International Psychogeriatrics

Top Research Topics at International Psychogeriatrics?

The journal investigates areas of study like Dementia, Psychiatry, Gerontology, Clinical psychology and Cognition. The Dementia research presented falls under the domain of Disease. The presentations focused mostly on Disease in an attempt to further explore topics in Internal medicine.

The research on Psychiatry discussed in it draws on the closely related field of Suicide prevention. The research on Gerontology tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Epidemiology, Quality of life (healthcare), Cross-sectional study, Public health and Mental health. The main emphasis of it is the subject of Clinical psychology, focusing on Psychometrics.

Cognition research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Developmental psychology and Cognitive decline. The journal is mostly focused on Depression (differential diagnoses), specifically Geriatric Depression Scale.

• Dementia (42.64%)
• Psychiatry (28.60%)
• Gerontology (23.78%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. (918 citations)
• The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI): A practical test for cross-cultural epidemiological studies of dementia. (681 citations)
• Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment. (637 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at International Psychogeriatrics:

The most cited articles focus on Dementia, Psychiatry, Gerontology, Clinical psychology and Depression (differential diagnoses). The most cited publications explore topics in Dementia which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Alzheimer's disease, Cognition, Psychological intervention and MEDLINE. While the journal articles focused on Psychiatry, they were also able to explore topics like Internal medicine and Epidemiology.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Disease
• Law

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

International Psychogeriatrics is organized to address concerns in the fields of Dementia, Gerontology, MEDLINE, Clinical psychology and Cognition. The Dementia research presented in International Psychogeriatrics explores the relationship between Randomized controlled trial and the closely related topic of Intervention (counseling). Epidemiology, Activities of daily living, Disease, Public health and Loneliness are some topics wherein Gerontology research discussed in it have an impact.

The research on MEDLINE featured in it combines topics in other fields like Text mining, Psychiatry, Intensive care medicine and 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak. While work presented in International Psychogeriatrics provided substantial information on Clinical psychology, it also covered topics in Cognitive impairment and Scale (social sciences). The concepts on Cognition presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Developmental psychology, Association (psychology) and Depression (differential diagnoses).

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Loneliness, physical activity, and mental health during COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis of depression and anxiety in adults over the age of 50 between 2015 and 2020. (27 citations)
• Systematic review on barriers and facilitators of complex interventions for residents with dementia in long-term care. (15 citations)
• Psychometric properties and feasibility of use of dementia specific quality of life instruments for use in care settings: a systematic review. (13 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in International Psychogeriatrics (based on the number of publications) are:

• David Ames (106 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Henry Brodaty (72 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Ajit Shah (69 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Nicola T. Lautenschlager (58 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Nancy A. Pachana (53 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in International Psychogeriatrics (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Melbourne (155 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• University of New South Wales (120 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• University College London (95 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Newcastle University (79 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Sydney (74 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.28% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 22.32% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.16% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.96% of all publications and 49.55% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Where to Gain Knowledge in Psychology?

If you are interested in gaining a deeper understanding of topics such as dementia, gerontology, clinical psychology, and cognition, one way to do so is by attending an institution that offers detailed courses in these areas. Deciding which college or university to attend can be a difficult choice. However, there are numerous well-known institutions that are recognized for their excellent psychology programs.

Specifically, if you reside in Mississippi or are considering studying in this state, you might want to review the list of the best colleges for psychology in Mississippi. These schools have been recognized for their comprehensive programs and dedication to student success. Their curriculum often features a variety of psychology specializations, including the ones mentioned in this article.

In addition to theoretical instruction, these institutions often provide opportunities for hands-on experience through research projects, internships, or practical courses. This not only enriches your understanding of the subject matter but also allows you to see how these psychological concepts translate into real-world scenarios.

By choosing a reputable school, such as one from the list of the best psychology colleges in Mississippi, you will be positioning yourself for success in your future academic or professional career in psychology.