| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 31 | 419 | 777 | 97 |
The journal primarily tackles Biomedical engineering, Cell biology, Biocompatibility, Regeneration (biology) and Tissue engineering. The journal focuses on Biomedical engineering research which is adjacent to topics in Self-healing hydrogels. In Bioactive Materials, Cell and Bone regeneration are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Cell biology research.
The Bone regeneration study featured in it draws connections with the study of Bone healing. It focused on Biocompatibility research conducted under the discipline of Chemical engineering. While it focused on Chemical engineering, it was also able to explore topics like Corrosion and Magnesium.
It focuses on Corrosion as well as the interrelated topic of Magnesium alloy. The research on Tissue engineering tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Regenerative medicine and Nanotechnology.
The most cited publications primarily focus on research topics in Biocompatibility, Nanotechnology, Tissue engineering, Biomedical engineering and Scaffold. The studies on Tissue engineering discussed at the journal publications can also contribute to research in the domains of Chitosan, Nanocomposite, Drug delivery, 3D printing and Self-healing hydrogels. While Biomedical engineering is the focus of the journal publications, it also provides insights into the studies of Biofilm, Mesenchymal stem cell and PLGA.
Bioactive Materials mainly deals with areas of study such as Biocompatibility, Biomedical engineering, Cell biology, Tissue engineering and Cancer research. Biocompatibility research presented in it encompasses a variety of subjects, including Titanium, Biophysics, Self-healing hydrogels and Alloy. Issues in Self-healing hydrogels were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Fibrin glue and Drug delivery.
Biomedical engineering works presented in it have a specific focus on Scaffold. The study of Mesenchymal stem cell and how it intertwines with concepts under In vitro were explored in the presented Scaffold research. Tissue engineering research in Bioactive Materials involves the investigation of Nanotechnology studies, all of which are linked to disciplines such as Adhesion.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Bioactive Materials (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Bioactive Materials (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2022 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 45.57% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 16.46% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 8.86% of all publications and 29.11% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Xuewei Zhang;Xi Chen;Hua Hong;Rubei Hu
(2022)Chong Wang;Wei Huang;Yu Zhou;Libing He
(2020)Erlin Zhang;Xiaotong Zhao;Jiali Hu;Ruoxian Wang
(2021)Junjie Chi;Junjie Chi;Junjie Chi;Xiaoxuan Zhang;Xiaoxuan Zhang;Canwen Chen;Changmin Shao
(2020)Yutong Yang;Yongping Liang;Jueying Chen;Xianglong Duan
(2022)Cijun Shuai;Cijun Shuai;Cijun Shuai;Wenjing Yang;Wenjing Yang;Pei Feng;Shuping Peng;Shuping Peng
(2021)Duoyi Zhao;Duoyi Zhao;Tongtong Zhu;Tongtong Zhu;Jie Li;Liguo Cui
(2021)Anting Jin;Yitong Wang;Kaili Lin;Lingyong Jiang
(2020)Exploring a degree in Materials Science opens doors to diverse career options, many of which intersect with technology, healthcare, and engineering sectors. For those interested in healthcare, understanding roles like a child life specialist salary can provide insight into specialized support roles that complement medical science fields.
Advancing in healthcare education is also streamlined through flexible options such as the bsn to msn programs, which cater to nurses seeking higher qualifications. This flexibility is similar to the adaptable learning paths available in STEM fields including materials science.
Data analysis and interpretation skills gained in Materials Science can translate well to careers like a sport analyst, where pattern recognition and statistical expertise are paramount. This showcases the versatility of a materials science education beyond traditional physical science roles.
Another growing field is medical coding, where professionals play a critical role in healthcare documentation. Understanding how much do medical coders make can be motivating for individuals exploring allied health professions that benefit from a scientific background.
