British Journal of Radiology

Top Research Topics at British Journal of Radiology?

The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Radiology, Nuclear medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Anatomy. Radiography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound, Angiography and Radiological weapon are some of the facets of Radiology tackled in it. Nuclear medicine research presented in British Journal of Radiology encompasses a variety of subjects, including Radiation therapy, Irradiation and Optics.

• Radiology (22.12%)
• Nuclear medicine (20.04%)
• Surgery (18.14%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• “Gray's Anatomy” (5150 citations)
• Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. 1973. (3018 citations)
• The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy (1795 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at British Journal of Radiology:

The most cited publications investigate studies in Nuclear medicine, Radiology, Surgery, Pathology and Radiation therapy. While work presented in the journal papers provide substantial information on Nuclear medicine, it also covers topics in Tomography and Irradiation. The journal articles facilitate discussions on Radiation therapy that incorporate concepts from other fields like Cancer, Carcinoma and Medical physics.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Radiology
• Surgery

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The main research concerns discussed in British Journal of Radiology are Radiology, MEDLINE, Text mining, Nuclear medicine and Internal medicine. Interdisciplinary research on topics like Radiology and In patient are the foci of the journal. The journal focuses on MEDLINE as well as the interrelated topic of Medical physics.

While British Journal of Radiology focused on Internal medicine, it was also able to explore topics like Oncology and Cardiology.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Rectal spacer hydrogel in 1.5T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: dosimetric analysis and preliminary patient-reported outcomes. (10 citations)
• Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging (7 citations)
• A study of using a deep learning image reconstruction to improve the image quality of extremely low-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for patients with hepatic lesions (7 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in British Journal of Radiology (based on the number of publications) are:

• Thomas Sherwood (52 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Eric Samuel (41 papers) absent at the last edition,
• John R. K. Savage (39 papers) absent at the last edition,
• James F. Brailsford (39 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Eliseo Vano (38 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in British Journal of Radiology (based on the number of publications) are:

• The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (153 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Cambridge (143 papers) published 15 papers at the last edition, 6 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Manchester (114 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• University of Oxford (94 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• Harvard University (80 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 6 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 8.30% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 13.94% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 9.05% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.25% of all publications and 65.77% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Implications of Research and Future Perspectives

In light of the examined topics, it appears that the British Journal of Radiology plays a key role in research and development in fields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Surgery. However, the pervasive nature and rapid evolution of these fields generate a multitude of future research possibilities and implications that must be considered. For instance, the progression in Radiology research could contribute significantly to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. It is anticipated that more advanced imaging technologies will enable earlier and more accurate diagnosis, leading to improved patient outcomes. Meanwhile, research in Nuclear Medicine could expedite the discovery of more effective treatment strategies for cancer and other diseases. It's noteworthy that advances in these fields could potentially redefine healthcare paradigms. These implications underscore the importance of interdisciplinary collaborations of professionals, not only within the fields of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine but also with experts from other sectors such as informatics, engineering, and nanotechnology. Moreover, nurturing future nurse practitioners with current trends and advancements in these fields can ensure competent healthcare delivery. As such, enrollment in reputed programs, such as the np programs in north carolina, can equip aspiring practitioners with the necessary skills and knowledge to cope with forthcoming healthcare challenges. Adding to this, it is crucial for researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers to acknowledge these potential implications while formulating future strategies. In conclusion, while the British Journal of Radiology continues to be a hub of groundbreaking research in Radiology and Nuclear medicine, the potential future implications of this work are vast and multi-faceted, thus warranting further discussion and exploration.