorneles Welker;Lynn G. Clark;Reyjane P. Oliveira
(2020)G. P. Lewis
(2020)Ronaldo Vinícius-Silva;Lynn G. Clark;Jéferson Nunes Fregonezi;Ana Paula Santos-Gonçalves
(2021)For those interested in advancing their education in Plant Science and Agronomy, several online degree options offer flexibility and targeted career pathways. Similar to programs such as adn to np, students can explore degree bridges and specialized tracks that accelerate progress toward advanced expertise.
Direct entry programs, like direct entry msn programs for non nurses online, demonstrate how online education options provide accessible routes for individuals switching careers or entering related fields without prior experience.
When comparing educational providers, much like the evaluation of programs in chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program, it's important to consider factors such as curriculum quality, flexibility, and career support to ensure a good match with your professional goals in agronomy.
Additionally, specialized career opportunities like becoming a functional nurse practitioner illustrate how focused training can expand your impact, combining scientific knowledge with practical applications that benefit ecological and agricultural health.
