World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
H-index 75

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Medicine 89 467 1676 75

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 548
Documents by Best Scientists*: 1736
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 14
SCIMAGO H-index: 163
SCIMAGO SJR: 3.527
Impact Factor: 11.4

Overview

Top Research Topics at Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions?

Internal medicine, Cardiology, Surgery, Percutaneous coronary intervention and Myocardial infarction are the subjects of interest in Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions. The journal covers research in Internal medicine, particularly Valve replacement, Coronary artery disease, Transcatheter aortic and Stenosis and how they are related with concepts in In patient. The research on Valve replacement featured in Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions combines topics in other fields like Aortic valve stenosis, Aortic valve and Aortic valve replacement.

Artery, Revascularization, Angioplasty, Cardiac catheterization and Acute coronary syndrome are some of the study areas of Cardiology discussed. Most of the Angioplasty studies addressed also intersect with Balloon. Stent, Percutaneous, Randomized controlled trial, Restenosis and Treatment outcome are all aspects of Surgery discussed in the journal.

The Stent study featured falls within the wider field of Radiology. Conventional PCI and Emergency medicine are some topics wherein Percutaneous coronary intervention research discussed in it have an impact. In addition to Myocardial infarction research, Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions aims to explore topics under Clinical endpoint and Hazard ratio.

  • Internal medicine (57.99%)
  • Cardiology (55.54%)
  • Surgery (33.43%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography: A Comprehensive Review: Clinical and Research Applications (535 citations)
  • Trends in the Prevalence and Outcomes of Radial and Femoral Approaches to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (475 citations)
  • Predicting Successful Guidewire Crossing Through Chronic Total Occlusion of Native Coronary Lesions Within 30 Minutes : The J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) Score as a Difficulty Grading and Time Assessment Tool (465 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions:

The most cited publications generally zeroe in on subjects such as Internal medicine, Cardiology, Surgery, Percutaneous coronary intervention and Conventional PCI. The studies on Cardiology discussed at the published articles can also contribute to research in the domains of Odds ratio and Confidence interval. The most cited publications explore research in Surgery alongside concepts in Angioplasty and other areas of study in Balloon, Restenosis and Lesion.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Ron Waksman (170 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 10 less than at the previous edition,
  • Patrick W. Serruys (156 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
  • Antonio Colombo (135 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 14 less than at the previous edition,
  • Stephan Windecker (131 papers) published 14 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
  • Spencer B. King (123 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Columbia University Medical Center (240 papers) published 17 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
  • Mayo Clinic (221 papers) published 20 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center (177 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition, 8 less than at the previous edition,
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (171 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
  • Cleveland Clinic (170 papers) published 14 papers at the last edition, 13 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 32.52% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 26.59% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.80% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.79% of all publications and 46.81% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Opportunities after Publishing in Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions

An essential aspect of publishing research in a reputable journal such as Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions is the career opportunities that arise from such prestige. A significant number of researchers and physicians have leveraged on their publications in prestigious journals like this to secure top research and academic positions and to enroll in top-ranked post-graduate programs. One of the notable pathways that open to contributors is post-graduate programs, particularly in the medical and health sciences field. For instance, if you are interested in further specializing in the nursing field, consider exploring nurse practitioner programs in Virginia. These programs provide advanced nursing education, equipping graduates with essential skills in diagnosis, treatment, and management of medical conditions. Earning a degree from one of these programs would provide you with a broader base for your career, coupled with your already impressive research portfolio. More so, you would be well-equipped to tackle different roles in the healthcare sector, ranging from academia to direct patient care. If you are interested in learning more about these programs, explore the best nurse practitioner programs in Virginia. Beyond post-graduate education, publishing in Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions creates avenues for collaboration with other established researchers and institutions. It opens doors to invitations for speaking engagements and participation in expert panels in global symposiums and conferences. Additionally, it also increases your credibility and authority in your chosen field, which could attract funding for future research projects. In summary, publishing in a reputable journal like Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions is a valuable addition to any researcher's career. It expands opportunities for further education, collaboration and broadens career prospects in academia and the healthcare sector at large.

Top Publications

  • Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group

    Raban V Jeger;Raban V Jeger;Simon Eccleshall;Wan Azman Wan Ahmad;Junbo Ge

    (2020)
    317 Citations
  • Indigo Aspiration System for Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Results of the EXTRACT-PE Trial.

    Akhilesh K. Sista;James M. Horowitz;Victor F. Tapson;Michael Rosenberg

    (2021)
    216 Citations
  • Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: 5-Year Follow-Up of the IVUS-XPL Randomized Trial.

    Sung-Jin Hong;Gary S. Mintz;Chul-Min Ahn;Jung-Sun Kim

    (2020)
    207 Citations
  • Conscious Sedation versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Variation in Practice and Outcomes

    Neel M. Butala;Mabel Chung;Eric A. Secemsky;Pratik Manandhar

    (2020)
    203 Citations
  • 1-Year Outcomes of Angina Management Guided by Invasive Coronary Function Testing (CorMicA).

    Thomas J. Ford;Bethany Stanley;Novalia Sidik;Richard Good

    (2020)
    184 Citations
  • 5-Year Outcomes After TAVR With Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Valves: Results From the CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial

    Mohamed Abdel-Wahab;Martin Landt;Franz-Josef Neumann;Steffen Massberg

    (2020)
    173 Citations
  • Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation in Prohibitive Surgical Risk Patients.

    (2022)
    169 Citations
  • Alignment of Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Neo-Commissures (ALIGN TAVR): Impact on Final Valve Orientation and Coronary Artery Overlap

    Gilbert H.L. Tang;Syed Zaid;Andreas Fuchs;Tsuyoshi Yamabe

    (2020)
    160 Citations
  • Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Permanent Pacemaker Requirement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

    Yasser Sammour;Amar Krishnaswamy;Arnav Kumar;Rishi Puri

    (2021)
    158 Citations
  • Transfemoral Tricuspid Valve Replacement in Patients With Tricuspid Regurgitation: TRISCEND Study 30-Day Results.

    (2022)
    154 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine in the USA offers diverse pathways beyond traditional medical school. For those interested in nursing, understanding how to accelerate education and training is crucial. Programs like the how to become a nurse practitioner outline streamlined routes to obtain advanced practice credentials efficiently.

For registered nurses looking to enhance their qualifications, enrolling in the fastest rn to bsn program online can provide a quick and flexible pathway to a bachelor's degree. These programs help bridge the gap between associate and bachelor's level nursing education without lengthy time commitments.

Additionally, the option to pursue adn to np programs online enables nurses who hold an associate degree to transition directly into master's-level nurse practitioner roles. This pathway significantly enhances career prospects and scope of practice.

Salary expectations also vary across specialties and locations. Those considering mental health nursing, for example, can explore regional salary differences through resources like the dnp pmhnp salary guide to make informed career decisions.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal