Clinical interventions in aging

Top Research Topics at Clinical Interventions in Aging?

Clinical Interventions in Aging primarily focuses on research topics in Internal medicine, Physical therapy, Gerontology, Surgery and Dementia. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Internal medicine, it also covered topics in Endocrinology and Cardiology. The in-depth study on Cardiology also explores topics in the intersecting field of Blood pressure.

In it, Intervention (counseling), Randomized controlled trial, Quality of life and Physical medicine and rehabilitation are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Physical therapy research. Gerontology research featured in it incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Psychological intervention, Cross-sectional study and Activities of daily living. Surgery works presented in Clinical Interventions in Aging have a specific focus on Retrospective cohort study.

It addresses concerns in Dementia which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Psychiatry and Cognition. Clinical Interventions in Aging focuses on different Osteoporosis studies like Bone mineral and Bone density.

• Internal medicine (30.13%)
• Physical therapy (16.24%)
• Gerontology (13.06%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. (971 citations)
• Studies on free radicals, antioxidants, and co-factors. (762 citations)
• Effect of aging on respiratory system physiology and immunology (461 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Clinical Interventions in Aging:

The most cited papers investigate areas of study like Physical therapy, Gerontology, Internal medicine, Dementia and Intensive care medicine. While the journal papers focused on Physical therapy, they were also able to explore topics like Sarcopenia, Randomized controlled trial, Quality of life and Physical medicine and rehabilitation. The published articles explore issues in Internal medicine which can be linked to other research areas like Endocrinology, Surgery and Cardiology.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Surgery
• Disease

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The journal aims to foster the development of research in Internal medicine, Logistic regression, Confidence interval, Odds ratio and Prospective cohort study. The concepts on Internal medicine presented in Clinical Interventions in Aging can also apply to other research fields, including Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Depression (differential diagnoses) and Cardiology. The journal explores issues in Depression (differential diagnoses) which can be linked to other research areas like Dementia, Gerontology and Activities of daily living.

Logistic regression research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Demography, Polypharmacy, Nomogram, Public health and Comorbidity. Clinical Interventions in Aging holds forums on Confidence interval that merges themes from other disciplines such as Physical therapy, Grip strength, Timed Up and Go test and Receiver operating characteristic. The work on Odds ratio tackled in Clinical Interventions in Aging brings together disciplines like Stroke, Diabetes mellitus and Univariate analysis.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• The Pathogenesis Based on the Glymphatic System, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. (4 citations)
• Scalp Biophysical Characteristics in Males with Androgenetic Alopecia: A Comparative Study with Healthy Controls. (3 citations)
• Cognitive Frailty and 30-Day Mortality in a National Cohort of Older Chinese Inpatients. (3 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Clinical Interventions in Aging (based on the number of publications) are:

• Fredric S Brandt (78 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Alex Cazzaniga (78 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Michael H Gold (67 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Izabella Uchmanowicz (17 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Suzana Shahar (16 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Clinical Interventions in Aging (based on the number of publications) are:

• Capital Medical University (52 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 5 less than at the previous edition,
• Wrocław Medical University (32 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Chinese PLA General Hospital (25 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• The Chinese University of Hong Kong (24 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Tongji University (24 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 9.04% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 23.18% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 6.62% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 19.21% of all publications and 50.99% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Eligibility and Requirements for Research Participation

The entire body of research conducted under the Clinical Interventions in Aging requires individuals who are experts in their respective fields. These experts comprise of medical practitioners, rehabilitation therapists, gerontologists, psychologists and others who have a key role in this research. Participation and contribution in research can greatly enhance their knowledge, experience, and reputation in their respective fields. However, there's a certain requirement of licensures and certifications that these professionals often need to maintain or acquire to continue or start practicing in their areas respectively. States specific licenses also play an important part, depending upon the location where research is being conducted. For instance, in Nevada, acquiring a nursing license has certain procedures that must be adhered to. To understand this better, one can refer to the article on nevada nursing license requirements, to comply with the state guidelines and regulations for nursing practice that can come in handy for participating in the research related to Gerontology, Physical Therapy, Dementia and more. It provides a comprehensive guide on the steps to be followed, fees involved, and the typical processing timeline. Individuals aspiring to be part of such research should always keep themselves updated with such license requirements to ensure they meet all eligibility criteria to participate in research at Clinical Interventions in Aging.