| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetics | 98 | 34 | 38 | 9 |
| Medicine | 1796 | 74 | 80 | 14 |
The journal facilitates discussions on Genetic counseling, Public health, Genetic testing, Family medicine and Human genetics. Journal of Genetic Counseling holds forums on Genetic counseling that merges themes from other disciplines such as Social psychology, Psychosocial, Psychiatry, Medical education and Clinical psychology. The work on Medical education presented in it focuses on Professional development in particular.
While work presented in it provided substantial information on Clinical psychology, it also covered topics in Feeling and Anxiety. Topics in Public health were tackled in line with various other fields like Qualitative research, Health care, MEDLINE and Disease. The study on Qualitative research featured in it expounds on the topic of Thematic analysis in particular.
The studies on Genetic testing discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Test (assessment), Cancer, Breast cancer, Gynecology and Family history. The research on Family medicine discussed in it draws on the closely related field of Informed consent. Human genetics study tackled is connected to the field of Medical genetics.
The journal papers explore disciplines such as Genetic counseling, Public health, Genetic testing, Clinical psychology and Human genetics. While the published papers focused on Genetic counseling, they were also able to explore topics like Social psychology, MEDLINE, Psychosocial, Family medicine and Qualitative research. The journal papers with studies in Public health featured incorporate elements of Cancer, Health care, Psychiatry, Developmental psychology and Disease.
The foci of the journal are Genetic counseling, Genetic testing, Family medicine, Medical education and Clinical psychology. Genetic counseling is the main point of discussion in Journal of Genetic Counseling but it also connects with fields such as
Some problems in Family medicine that were presented in Journal of Genetic Counseling overlapped with concepts under Psychological intervention, Pregnancy, Informed consent, Telehealth and Family history. While Journal of Genetic Counseling focused on Medical education, it was also able to explore topics like Workforce and Curriculum. Clinical psychology research featured in it incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Feeling and Anxiety.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Genetic Counseling (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Genetic Counseling (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.33% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 31.53% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 18.72% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 22.17% of all publications and 27.59% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Shivani Nazareth;Robert L. Nussbaum;Elen Siglen;Catherine A. Wicklund
(2021)Hila Milo Rasouly;Nicole Cuneo;Maddalena Marasa;Natalia DeMaria
(2021)Julia Wynn;Hila Milo Rasouly;Tania Vasquez-Loarte;Akilan M. Saami
(2021)Jennifer Verbrugge;Lola Cook;Mandy Miller;Malia Rumbaugh
(2021)Daniel Luksic;Radha Sukhu;Carrie Koval;Megan T. Cho
(2020)Carlijn G. E. Thijssen;Carlijn G. E. Thijssen;Daphne E. Doze;Arjen L. Gökalp;Janneke Timmermans
(2020)For those pursuing Medicine in the USA, understanding various related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways in healthcare. Many professionals begin with nursing degrees such as RN to BSN, which provides a foundational step for advancing in clinical and administrative roles. Programs like rn to bsn online offer flexible options that fit busy schedules without compromising educational quality.
Advancing further, ASN to FNP programs enable registered nurses to specialize as Family Nurse Practitioners, a role growing in demand nationally. This pathway bridges practical nursing experience with advanced practice skills, easily explored through asn to fnp programs that often combine online coursework with clinical placements.
For non-nurses interested in entering advanced nursing roles, online direct entry MSN programs provide accelerated routes to become nurse practitioners or clinical nurse leaders. These rigorous programs, highlighted in online direct entry msn programs, are designed to quickly prepare graduates for licensure and patient care.
Choosing the right institution is crucial. Comparing programs such as Chamberlain vs Capella rn to bsn program offers valuable insights into curriculum quality, support services, and outcomes. This comparison, available at chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program, helps students select the best fit for their professional goals.
