| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecology and Evolution | 364 | 66 | 61 | 10 |
Conservation Genetics Resources was organized to reinforce research efforts on Microsatellite, Genetics, Locus (genetics), Zoology and Loss of heterozygosity. The journal holds forums on Microsatellite that merges themes from other disciplines such as Ecology, Biodiversity, Linkage disequilibrium and Genetic diversity. More specifically, the research on Ecology in the journal is related to Threatened species.
It explores issues in Genetics which can be linked to other research areas like Evolutionary biology and Population genetics. The Evolutionary biology study featured in the journal draws connections with the study of DNA sequencing. It focuses on Locus (genetics) but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Pyrosequencing, Genetic marker, Genetic structure, Conservation genetics and Null allele.
The journal focused on Zoology research but expanded to cover Endangered species. It explores research in Single-nucleotide polymorphism and overlapping concepts in Genotyping to expand the discourse in Loss of heterozygosity. The research on Genome featured in it combines topics in other fields like Botany and Phylogenetic tree.
The most cited publications explore disciplines such as Microsatellite, Genetics, Ecology, Locus (genetics) and Zoology. In addition to Microsatellite research, the published articles aim to explore topics under Evolutionary biology, Genetic diversity and Loss of heterozygosity. The journal publications facilitate discussions on Zoology that incorporate concepts from other fields like Feces and Population structure.
The primary areas of discussion in Conservation Genetics Resources are Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Biodiversity, Evolutionary biology, Zoology and Genetics. While the journal focused on Single-nucleotide polymorphism, it was also able to explore topics like Genotyping, DNA sequencing and Loss of heterozygosity. Issues in Biodiversity were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Critically endangered, Endangered species, Identification (biology), Fishery and Threatened species.
Topics in Evolutionary biology explored in Conservation Genetics Resources were investigated in conjunction with research in Range (biology), Phylogenetic tree, Microsatellite, Genetic structure and Primer (molecular biology). The concepts on Zoology presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including mtDNA control region, Taxon, Mitochondrial DNA and Environmental DNA. While Conservation Genetics Resources focused on Genetics, it was also able to explore topics like Bass (fish) and Misgurnus.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Conservation Genetics Resources (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Conservation Genetics Resources (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 15.71% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 10.17% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.47% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.95% of all publications and 64.41% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Julie Strand;Helena Thomsen;Julie B. Jensen;Cecilie Marcussen
(2020)Martin Leipold;Simone Tausch;Markus Hirtreiter;Peter Poschlod
(2020)Markus A. Min;Markus A. Min;Paul H. Barber;Zachary Gold;Zachary Gold
(2021)Michael E. Yusishen;Frances-Claire Eichorn;W. Gary Anderson;Margaret F. Docker
(2020)Steven M. Mussmann;Marlis R. Douglas;Max R. Bangs;Michael E. Douglas
(2020)Robin Schütz;Ralph Tollrian;Maximilian Schweinsberg
(2020)Rolf Holderegger;Benedikt R. Schmidt;Christoph Grünig;Robert Meier
(2020)Damian M. Menning;Trey Simmons;Sandra L. Talbot
(2020)Studying Ecology and Evolution offers diverse career pathways that often intersect with healthcare and environmental management fields. Many students explore related online degrees to enhance their qualifications or shift towards specialized roles. For example, pursuing dnp online programs can open doors to nursing leadership roles focused on public and environmental health.
Those interested in healthcare but seeking easier admission routes may consider attending one of the easy nursing schools to get into. These programs provide accessible pathways to gain critical knowledge applicable to evolutionary biology and human health.
For students aiming to manage healthcare systems or environmental health initiatives, the healthcare administration degree offers accelerated, flexible online options. This can complement expertise in ecology by integrating organizational skills with scientific understanding.
Additionally, some nursing aspirants might prefer programs without standardized testing barriers and may explore nursing programs no teas required. Such options help streamline entry into healthcare professions connected to evolutionary and ecological research.
