| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law | 56 | 4 | 9 | 3 |
The primary areas of discussion in Capital Markets Law Journal are Financial system, Law and economics, Finance, Accounting and Bond. The work on Financial system tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Sovereign debt, Financial crisis and Restructuring. Topics in Restructuring were tackled in line with various other fields like Debt restructuring and Creditor, Debt.
Finance research is the primary subject tackled in it with a focus on Capital market. The study on Accounting presented in it intersects with the topics under Prospectus. The work on Bond addressed in Capital Markets Law Journal expands to the thematically related Sovereignty.
Sovereignty works presented in it have a specific focus on Pari passu.
The most cited publications focus on Law and economics, Financial system, Capital market, Capital (economics) and Financial regulation. The most cited articles facilitate the exploration of Law and economics in relation to the field of Resolution (logic). The journal papers explore topics in Financial regulation which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Core (game theory) and Market economy.
The journal generally zeroes in on subjects such as Financial system, Law and economics, Finance, Debt and China. The studies on Financial system discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Sovereign debt and Restructuring. The overlapping concepts between Sovereignty and Creditor are the key highlights of Restructuring study.
Studies in Law and economics and Scheme (programming language) are the key highlights in the journal. The journal explores issues in Finance which can be linked to other research areas like Transparency (behavior), Public finance, Investment (macroeconomics) and Corruption. Some problems in Debt that were presented in Capital Markets Law Journal overlapped with concepts under Economic policy, Economic reform and Central government.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Capital Markets Law Journal (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Capital Markets Law Journal (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 50.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 23.08% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 30.77% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 23.08% of all publications and 23.08% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Luca Enriques;Wolf-Georg Ringe
(2020)Stephen J Choi;Mitu Gulati;Robert E Scott
(2021)Mark C. Weidemaier;G. Mitu Gulati
(2020)Ugo Panizza;Mitu Gulati
(2021)Theresa Arnold;Mitu Gulati;Ugo Panizza
(2020)Mihalis Gousgounis;Mitu Gulati;Lee C Buchheit
(2021)Mitu Gulati
(2021)Mitu Gulati
(2021)