Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements

Top Research Topics at Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements?

The primary areas of discussion in the journal are Internal medicine, Cardiology, Surgery, Heart failure and Ejection fraction. The journal aims to investigate interdisciplinary topics such as Internal medicine and In patient. While it focused on Cardiology, it was also able to explore topics like Blood pressure and Diastole.

Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements focuses on different Surgery studies like Percutaneous and Retrospective cohort study. The majority of Myocardial infarction studies are focused on the issues of Conventional PCI.

• Internal medicine (66.81%)
• Cardiology (48.67%)
• Surgery (17.32%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Acute heart failure in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in the context of global SARS-CoV-2 pandemi (211 citations)
• 137 Impact of left atrial volume on clinical outcome in organic mitral regurgitation (21 citations)
• Venous thromboembolism in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection (19 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements:

Internal medicine, Cardiology, Surgery, Ejection fraction and In patient are the main subjects of interest in the most cited publications. The most cited papers focus on Cardiology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Twist and Absolute risk reduction. The journal articles facilitate the exploration of Ejection fraction in relation to the field of Context (language use).

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements (based on the number of publications) are:

• Rachida Habbal (203 papers) published 46 papers at the last edition, 22 more than at the previous edition,
• Yves Cottin (156 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• Jean Ferrières (106 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Damien Bonnet (103 papers) published 21 papers at the last edition,
• Sébastien Hascoet (94 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 12 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements (based on the number of publications) are:

• French Institute of Health and Medical Research (603 papers) published 73 papers at the last edition, 24 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Paris (118 papers) published 53 papers at the last edition, 33 more than at the previous edition,
• Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital (94 papers) published 15 papers at the last edition, 13 more than at the previous edition,
• Paris Descartes University (74 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Strasbourg (70 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 6 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 56.86% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 61.63% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.47% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.67% of all publications and 11.24% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Advancement in Cardiovascular Research

Pursuing a career in cardiovascular research offers exciting opportunities. With the continuous development in cardiology field, the sector needs professionals who are continuously learning, researching, and developing innovative treatments. This career path requires not only a strong educational background and specialized training, but also nursing licensure in some instances. For instance, a researcher who also serves as a clinical nurse would need to follow specific nebraska nursing license requirements nursing license cost. Having additional credentials such as a nursing license can potentially broaden your career prospects in the cardiovascular research field by opening the door to clinical practice. This unique combination of conducting research and involvement in direct patient care can improve patient outcomes and lead to more relevant research inquiry. Deciding in which direction to steer your career in cardiovascular research can be a daunting process. Some may prefer purely academic positions focusing on research, while others may opt to supplement their research career with clinical practice. Regardless of the chosen path, maintaining a lifelong commitment to learning and professional development is essential. It remains incumbent on all healthcare professionals, especially researchers and practitioners in the cardiovascular field, to keep abreast of the latest developments and continue to contribute meaningfully to the field.