World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Heart Rhythm
H-index 49

Heart Rhythm

1547-5271

Published by: Elsevier

https://www.journals.elsevier.com/heart-rhythm

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Medicine 276 536 2409 46

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 796
Documents by Best Scientists*: 2745
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 23
SCIMAGO H-index: 165
SCIMAGO SJR: 1.929
Impact Factor: 5.7

Overview

Top Research Topics at Heart Rhythm?

The journal was organized to reinforce research efforts on Internal medicine, Cardiology, Atrial fibrillation, Ablation and Catheter ablation. In addition to Internal medicine, it tackled discussions on In patient. The study on Cardiology presented in the journal intersects with subjects under the field of Anesthesia.

While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Atrial fibrillation, it also covered topics in Stroke and Surgery. The Ablation study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Catheter. Electrocardiography research presented is mostly focused on the subject of Electrical conduction system of the heart.

  • Internal medicine (68.10%)
  • Cardiology (64.27%)
  • Atrial fibrillation (22.16%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) (1586 citations)
  • HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes: document endorsed by HRS, EHRA, and APHRS in May 2013 and by ACCF, AHA, PACES, and AEPC in June 2013. (1207 citations)
  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow-up, Definitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design (1149 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Heart Rhythm:

The most cited papers explore disciplines such as Internal medicine, Cardiology, Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation and Ablation. Aside from discussions in Internal medicine, the most cited papers also deal with the subject of Anesthesia which intersects with Heart rate disciplines. Most of the Cardiology studies addressed in the journal publications also intersect with Surgery.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Gene

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Heart Rhythm investigates areas of study like Internal medicine, Cardiology, Atrial fibrillation, Ablation and In patient. Catheter ablation, Heart failure, Pulmonary vein, Cardiac resynchronization therapy and Ejection fraction are all subfields of Internal medicine research that were featured in the journal. While it focused on Cardiology, it was also able to explore topics like Electrophysiology and Lead (electronics).

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families. (26 citations)
  • The possible association between COVID-19 and postural tachycardia syndrome. (24 citations)
  • Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture (15 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Heart Rhythm (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Andrea Natale (178 papers) published 41 papers at the last edition, 30 more than at the previous edition,
  • Francis E. Marchlinski (158 papers) published 26 papers at the last edition, 17 more than at the previous edition,
  • Michel Haïssaguerre (145 papers) published 26 papers at the last edition, 23 more than at the previous edition,
  • Michael J. Ackerman (134 papers) published 16 papers at the last edition, 9 more than at the previous edition,
  • Peng Sheng Chen (133 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Heart Rhythm (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Mayo Clinic (343 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition, 13 less than at the previous edition,
  • University of Michigan (262 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 9 less than at the previous edition,
  • Cleveland Clinic (244 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
  • University of California, Los Angeles (235 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
  • Harvard University (233 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 75.19% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 18.75% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 14.40% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.66% of all publications and 49.18% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Impact of Heart Rhythm Research on Nursing Practice

One aspect not covered in this article is the impact of Heart Rhythm research on nursing practice, particularly for nurse practitioners. Given that heart rhythm abnormalities are one of the common conditions managed by nurse practitioners, the application of this research can be crucial in their clinical practice. For instance, nurse practitioners who work in cardiology or internal medicine settings may find the research on atrial fibrillation and catheter ablation directly applicable to the care they provide to their patients. Understanding the latest development in these research areas can help nurse practitioners to stay up-to-date with best practices and new treatment strategies. Moreover, this could also influence their decisions for a continuous education or specialization. Those who are considering a specialization or a post-master’s certificate might want to explore programs which provide a focus on cardiology or internal medicine. For example, considering one of the best np programs in Maryland could be an excellent start towards this pathway. Lastly, nurse practitioners on administrative positions can use the insights from these researches to influence healthcare policy and advocacy. By understanding the latest research in cardiology and internal medicine, they can make informed decisions that affect patient care on a larger scale. Overall, Heart Rhythm research plays a significant role in shaping the practice of nurse practitioners in various settings.

Top Publications

  • Recognizing COVID-19-related myocarditis: The possible pathophysiology and proposed guideline for diagnosis and management.

    Bhurint Siripanthong;Saman Nazarian;Daniele Muser;Rajat Deo

    (2020)
    760 Citations
  • COVID-19 and cardiac arrhythmias.

    Anjali Bhatla;Michael M. Mayer;Srinath Adusumalli;Matthew C. Hyman

    (2020)
    406 Citations
  • COVID-19 cardiac injury: Implications for long-term surveillance and outcomes in survivors.

    Raul D. Mitrani;Nitika Dabas;Jeffrey J. Goldberger

    (2020)
    307 Citations
  • 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.

    Martin K. Stiles;Arthur A.M. Wilde;Dominic J. Abrams;Michael J. Ackerman

    (2021)
    252 Citations
  • SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and inherited arrhythmia syndromes.

    Cheng I. Wu;Cheng I. Wu;Pieter G. Postema;Elena Arbelo;Elijah R. Behr

    (2020)
    246 Citations
  • 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

    (2023)
    229 Citations
  • European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases.

    (2022)
    195 Citations
  • Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: Results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry

    (2021)
    169 Citations
  • Intermediate Term Performance and Safety of His Bundle Pacing Leads: A Single Center Experience.

    (2021)
    153 Citations
  • Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients with type 2 diabetes or heart failure: A meta-analysis of 34 randomized controlled trials.

    Gilson C. Fernandes;Amanda Fernandes;Rhanderson Cardoso;Jorge Penalver

    (2021)
    148 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Medicine degrees in the USA, pursuing related online programs in healthcare can open diverse career opportunities. Degrees in healthcare administration are increasingly popular for those looking to manage medical facilities or healthcare organizations. Programs such as the healthcare administration online degree offer a fast track to gaining essential leadership skills.

Cost often plays a vital role in selecting the right program. Students can explore some of the most budget-friendly options through listings like the health administration degree online, which highlight affordable but quality programs designed for flexible learning.

For those passionate about nursing, numerous pathways exist—from becoming a registered nurse to advanced practice roles. The nurse practitioner courses online provide a chance to specialize and expand clinical expertise, while the best online nursing programs support foundational education relevant across many healthcare sectors.

These online degrees not only offer flexibility but also equip students with the skills necessary to succeed in a dynamic and growing healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal

Recently Published Articles